PHOTO GALLERY: Clashes enter tenth day around Tahrir
Square<http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContentMulti/59364/Multimedia.aspx>

http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContentMulti/59364/Multimedia.aspx

-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.marxist.com/egypt-morsi-humiliated-as-revolution-raises-head.htm


Egypt: Morsi Humiliated as Revolution raises its head once
again<http://www.marxist.com/egypt-morsi-humiliated-as-revolution-raises-head.htm>
Written by Hamid AlizadehWednesday, 28 November 2012
[image: 
Print]<http://www.marxist.com/egypt-morsi-humiliated-as-revolution-raises-head/print.htm#>

Anger was simmering on Tahrir Square yesterday as hundreds of thousands
poured in to the square to protest against Egypt's President Mohammed Morsi
and his ruling Muslim Brotherhood (MB). Across the square large banners
were inscribed with slogans such as “The Muslim Brotherhood has stolen the
revolution” and “The Muslim Brotherhood are liars”. Throughout the day a
seemingly never-ending stream of marches reached the square from all over
the ancient city. In size and radicalism yesterday’s protest was equalled
only by those that overthrew the hated dictator Hosni Mubarak in January
2011.

[image: Tahrir Square yesterday. Photo: Gigi
Ibrahim]<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/egypt/2012-11-27-tent_city_Tahrir-Gigi_Ibrahim.jpg>Tahrir
Square last night. Photo: Gigi
Ibrahim<http://www.flickr.com/photos/gigiibrahim/>This
marked the 6th day of protests that initially started by opposing a decree
by the President which would concentrate all state power in his hands. The
decree, besides letting him rule with immunity from the judiciary, would
also allow him to take “any measures necessary” to “defend the revolution”.
In reality this is a pretext to do the very opposite! Initially the
reaction to the decree was confined to relatively small layers of mainly
youth. But as the repression of the protests turned more and more heavy
handed the main reasons behind the decree became clearer for the wider
population.

Sensing that the revolution might be in danger, the masses returned to the
streets. The chants of “The people want to bring down the regime,” “Leave,
leave!” and “Down with the regime!” once again resounded all over Tahrir
Square. Reflecting the mood on the streets one participant, Mohammed Magdi,
told AP, “We want to change this whole setting. The Brotherhood hijacked
the revolution. People woke up to his [Morsi's] mistakes, and in any new
elections they will get no votes.” Magdi was among a massive crowd of
around 10,000 marching from the working class district of Shubra.

The riot police showed no mercy to the crowd which it attacked several
times during the day. The tear gas they used, and which covered large parts
of the square throughout the day, was of a particularly dangerous type and
ended up costing the life of a 54-year-old man. Prime Minister Hesham
Qandil had warned earlier on the day that, “The government would sternly
confront any destructive and violent actions that deviate from peaceful
protests.” But confronted with the revolutionary wave the forces of the
state proved to be powerless.

In spite of the harsh conditions, people kept pouring into the symbolic
square. As the day went the crowds swelled beyond what any of the
organizers had anticipated. The Muslim Brotherhood itself put the figure at
2-300,000. Many say that this was one of the largest protests ever in
Egypt. One activist wrote on Twitter in the late afternoon: “The other
amazing thing is that there is no space in Tahrir and the marches haven't
even reached it yet!”

The protesters weren’t only the youth, but from all walks of life, from
striking workers and trade unionists to students and housewives, men and
women, young and old, all there to show their anger and indignation.
Another activist wrote on Twitter, “This time, whole families went down.
All the independents came down this time, some of our parents for the first
time as well.”

Also beyond Cairo people were taking to the streets on a massive scale.
There were large demonstrations in all major towns and cities across the
country from Alexandria, Suez, Port Said and Luxor to Sohag, Assyut,
Damietta, Mahalla, Tanta and many more.

Although the swelling numbers in the square filled the masses with
confidence and revolutionary optimism the mood was very serious and
militant, far from the euphoric jubilant moods immediately after the
revolution. This was in line with the mood we have witnessed in the
demonstrations over the last week.

In Alexandria where tens of thousands had participated in the protests, the
Muslim Brotherhood ordered its members to abandon their offices which were
under attack. In Mansoura the offices of the Muslim Brotherhood were burned
down. In the proletarian bastion of Mahalla, protesters attacked the
offices of the Muslim Brotherhood with stones and Molotov cocktails.
The Islamists Stand Naked

The Muslim Brotherhood, along with its political partner the Salafist *Nour
Party*, had initially called for a counter-demonstration to take place in
Tahrir Square as well. But seeing the mood that was developing they had to
cancel their main rally in Cairo, hoping that at least in the other towns
they would be able to muster sizeable turnouts. But despite this, and
despite a well organised network and access to the state as well as its
funds, the pro-Morsi demonstrations did not materialise.

Only in the town of Assiut, far away from the industrial towns of the Nile
delta, did the Brotherhood manage to gather 5000 people for a pro-Morsi
demonstration. The protesters though, were mainly students of the Al-Azhar
University, the chief centre of Islamic learning in the world, which is led
by the reactionary Muhammad Sayyid Tantawy – an old supporter of Mubarak.

In Alexandria, which was known to be a stronghold of the Muslim Brotherhood
and their Salafist friends, the Islamists only managed to stage episodic
gatherings which were dispersed by anti-Brotherhood crowds. In the end the
MB had to evacuate their headquarters which the angry crowd then tried to
set on fire.

The Islamists are under heavy pressure now. In a pathetic move, the ever so
arrogant leader of the Nour Party and advisor to Morsi, Emad
Abdel-Ghaffour, told Reuters that he had “not been consulted” before the
announcement of the decree by Morsi last week.

The Muslim Brotherhood, after barely five months in office, have now
entered into crisis. Only a few days ago bourgeois commentators around the
world were hailing Mohammed Morsi as the new leader of the Arab world, some
even going as far as proclaiming him to be the new Nasser.

But today all the previous glory he was basking in has been destroyed by
the Egyptian masses who thoroughly humiliated him with this massive show of
force. Last night Morsi was only standing due to the mercy of the masses.
If he had dared to call for a counter-demonstration in Tahrir, it would
have been thoroughly defeated and his presidency would not have lasted
until the morning.

Morsi is not and will never be a new Nasser, because Nasser, despite his
shortcomings, based himself on the mass of workers and poor in Egypt to
strike blows against capitalism. Morsi (just like the rest of his Islamist
allies) on the other hand, more than anything else is the man of capital,
the man of the old order standing as an obstacle to the birth of a new one.
Felools manoeuvre – “Leaders” open door for them

On Monday, in an attempt to diffuse the movement that was building up,
representatives of the President met with the Judiciary in order to strike
a deal. Although a full retreat would have been too humiliating, Morsi
publicly assured the Judges that his immunity would be limited to
“sovereign matters”.

At first the judges seemed to accept the deal, but seeing the anger on the
streets they calculated that they could gain more concessions if they dug
their heels in for a bit longer. Therefore they publicly denounced the deal
claiming that there had never been one.

[image: Tahrir Square last night. Photo: Gigi
Ibrahim]<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/egypt/2012-11-27-Egyptian_flag-Gigi_Ibrahim.jpg>
Photo: Gigi Ibrahim <http://www.flickr.com/photos/gigiibrahim/>It is clear
that while the MB in general has no problems working with the *Felool* –
name adopted by Egyptians for remnants of the old regime – it is not all
layers that are equally happy about sharing power with the group. Some of
these layers see the present crisis as an opportunity to strike back in
order to regain their lost positions. The hysterical shrieks of these
gentlemen, we should add, are not fooling any Egyptian who can remember how
the same judiciary both under Mubarak and since then has been a pillar of
support for reaction.

However, while trying to ride the wave of revolution in order to strike
blows against the MB, they mobilised for today’s protest and some of them
attended Tahrir square. But throughout the day it was clear that the square
resisted this trick and the Felools clearly stood out as an isolated
minority in the protests.

Unfortunately though, those who were supposed to lead the masses did not
see through this trick. Last Thursday, the Liberal, Mohammed ElBaradei, and
the Nasserist, Hamdeen Sabahi – who are generally seen by the masses as
parts of the camp of revolution – announced a new National Rescue Front
along with Amr Moussa, who was foreign minister under Mubarak. With the old
excuse of “the more the better” these gentlemen are not only inviting Amr
Moussa in but also his Felool friends in the judiciary and other places.

The point is that the revolution has nothing in common with these people
who just a few months ago were ready to drag the country through a sea of
blood rather than have the people take power. Let us not forget that it was
the judiciary who manoeuvred to cancel the parliamentary elections and to
meddle in the constituent assembly. It was also the Judiciary who showed
extreme leniency on Mubarak’s butchers when they appeared in court. To give
any opening to these people is equal to inviting the counter-revolution
deep into the camp of revolution – and this could have devastating
consequences.

Instead of clearing marking out the fault lines within society, and raising
the political understanding of the masses, this tactic can only serve to
disorientate and weaken the revolution. The first concrete results of this
alliance have already revealed themselves. Firstly, the Brotherhood has
been able to publicly accuse the anti-Brotherhood demonstrations of being
in alliance with the Felool, a fact which would naturally dissuade many
from joining the movement. Secondly, in order to satisfy the Felool, the
programme of the front has been watered down to such a degree that it
cannot attract anyone.

Its main demands are the revoking of the presidential decree and in defence
of the judiciary. To the extent that it defends the judiciary it is
repelling the most honest and farsighted revolutionary forces and to the
extent that it demands a withdrawal of the decree, it is actually
tail-ending the movement whose demands in the Square were “down with the
regime” i.e. *for a new revolution.*

Thus we can see that the formula of “the more the better” actually turns
into its opposite of limiting the scope of the revolutionary movement in
order not to step on the toes of the old rulers. The only way to guarantee
victory is by stating what is and putting forward a bold revolutionary
programme and a plan of action aimed at sweeping away the whole regime and
the economic and social system that stands behind it.

Sabahi won more than five million votes in the first rounds of the
presidential elections; he would probably have won the elections outright
had there not been massive vote rigging. All of this happened because from
the very beginning he made it clear that he was the “candidate of Tahrir”,
and that he would support neither Shafik (candidate of the old regime) nor
Morsi in a possible second round. But by cosying up with the Felool now he
is risking losing all that support.

If, yesterday, Sabahi had called for an escalation of the struggle into a
general strike and a march on the presidential palace to overthrow Morsi,
nothing could have stopped the movement. But instead the NRF is merely
calling for more demonstrations and protests.

The Revolutionary Socialists, as we explained in June, made a similar
mistake. During the presidential elections, instead of exposing bourgeois
class base and the counter-revolutionary character of the Muslim
Brotherhood, they recommended a vote for Morsi as “the lesser evil”.
Morsi’s campaign even thanked them in their victory statement. That
criminal mistake – for which the leadership of this organization is fully
responsible – weakened the organization and its links with the genuine
revolutionary forces that are clearly not with the Brotherhood.

In the last few days they issued a statement distancing themselves from the
Brotherhood, but this is somewhat too late. If they had had the strength
and understanding that it was necessary to state the real nature of the MB
from day one of the revolution they would have had much to gain now as the
living experience of the masses has shown them the true nature of the
Brotherhood. Thus, because of this mistake and others like it, the
organization and its many talented and dedicated members only form a small
and relatively isolated part of the movement.
Protracted and Unstable Process

To all the sceptics who were moaning about the end of the Egyptian
revolution after the coming to power of the MB, yesterday’s demonstration
should have served to teach them an important lesson. Whatever the degree
of religious belief or nationalist feelings there may be at any given
moment in time, this cannot stop the class contradictions that exist in
capitalist society from eventually coming to the surface.

This is what we wrote one year ago:

“It would be a mistake to ascribe ‘supernatural’ powers to the Islamists
and other counterrevolutionary forces, which somehow allegedly allow them
to stand above society and the class struggle. The main point to understand
is that these forces are all different shades of bourgeois parties who all
defend the rule of capital. But as long as they defend the rule of capital,
they must accept the logic of capitalism. They must therefore defend the
crisis of capitalism, which at present does not allow for even the smallest
and most basic concessions to the masses.

“If all this had happened ten years ago, they might have been able to
consolidate some form of bourgeois democratic regimes. The boom in world
capitalism would have given them some margin for manoeuvring. But now there
is a profound crisis on a world scale. This is both the reason for the
revolutionary ferment and the reason why it cannot easily be brought to an
end.” (One Year Since Bouazizi’s Death — One Year of Arab
Revolution<http://www.marxist.com/arab-revolution-first-anniversary.htm>,
Hamid Alizadeh, 16 December 2011)

Yesterday’s show of force fully confirms what we said. The revolution has
chased away the thugs of the Islamists and has left all the forces of
reaction in a state of shock and paralysis. Unable to do anything, they
could only watch and hope that the masses would show them mercy. Had there
been a revolutionary leadership of the movement, yesterday’s protest could
have been turned into a new revolution sweeping away all the remnants of
the old society. But the lack of such a force meant that the regime, though
weak and unstable, is still standing.

The masses want democracy, and we support them in this demand, but we also
explain that the present state of things is the best that bourgeois
democracy can offer in Egypt. The Marxists had foreseen the events that are
now unfolding, but because of the weakness of the numerical weakness of the
Marxist Tendency we are not able to bring these ideas to the movement as a
whole. Therefore the masses will have to learn these lessons themselves
through painful experience.

Contrary to what bourgeois “experts” and sceptics on the left would have us
believe, the Arab masses are not inherently prone to supporting reactionary
Islamic fundamentalism. In fact the real traditions of the workers in Egypt
and the rest of the region are Socialist and leftist.

And as the tide of the revolution goes back and forth these old traditions
will once again be rediscovered on a mass scale and this is because within
the confines of the capitalist system not even the most basic needs of the
masses can be met.

Only the ideas of scientific socialism, i.e. Marxism, can show a way
forward. Thus, the task of the day is to build a force within the Egyptian
labour movement based on these ideas. By studying the experiences of the
past and patiently explaining them to the workers and the youth our ideas
will gain an echo within the revolution. Once this is achieved the road
will be open to a genuine socialist revolution that will put an end to the
capitalist system, which Morsi loyally serves.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to