Dear Supporter, Tell moderator Bob Schieffer to ask a question on drones at Monday's presidential debate on foreign policy. Take Action During the last two presidential debates, the foreign policy discussion—what little there has been—has largely centered around the murder of four members of the US embassy staff in Benghazi. But while these four deaths were certainly grievous, the killing of hundreds of civilians in Pakistan from US drone strikes has so far been ignored—and that's outrageous.
But we may be able to change that. Next Monday, October 22, President Obama and Mitt Romney will face off in the final debate before election day—and the entire debate will be dedicated to foreign policy issues. Drones deserve a place in the discussion. Tell moderator Bob Schieffer to ask a question on drones during Monday's presidential debate on foreign policy. http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=sm87mFR7JYVqWyhqXjrLkaDfvvOVts42 In the last four years, the use of unmanned drones to engage in so-called “targeted killing” has escalated dramatically. In Pakistan alone, US drone strikes have increased five fold during the Obama administration. [1] Drone campaigns have also expanded in other countries, such as Yemen and Somalia, and recent reports suggest that the administration is considering further expanding the CIA drone fleet and using drones to hunt down the terrorists involved in last month's Benghazi attack. [2] [3] Yet, the Obama administration has failed to engage substantively on the morality, efficacy, and accuracy of US drone strikes. Earlier this week, Just Foreign Policy's Policy Director, Robert Naiman, returned from Pakistan, where he was participating in a peace delegation against US drone strikes. While there, Robert and other members of the delegation had two meetings with the acting US ambassador to Pakistan, Richard Hoagland. During these meetings, the ambassador acknowledged the existence of an official, classified civilian death count, denied recent reports that the US has targeted rescuers via “secondary” or “follow-up” strikes, and also denied a New York Times report that the US was counting every “military-aged male” killed by a US drone strike as a “militant.” [4] [5] US officials in Washington have never engaged in this kind of public dialogue on the drone strike policy. It's time for that to change. The American people deserve to know what the next administration has planned for US drone strike policy. Yet, the media has not been aggressive enough in challenging the administration's assertions on drones, as the public editor at the New York Times, Margaret Sullivan, recently acknowledged. [6] Nor has Romney been asked a substantive question on how drones would be used in his administration in any of the numerous debates he's participated in. [7] According to the website of the Commission on Presidential Debates, which sponsors all the presidential debates, the topics for Monday's debate will include “America's Role in the World”, “The Changing Middle East and the New Face of Terrorism”, and “Our Longest War—Afghanistan and Pakistan”. [8] Considering the fact that drones have become a serious source of tension between the US and Pakistani governments, [9] the candidates ought to be pressed on the issue of drones. Tell Bob Schieffer to make drones an issue in Monday's foreign policy debate. http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/act/drones-debate-question Thank you for all you do to help bring about a more just foreign policy, Megan Iorio, Chelsea Mozen, Sarah Burns and Robert Naiman Just Foreign Policy Please support our work. Donate for a Just Foreign Policy. http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate References: 1. "Covert Drone War," Data on US drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=GMSiPbBjp81O8ZyMQAQ2YKDfvvOVts42 2. “White House considers Libya drone attack,” Kimberly Dozier and Rukmini Callimachi, Associated Press, October 16, 2012, http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2012/10/16/news/white-house-considers-libya-drone-attack/ 3. "CIA seeks to expand drone fleet, officials say," Greg Miller, Washington Post, October 18, 2012, http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-seeks-to-expand-drone-fleet-officials-say/2012/10/18/01149a8c-1949-11e2-bd10-5ff056538b7c_story.html 4. “Americans Press US Ambassador for End to Drone Strikes in Pakistan, and the Ambassador Responds,” Robert Naiman, Huffington Post, October 5, 2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/americans-press-us-ambass_b_1941919.html 5. “When a Drone Flies Over Waziristan, Does It Make a Sound?” Robert Naiman, Truthout, October 17, 2012, http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/12174-when-a-drone-flies-over-waziristan-does-it-make-a-sound 6. “Questions on Drones, Unanswered Still,” Margaret Sullivan, New York Times, October 13, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/14/public-editor/questions-on-drones-unanswered-still.html 7. “Presidential debate: Drone question, please!” Erik Wemple, Washington Post, October 16, 2012, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/presidential-debate-drone-question-please/2012/10/16/c1adb576-17a0-11e2-9855-71f2b202721b_blog.html 8. “Moderator Announces Topics for Third Presidential Debate,” Commission on Presidential Debates, October 12, 2012, http://www.debates.org/index.php?mact=News,cntnt01,detail,0&cntnt01articleid=45&cntnt01origid=15&cntnt01detailtemplate=newspage&cntnt01returnid=80 9. “US drone strikes kill suspected insurgents in Pakistan,” Associated Press, July 23, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/23/drone-strikes-pakistan © 2012 Just Foreign Policy [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
