California Agency Releases Evidence of Money Laundering in Right-Wing
Campaign Spending on Ballot
Measures<http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/11/05/california-agency-releases-evidence-of-money-laundering-in-right-wing-campaign-spending-on-ballot-measures/>By:
David
Dayen <http://news.firedoglake.com/author/dday/> Monday November 5, 2012
11:09 am

[image: 
Tweet]Tweet<http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/11/05/california-agency-releases-evidence-of-money-laundering-in-right-wing-campaign-spending-on-ballot-measures/#>
[image: 
digg]<http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://fdl.me/PywtdJ&title=California+Agency+Releases+Evidence+of+Money+Laundering+in+Right-Wing+Campaign+Spending+on+Ballot+Measures>[image:
stumbleupon]<http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://fdl.me/PywtdJ&title=California+Agency+Releases+Evidence+of+Money+Laundering+in+Right-Wing+Campaign+Spending+on+Ballot+Measures>
<http://news.firedoglake.com/?p=38690&akst_action=share-this>

California’s Fair Political Practices Commission forced a mysterious $11
million donor to two ballot measures to reveal its secret funding sources
today, and the result showed how most of these independent expenditure
groups work, mostly through money
laundering<http://www.mercurynews.com/elections/ci_21932215/fppc-releases-names-donors-who-made-secret-11?source=jBar>
:

Ending a mystery that captivated the run-up to Election Day, the Arizona
group behind an anonymous $11 million donation revealed under court order
today that the shadowy donation was laundered through two groups, including
one tied to David and Charles Koch, the billionaire brothers who have
played a huge role in spreading anonymous political cash around the country.

The donation, the largest anonymous contribution to a ballot measure
campaign in California history, was made to the Small Business Action
Committee, a conservative group running a campaign for Proposition 32, the
measure that would curb labor’s ability to collect political cash, and
against Proposition 30, Gov. Jerry Brown’s tax-hike initiative.

“This isn’t going to stop here,” said Ann Ravel, chairwoman of the Fair
Political Practices Commission, the state’s political watchdog. “They
admitted to money laundering. We agreed to do this without an audit because
we wanted to get information to the public before the election. But we in
no way agreed this would preclude further action.”

Ravel said Phoenix-based Americans for Responsible Leadership conceded it
was the intermediary and not the true source of the contribution. The true
source was Americans for Job Security and was made through a second
intermediary, the Center to Protect Patient Rights, she said.

Americans for Job Security was both active in the 2010 election cycle. They
are a corporate front
group<http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Americans_for_Job_Security>which
received initial funding from the insurance industry. And the Center
to Protect Patient Rights is run by a Koch Brothers operative, Sean Noble,
who admitted the money laundering to the FPPC. This is a misdemeanor under
California law, but conspiracy to commit money laundering is a felony.

What we really see in these revelations is the complex web of front groups
that mask corporate spending almost entirely. Hearing that Americans for
Responsible Leadership donated a large sum of money that was seeded by
Americans for Job Security just replaces one brick wall with another, as
far as transparency is concerned. And this is par for the course in
campaign finance – layers of spending and intermediaries and front groups
to make it as difficult as possible to divine the true source of the
donations.

The spending in California went toward two ballot measures. Prop 32 would
essentially eliminate union participation in politics in the state, while
Prop 30 would increase taxes to fill a budget gap on education spending.
The funding went toward Yes on the former and No on the latter. Prop 32,
opposed by a strong union-based campaign, will lose tomorrow. But even with
that loss, you may be able to describe it as a victory, because it pulled
focus from the most effective groups from the left in state politics,
leaving the critical Prop 30 generally on its own to fend off right-wing
attacks. Polls show Prop 30 too close to call, after being solidly ahead
earlier in the cycle. So all this spending did its job, by spreading thin
the spending on the left and possibly defeating a tax measure that, if it
fails, will lead to more stinging cutbacks in public services and a further
drowning of government in the bathtub.

This is the textbook for how these funding networks work: spend huge,
everywhere, secretly if at all possible, and keep chipping away at the
state until you can notch a victory. The FPPC struck a small blow for
transparency here, but the system remains unbowed.
[image: comment on this]No
Comments<http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/11/05/california-agency-releases-evidence-of-money-laundering-in-right-wing-campaign-spending-on-ballot-measures/#respond>
Tags: fundraising <http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/fundraising/>, campaign
finance <http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/campaign-finance/>,
SuperPAC<http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/superpac/>,
Americans for Job
Security<http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/americans-for-job-security/>,
Prop 30 <http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/prop-30/>, independent
expenditures<http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/independent-expenditures/>,
Prop 32 <http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/prop-32/>,
FPPC<http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/fppc/>,
Americans for Responsible
Leadership<http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/americans-for-responsible-leadership/>,
Calfornia <http://news.firedoglake.com/tag/calfornia/>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to