Flu Shot Being Forced on Health Workers
October 9, 2012
Why don’t they want it?  Because some of them know too much. Here’s the whole 
tawdry tale.
This week we learned that hospital employees throughout Colorado will be fired 
unless they get a flu shot by the end of the year.  New state health 
regulations require flu shots for health care workers to be phased in over the 
next several years, but nearly all hospitals in Colorado have made the 
vaccinations mandatory—immediately.  Employees are exempt from the shot only 
for medical reasons; if they refuse, they will be suspended, and if they 
haven’t gotten the shot by the end of the year, they will be fired.
Many healthcare workers don’t want the injection.  No surprise there.  They 
know more about it, that it is not safe by any means.  As we reported last 
month, the US flu shot still contains mercury, which among other things is 
associated with the development of Alzheimer’s.  And a recent study indicates 
that people who received a flu shot were more likely to become infected with 
the H1N1 flu virus than people who haven’t received the shot!
Far safer choices exist to keep people from catching the flu—the most important 
of which is to ensure an adequate level of vitamin D in your system.  Even so, 
mainstream medicine, the mass media, and federal and local governments all push 
the flu vaccine as if it is humanity’s last, best hope.
Why?  It’s our old friend Crony Capitalism at work again:
The government has formed strong partnerships with the pharmaceutical 
industry.  For example, the federal government has just invested $400 million 
of your money toward the development and manufacture of vaccines and “medical 
countermeasures” to be used in health emergencies and preparedness protection.  
Vaccine giants Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Lonza are among those on the 
receiving end.
Sometimes, as in the case of Gardasil, the government itself is involved in the 
vaccine’s development and grants a license to a vaccine maker for profit.  The 
government is also subsidizing the development of adjuvants—that is, vaccine 
agents designed to increase the immune response—which are often very dangerous 
substances.
The government then reviews the product for safety and efficacy and—no big 
shocker here—approves it.
It then subsidizes the vaccine’s manufacture—$2.8 billion of taxpayer money in 
2005 was spent subsidizing the rapid development of cell-based technology for 
making the flu vaccine.
Having demonstrated a complete lack of objectivity, the same government issues 
guidelines to the states about mandating flu shots for all school children and 
healthcare workers.
It then shields the vaccine manufacturer from any liability for adverse 
reactions to the flu shot, dismisses reports of adverse events, refuses to 
investigate them or even study whether the vaccine is actually conferring any 
immunity, which in many instances is highly doubtful.
What is especially troubling about this recital of blatant conflicts of 
interest and flagrant disregard for public safety is that none of the 
participants seem to feel the slightest shame over it.  Instead they haughtily 
dismiss their critics as cranks or flat-earthers and go right on practicing 
crony medicine.
Sometimes it appears that the vaccine makers are just fronts for the 
government, albeit very well-paid fronts.  The Department of Health and Human 
Services (HHS) awarded Sanofi Pasteur a $77.4 million contract to retrofit its 
flu vaccine manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania; the vaccine manufacturer, 
by contrast, will be contributing only $25 million toward the project!  As part 
of the ongoing bird flu pandemic preparation, Sanofi Pasteur received another 
$100 million contract from HHS to manufacture the vaccine in bulk concentrate 
form, plus additional fees to be paid for storage of the vaccine, and 
formulation and filling of the vaccine upon government request.  (In 2005, the 
subsidies were even higher: $7.1 billion in flu preparations.)  These contracts 
will make Sanofi Pasteur the largest supplier of influenza vaccine in the US 
and the world.
As for the adverse event reports, you may recall that the government has set up 
a “vaccine court”—the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, a no-fault 
payout system with a $2.5 billion fund derived from a 75-cent-per-dose tax on 
vaccines.  It is designed to protect vaccine makers from the kind of costly 
lawsuits that drove many out of the vaccine-making business in the 1970s and 
’80s.
It is not widely known, but the program has issued decisions in favor of 
plaintiffs who were hurt by the flu vaccine.  These included very serious 
complaints such as Guillain-Barre Syndrome, acute demyelinating 
encephalomyelitis, encephalopathy, ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest, 
transverse myelitis, or some combination of these.  In these cases, they 
received monetary settlements, but the vast majority of the decisions mandated 
the stipulation that “the Respondent (the government) denies injury/death was 
caused-in-fact by vaccination.”
Why is the major media silent about this?  Do they not care about children with 
Guillain-Barre Syndrome?  Or does it have something to do with the drug company 
advertising that keeps the traditional media on life support?  (Most vaccine 
makers are subsidiaries of drug companies.)
The CDC reportsthat they detected an increase in the number of adverse events 
last season—febrile seizures, that is, convulsions accompanied by high 
fevers—after children had received the flu shot, though the government made no 
changes to their flu shot recommendations.  On the contrary, a 2011 report from 
the Government Accountability Office argues that if morepeople could be counted 
on to be inoculated every year, it would give companies the incentive they need 
to make vaccines! In other words, let’s persuade people to get more shots (and 
in the case of healthcare workers, let’s force them to) so that companies will 
make enough money on a reliable basis!
The government is also eyeing cutting-edge vaccine research.  A new generation 
of vaccines will be using viral DNA to quickly churn out key proteins to elicit 
a protective immune response.  Protein Sciences of Meriden, CT, has already 
applied to the FDA for approval to sell a vaccine made by genetically 
engineering flu genes into a worm virus, which then infects cells from 
caterpillar ovaries to produce the necessary proteins to make vaccine.
Who will test the efficacy and safety of this new vaccine when it arrives?  
That’s right, the same federal government that is subsidizing its creation—the 
one that is going to push state governments to make it a legal requirement.

Flu Shot May Be GIVING People the Flu!
September 18, 2012
Flu season is just around the corner. Better think twice before visiting your 
local drugstore for that little shot!
Three years ago, a Canadian research team noticed that people who received a 
flu shot were more likely to become infected with the pandemic H1N1 virus than 
those who hadn’t received a shot. Five follow-up studies were done in several 
provinces, with the same disturbing results.
Now a new double-blind study led by an influenza expert at the British Columbia 
Centre for Disease Control has recreated the event using ferrets. The ferrets 
in the vaccine group became significantly sicker than the other animals.
No one is entirely sure why this is, though it does not appear to have been a 
problem with the flu vaccine used in Canada. So not only do we have to worry 
about the side effects of the flu vaccine, it now seems to be exacerbating the 
very illness it’s supposed to prevent.
This is not the first time a flu drug turned out to be ineffective, making 
people potentially more vulnerable to the flu. Roche Pharmaceuticals was 
accused of withholding data about its Tamiflu pill—data that suggested not only 
was the drug not as effective as it had been reported, it actually appeared to 
be no more effective than aspirin. It also appears to interfere with the body’s 
own ability to create antibodies to the flu virus, which is important to fight 
off future infections.
Yet Tamiflu was stockpiled by various world governments during the swine flu 
pandemic. The UK had contracts in place for 50 million doses of Tamiflu, enough 
for 80% of population, while the US had stockpiled over 37 million doses. The 
cost to US taxpayers was $1.5 billion.
For Big Pharma, the next pandemic is nothing more than an opportunity to make 
more money—at the expense of our pocketbooks, our health, and sometimes even 
our lives. Remember that the US flu shot—unlike the one given in Europe—still 
contains mercury, which is another important reason to avoid it.
Better yet, go for the far more effective natural cures. Vitamin D is extremely 
effective in combating influenza. The treatments we mentioned in our TB article 
in this issue would also apply to the flu.
Editor’s Note 9/19/12: In an earlier version of this article, we mistakenly 
referred to Tamiflu as a vaccine. It is, in fact, not a vaccine, but rather a 
flu treatment that may also be taken to prevent the flu.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to