Though this bloggers refers to the position as electing the Commander in
Chief, I still find many of his documented other facts, correct.

The electoral system in 1787 removed our individual votes from electing a
President.

First race card played in 1787, as well as immigration phobia. I also note
it runs on the average of every 6 years that race card is played to elect
someone, and then the laws are almost universally defunded, leaving the
immigration/race issue to be a useable tool in the future (fix nothing
that gets your man elected).

Federalist = supporter of the most moneyed.

Republican/Democrat = supporter of the most moneyed

Some people seem to think we lost our representation as citizens in the
1900's instead of the 1700's.

Hamilton, the most vocal representative of the moneyed during the American
revolution, it was his block of people in the Continental Convention that
stopped funding George Washington, leaving him and his men in Valley Forge
over the winter without pay or food.

Hamilton was our first Treasure.

1796 Hamilton introduced the first nosy sex scandal into an election.

Hamilton introduced our first negative campaigning, by pseudonym or proxy,
instead of being out in the open about his mythical accusations,
circumventing people being able to be confronted by their accusers.

Hamilton introduced the first item about accusing a competitor of
cowardice, without proof.

The first instance of some non Corporate/Big Business Party being blamed
for a Corporate party loss.

The newspapers were used like they are today, trial in the press without
proof of charges, and removal of enough whole facts people could make
independent decisions on their own.

It is interesting to note that Washington wrote about his disgust of the
minority representation for only the most powerful people, while he
himself was after land the American Indians had, the whole of the Ohio
River Valley, whom he treated as less then living beings.

The 12th Amendment of course, continued to move voting away from the white
landed people to the even more power factions within the country (which is
why Jefferson was accused of being non white, it would have disqualified
him).

Ever wonder where the phrase, a Burr in your side came from?

And here we are today, nothing changes if nothing changes.

Anyone fine with the FEAR THE OPPOSITION voting system should read not
only this but study how effective it is at removing data, facts, knowledge
and good decisions from EVER ELECTING A REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE MAJORITY.
For the lazy, just compare 200 years ago here, with today.

Scott

http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2012/10/inside-america%E2%80%99s-first-dirty-presidential-campaign-1796-style/

Inside America’s first dirty presidential campaign, 1796 style

Posted 10 hours, 43 minutes ago.

By Scott Bomboy

    Subscribe

Shocked by the discourse of this year’s presidential campaign? Wait till
your hear what happened in 1796, when the U.S. had its first contested
election for commander-in-chief.

On October 19, 1796, a mysterious editorial from a writer named Phocion
appeared in the Gazette of the United States, a popular Federalist
newspaper in Philadelphia.

At the time, Vice President John Adams was pitted against another Founding
Father, Thomas Jefferson, in a race to succeed George Washington as
president. Phocion’s letter was what we would today call an “attack ad.”

The letter in the Gazette written by Phocion said, in terms understood by
most readers, that presidential candidate Jefferson was having an affair
with one of his female slaves.

Bestselling author Ron Chernow chronicled the incident in his biography of
Phocion–the person also known as Alexander Hamilton.

In a Batman-complex moment, Phocion also accused Jefferson of running away
from British troops during the Revolution, unlike his brave friend
Alexander Hamilton.

Phocion also paid compliment after compliment to Adams and claimed
Jefferson would emancipate all slaves if he were elected president.

The “slave” letter was one of several dozens written by Hamilton during
the campaign, all attacking Jefferson.

The incident was one of the first instances where the “race card” was
played in a presidential election.

It was the first presidential race in America with two political parties:
the Federalists (led by Adams and Hamilton) and an opposing group, later
to be called Republicans, or Democratic-Republicans (led by Jefferson and
James Madison).

Washington was so popular that he won his two elections without meaningful
opposition. But Washington said in September 1796 he wouldn’t seek a third
term, giving Americans about three months’ notice to find a replacement.

Adams defeated Jefferson by three electoral votes in the short but nasty
1796 election, which shocked contemporaries in its use of dirty tactics
and back-door maneuvering. Adams gained an electoral majority by just one
vote.

The ever-scheming Hamilton, says Chernow, caused more problems for himself
and Adams, even though Adams won the election by a narrow margin.

Adams wound up blaming Hamilton and Jefferson for his close victory, and
he particularly targeted Hamilton for plotting Adams’ near-defeat by
trying to funnel votes to a third candidate, Thomas Pinckney of South
Carolina.

One theory advanced by historians is that Hamilton secretly lobbied in the
South for Federalists to elect Pinckney as president by withholding just a
handful of votes for Adams.
Bad election system leads to political parties, mud slinging

In the original election system set up in 1787, each elector cast two
votes, and the top two candidates became president and vice president. Six
states had direct popular elections, but 10 others let state legislatures
choose the electors.

That would have made Pinckney the president and Adams the vice president,
if several Federalists voted for Pinckney and another lesser candidate,
like Samuel Adams.

Recent Constitution Daily Stories

Mitt Romney takes lead in projected electoral vote count
Google Trends shows growing Romney interest among swing state voters
Romney’s ace could come from a mystery swing state

Instead, Hamilton’s secret was discovered by some in New England, a region
that had many more Federalists. Some electors refused to cast their second
vote for Pinckney. Others had turned on Pinckney, without knowing about
the plot, because he was pro-slavery.

The result was that Adams became president and his former-friend-turned
rival, Jefferson, became vice president.

Jefferson’s folks had been using their own “strong” campaign tactics in
the fight against Adams.

Adams was accused of wanting to be king and starting a dynasty, and
sucking up to England, too, in the process. He was also accused of being
overweight.

In the Saturday Evening Post in 1976, the legendary columnist Jack
Anderson wrote about response from Adams’ “people.”

“Adams’s opponent, Thomas Jefferson … was accused of being the son of a
half-breed Indian and a mulatto father. Voters were warned that
Jefferson’s election would result in a civil war and a national orgy of
rape, incest, and adultery,” Anderson said.

The Adams folks also said Jefferson was godless and wanted to spread the
French Revolution to America. They also said Jefferson’s supporters were
“cut-throats who walk in rags and sleep amid filth and vermin.”

But in 1796, it was unsuitable for a candidate to actually campaign
directly, and only one candidate did so, the lesser known Republican vice
presidential candidate Aaron Burr. Surrogates were the first embryonic
factions that soon evolved into political parties.

Many Americans weren’t happy with the discourse in the 1796 election,
having never seen party politics in action before.

George Washington stated his disgust in his farewell address, given three
months before the election.

“They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and
extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the
nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising
minority of the community,” he said.

“They are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent
engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled
to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins
of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted
them to unjust dominion.”

Washington wouldn’t live to see his prediction come true in the 1800
presidential election, where an Adams-Jefferson rematch led to an
unforeseen constitutional crisis—a tied election—fueled by deeply partisan
tactics and more plotting by Hamilton, Jefferson, and Burr.

The result was the passage of the 12th Amendment, which changed the
original presidential voting system passed in 1787. It was ratified in
June 1804, just a month before Burr killed Hamilton in their famous duel.

Scott Bomboy in editor-in-chief of the National Constitution Center.





------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links









------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to