“Muslim Rage” and the Hypocrisy of the Western Liberal Eliteby Richard 
Silverstein on September 24, 2012

The western liberal élite has a problem with Muslims, in particular 
with Muslim Rage, as Newsweek’s cover called it.  It reminds me of that 
priceless, old misogynist quotation from Sigmund Freud: women–what do 
they want?
What do Muslims want, columnists like Roger Cohen, Bill Keller, and Nicholas 
Kristof seem to be saying.  They want to be part of the modern world yet they 
import these age-old hatreds that are so–well, primitive and unmodern.  
Muslims aren’t ready for civilization-primetime.
In his latest column, Cohen takes to calling Islam “fervid and 
turbulent” compared to its older brother religions, Christianity and 
Judaism, which are oh so much more mature and stable, apparently.
All of this serves as background related to a provocative 
Islam-hating film produced and promoted by the Coptic Christian 
diaspora.  No doubt, you’ve heard all you need to about this piece of 
garbage, so I won’t repeat what you already know.
What non-Muslim westerners can’t fathom is how angry Muslims were in 
response to this calumny.  To an insult, they said, you respond by 
killing?  We don’t do that anymore in modern society.  We’re above that 
sort of blood-letting.  We solve our differences civilly through debate 
and the free exchange of ideas.
As if.  The history of all western religions is replete with 
murderous rampages far more destructive than the riots that swept Libya 
and 20 other Muslim nations over the past weeks.  If you’re a Christian 
you should know of the Crusades, the Inquisition, and various heresies 
like the Albigensian Crusade , a sectarian theologically-rooted 
genocide.
Jews historically, have enjoyed less power to take vengeance on their enemies 
or heretics within.  But Biblical history tells of the 
extermination of various tribes like the Amalekites, Jebusites and 
Moabites who stood in the way of Israelite conquest of ancient 
Palestine. In latter-day Israel, a virulent variant of Judaism known as 
settlerism engages in acts of violence against Jews and non-Jews alike 
who question Jewish supremacism in the so-called Jewish state. This 
Jewish Rage takes the form of violent pogroms, killings, arson, and 
sexual assaults that are no less primitive than anything we saw in 
Libya.
By what right does the pot call the kettle black? Why do we allow 
amnesic liberal journalists like Cohen, Kristof and others to wag their 
fingers at the “turbulent” Muslims, all the while forgetting that 
Judaism and Christianity have been roiled by precisely the same schisms 
and hatreds leading to even deeper levels of violence.
Lest they say: well, that was then this is now. In ancient times, 
sure humanity pursued ancient hatreds. But today, we’re more civilized. 
Disagreements can be worked out through civil discourse rather than 
riots in the streets.
Tell that person to turn back the pages of history only a few decades to 
Sarajevo in the 1990s when an Orthodox Christian Serbian army 
besieged a Muslim city (Sarajevo), shelling it unmercifully. Remember an act of 
genocide called Srebenica in which thousands of Muslim men were 
slaughtered. Then tell me how much better we resolve our differences in 
today’s world.
Add to that America’s new-found zeal for finding and making enemies 
in the Muslim world through Obama’s “kill lists” and faceless drone 
strikes in many Muslim nations. No one, certainly not Cohen or Kristof 
noted that the potent combination of American attacks that have killed 
hundreds of Muslim civilians throughout the Miseast; and an Islamophobic video 
produced in America, have created a perfect storm of outrage. So 
no, it’s not just a puerile video, but an unending series of violent 
assaults by America in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan and 
Iraq–with Iran possibly being added to the agenda–that have brought on 
this latest crisis. And no, it won’t be the last.
So my response to the journalists tut-tutting over Muslim rage is 
first to look in the mirror. When you understand the rage that burns in 
every human heart and can acknowledge that all of us are guilty of it, 
then you may offer a tutorial on tolerance or whatever lesson you wish 
to teach. Till then, you’re little more than a hypocrite who’s 
conveniently forgotten the lessons of history.
Let’s return to another bit of Cohen’s condescension. He calls Islam 
“hypocritical” for:
Deploring attacks on it while often casting scorn on 
Judaism and Christianity, claiming the mantle of peace while inspiring 
violence
It seems to me there’s at least as much Islamophobia in the world as 
there is Muslim intolerance of western religions. As for inspiring 
violence, well, America far outstrips any Muslim nation in it’s 
capability for inspiring violence in the Middle East. Whatever 
legitimate grievance we came to Afghanistan to avenge has been 
long-since exhausted.
There is another troubling element to this liberal western proffering of advice 
to the world’s Muslims. What gives them the right? If they 
offered a balanced critique of the deficiencies of all the major 
religions, then we might say they’re entitled to include Islam within 
the scope of their brief. But singling out one religion, one that isn’t 
even yours smacks of Orientalist cultural condescension.
I feel the same way when non-Jews try to lecture me about what 
Judaism is or isn’t–usually by way of saying why I’m not a proper Jew. 
What chutzpah. I, who lived and pondered this religion I’ve born into my whole 
life–being lectured by someone who doesn’t have the faintest idea about what 
this religion all about.
There are, it is true, even a few Muslims who’ve taken up the cry of 
the western liberal elites. We expect to hear such attacks from figures 
like Salman Rushdie, who provoked Muslims with his portrayal of the 
Prophet in Satanic Verses and who was demonized in return. There are 
others like Qanta Ahmed, who wrote a strange op-ed in Haaretz in which she 
suggested to her Muslim brothers that they 
would do well to emulate the spirit of humility, repentance and 
forgiveness represented by the Jewish holiday of Selichot. Somehow, the 
idea of a Muslim woman recounting High Holiday services spent with her 
Jewish medical mentor and his family isn’t going to be terribly 
persuasive to a Muslim audience.
When will someone show me a Jew attending services in a mosque who 
draws a profound lesson from Muslim faith that is lacking in Judaism? 
Then, Ahmed’s moralizing would be more welcome inside the Muslim 
community. It should go without saying that Ahmed is a Templeton Fellow, so 
designated by the conservative Christian foundation of the same 
name. She appears to be an ally of Zuhdi Jasser, another conservative 
Muslim at odds with most of the rest of American Islam. She joined him 
in testifying to the profoundly Islamophobic King committee that sought to 
portray American Islam as riddled by jihadism. They both also defended the NYPD 
for its spying against Muslims. Both have participated in the Muslim-baiting 
efforts of the Clarion Fund and its triad of anti-Muslim films.
To be clear, I’m no more justifying or excusing the bloodbath that took place 
in Libya than I am the one in Srebenica or Anatot. They’re all horrifying. They 
all prove that our respective religions 
can be hijacked by extremists who represent the worst our religions have to 
offer the world. But those who offer lessons to others without 
taking stock of their own failings aren’t suited to be moral avatars.

http://www.richardsilverstein.com/2012/09/24/muslim-rage-and-the-hypocrisy-of-the-western-liberal-elite/

P.S.  I haven't copied and pasted them here, but the reader's responses to this 
article are really worth reading, too.  Go to the blog.
Hajja Romi/"Blue"


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to