[image: Logo Venezuela Analysis] Violent Destabilisation Strategy as a
Possible Scenario on 7 October

Sep 30th 2012, by Prensa REMI
[image: Opposition guarimba (archive)]

Opposition guarimba (archive)

*Threats of violent destabilisation in this juncture*

Based on various declarations made by spokespeople of [opposition parties]
Popular Will, Sumate, and other opposition organisations in the support
material that was used in their election booth witness training workshops,
a Plan B, or a destabilising plan linked to the election process has become
apparent, where some under cover counter revolutionary forces have been
preparing a confrontation action with the following courses of action:

1. Not recognise the election results if they aren’t favourable

2. Scream electoral fraud (they have been preparing the land these last few
months through their spokespeople, media, and social networkers)

3. Organise subversive acts that contravene public order and use a
“critical mass” (professionals of diverse areas: journalists, graphic
reporters, lawyers, artists, engineers, economists etc) as cannon fodder.

4. Through agitational focus points and “guarimbas” (violent
destabilisation), create a picture of ungovernability.

5. Use these actions as a trigger of generalised violent conflict  to
provide the framework for special undercover operations, presenting a
picture of civil war.

6. In this political- military conflict, the conditions for foreign
intervention would be generated.

*Execution of the Guarimba Plan and the key voting booths*

The progress of the above scenario is intimately associated with the
deployment of committed groups in areas near the voting centres, to promote
violent situations there.

Under the alibi of defending the vote of the Venezuelan Command [the
opposition’s electoral campaign] has organised units of the following
forces:

- 133,893 witnesses to safeguard the votes

- 82,530 progressives (in charge of mobilising voters who have difficulties
arriving at their voting booths)

-40,000 logistical volunteers (authorised to support anything that is
necessary within and outside the voting booths)

The actions of the referred to groups is focused on what they have called
“key electoral centres”.

According to the internal documents of Capriles’ campaign, the “key
electoral centres” are those that fulfil one or various of the following
indicators:

1. Electoral centres where they detected irregular voting compared to
nearby centres.  This means that where, for example, nearby the opposition
loses 60 to 40, in the key ones we lose 90 to 10 or worse [“we” refers to
the opposition]

2. Electoral centres where there have been violent incidents against
opposition witnesses

3. Electoral centres in far away rural zones, or in populated high risk
areas, where the opposition doesn’t have any witness presence.

4. New electoral centres, because they don’t have historical references.

In other words, they have located their actions in those electoral centres
with the following characteristics:

1.  Where the Chavistas have a majority.

2. Where the MUD [opposition coalition] doesn’t have enough witnesses or
machinery

3. Where there have been irregularities or conflicts in the past.

4. Where, according to the opposition, there is a possibility of vote
usurpation.

5. In the new centres created by the CNE.

6.  In those places where the electoral result, abstention, and blank votes
have a anomalous historical behaviour.

The Venezuelan command has established a Special Unit of Attention to
Electoral Centres, based on the following indicators:

-Of the total electoral register of 18,802,648 (not including the votes
outside of Venezuela), 3,290,692 people will vote in the key centres, which
represents 17.5%.

-Of the 13,683 electoral centres, 5,328 are key centres, or 38.9%.

-Of the total voting booths established by the CNE of 39,018, the key
centres will have 8,437 booths, which represents 21.6%.

The objective of the Special Units of Key Centres is to guarantee that in
each of them, they have one centre coordinator and that each booth has at
least two opposition witnesses.

Also in the guarimba document “parcelisation” and “mapping the
municipalities” and “establishing points of operative support” are talked
about where the units will be operating.

*Organisation and function of the Special Unit of Attention to the Key
Centres*

In the following graphics, which were support material for the training of
members of the special unites organised by the Venezuelan command for the
guarimbas, we find the main operative faces of this strategy, under the
disguise of defending the vote:

[Note, due to their Spanish content, Venezuenalysis.com has only included a
few of the graphics, to give the reader proof that this article is based on
real opposition documents]

*Key voting centres*

**

*Defense of the vote and functional organisation*

*Intelligence networks for an early alert*

At the moment, taking into consideration the threats concretised in the
guarimba scenario, which we have described above, a greater effort is
required to map the situations and behaviour of the opposing actors
involved in the planning of implicit actions in said scenario.

In such a case, it’s necessary to work with the following lines of action,
with tactical and operative purposes:

1.  A conflict map

2. A map of opposing actors and their profiles

3. A map of relationships between these actors

4.  Territorial map or geographical location (circuits, problematic or
conflictive voting centres)

5. Scenarios

These requirements take on life in the course of action of 7 October,
detecting actions and potential conflicts at the following times:

1. Opening of voting centres and the installation of the booths

2. Start of voting

3. Close of centres

4. Scrutiny

As a profile of what could happen, we provide an example of things that
could happen at these times:

-During the opening of the centres, critical moments are possible if there
are delays in opening, which could be caused by having to wait for the
booth members or witnesses to arrive, or the placing of people in the queue
to cover a deficit.

-At the start there could be tensions due to the managing of queues,
identification, propaganda and how to votes, arguments with the Republic
Plan [the soldiers watching over the booth]

-For the close of booths there could be conflicts created by the closing
time when there are or aren’t queues.

*Translation by Tamara Pearson for Venezuelanalysis.com*
 ------------------------------
*Source URL (retrieved on 30/09/2012 - 8:04pm):*
http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/7297

 Another Venezuelan Opposition Leader Withdraws Support, Claiming Capriles
is a “Photocopy” of Chavez

Sep 30th 2012, by Tamara Pearson
[image: Aldo Cermeno declaring his support for Chavez on public television
(VTV)]

Aldo Cermeno declaring his support for Chavez on public television (VTV)

*Caracas, September 30th 2012 (Venezuelanalysis.com) –  Aldo Cermeno,
ex-governor of Falcon state and ex national secretary of one of the largest
opposition parties, Copei, said on Friday that he will now support
president Hugo Chavez and that opposition presidential candidate Henrique
Capriles is “tricking the Venezuelan people”* .

Cermeno, speaking at a press conference in Caracas, said, “Capriles uses
double speak... I think his campaign is deceitful towards the Venezuelan
people”.

Cermeno said that there is “tremendous” discontent and confrontations
within the opposition around the country over the fact that Capriles’
party, First Justice (PJ) is excluding others from its presidential
campaign, and “putting the interests of its party above those of the
country”.

Capriles was chosen as a candidate for the umbrella grouping of opposition
parties, the MUD, in February this year, in primary elections that many,
including members of the opposition, claimed were forged.

“In the face of this...situation... I have made a decision... from my
position as a democratic Christian, I’m going to go with the candidature of
President Hugo Chavez, because he has sufficient willingness, sense, and
magnanimity for the country,” Cemeno said.

He added later that, “I’m convinced there’s no going back, my figures say
that President Hugo Chavez will win [the 7 October elections]”.

Cermeno also claimed that, based on a conversation he had with Capriles in
Paraguana, Falcon, the discourse that Capriles has been using in public is
“false”, and his message is a copy of president Hugo Chavez’s one.

While publically Capriles has claimed he would maintain the social missions
were he to be elected, and while has used left wing discourse of justice
and equality, a document revealed by other opposition members showed that
his real government plan is a neoliberal one that would involve opening up
of the economy to more private investment, and the reduction of state
funding for public services and communal council projects.

“Between the photocopy and the original the people will vote for the
original, and the original is Hugo Rafael Chavez Frias,” Cermeno said.

“He who hopes to run a country, without recognising his own personal
history, is using a mistaken strategy,” Cermano added.

Cermeno was a member of Copei for 49 years, and was expelled from the party
after his comments on Friday. Copei, in an official statement, clarified
that Cermeno’s comments were his individual opinion and not representative
of the Copei party and blamed Cermeno’s declarations on the national
government’s “manoeuvrers...to distract and confuse Venezuela, as a result
of [the national government’s] desperation, as they are losing”. Poll
companies, both private and public, are giving Chavez a double figure lead
over Capriles.

Apart from Cermeno, recently three other opposition leaders; Hermann
Escarra, David De Lima, and William Ojeda have also publically criticised
Capriles and the difference between his discourse and his real government
plan, Capriles had to fire a top campaign aide after a video showed him
accepting a large bribe, and four small parties withdraw their support for
Capriles.
 ------------------------------
*Source URL (retrieved on 30/09/2012 - 8:06pm):*
http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/7296


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to