Crap.
How can I even think that things are worse then I thought. Not that I think they are doing more and doing worse things then I thought, but, that they are doing it with such impunity, with basically no out cry from the people of this nation as a whole, that all of the news Corporate Big Brother Controls, can cast such a pall of silence over the vast majority, that only a few Mr Smiths even hear anything beyond the din of the FEAR and Entertainment Media. If you can hear me, or better yet hear Mr Englehardt, pass this along to someone that hasn't heard. Someday they'll be able to get it, and this time might be it. Don't waste the change, educate and mobilize. In the street is what they fear and they Fear PEACE most of all. Scott > > Tomgram: Engelhardt, The Washington Straitjacket > by Tom Engelhardt > December 4, 2012. > > The Barack Obama Story (Updated) > How a Community Organizer and Constitutional Law Professor Became a Robot > President > By Tom Engelhardt > > President Barack Obama > The White House > 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW > Washington, D.C. 20500 > > Dear President Obama, > > Nothing you donât know, but let me just say it: the worldâs a weird > place. In my younger years, I might have said âcrazy,â but that was > back when I thought being crazy was a cool thing and only regretted I > wasnât. > > I mean, do you ever think about how you ended up where you are? And I'm > not actually talking about the Oval Office, though thatâs undoubtedly a > weird enough story in its own right. > > After all, you were a community organizer and a constitutional law > professor and now, if you stop to think about it, hereâs where youâve > ended up: youâre using robots to assassinate people you personally pick > as targets. > > Youâve overseen and escalated off-the-books robot air wars in Pakistan, > Somalia, and Yemen, and are evidently considering expanding them to Mali > and maybe even Libya. > > Youâve employed what will someday be defined as a weapon of mass > destruction, launching historyâs first genuine cyberwar against a > country that isnât threatening to attack us. > > Youâve agreed to the surveillance of more Americans every which way from > Sunday than have ever been listened in on or (given emailing, texting, and > tweeting) read. > > You came into office proclaiming a âsunshineâ policy and yet your > administration has classified more documents (92,064,862 in 2011) than any > other in our history. > > Despite signing a Whistleblower Enhancement Protection Act, youâve used > the Espionage Act on more government whistleblowers and leakers than all > previous administrations combined, and yet your officials continue to leak > secret material they see as advantageous to the White House without fear > of prosecution. > > Though you deep-sixed the Bush administration name for it -- âthe Global > War on Terrorâ (ridding the world of GWOT, one of the worst acronyms > ever) -- youâve accepted the idea that we are âat warâ with terror > and on a âglobal battlefieldâ which (see above) youâre actually > expanding. > > Youâre still keeping uncharged, untried prisoners of not-quite-war in an > offshore military prison camp of injustice that, on the day you came into > office, you promised to close within a year. > > Youâre overseeing planning that, according to recent reports, will > continue the Afghan War in some form until at least 2017 or possibly well > beyond. > > You preside over an administration that has encouraged the further > militarization of the CIA (to which you appointed as director not a > civilian but a four-star general you assumedly wanted to tuck safely away > during campaign season). > > Youâve overseen the further militarization of the State Department; > youâve encouraged a major expansion of the special operations forces and > its secret presidential army, the Joint Special Operations Command, > cocooned inside the U.S. military. > > Youâve overseen the further post-9/11 expansion of an already staggering > national security budget and the further growth of our labyrinthine > âIntelligence Communityâ -- and though who remembers anymore, you even > won what must have been the first prospective Nobel Prize for Peace more > or less before you did a damn thing, and then thanked the Nobel Committee > with a full-throated defense of the right of the U.S. to do what it > pleased, militarily, on the planet! > > And if that isnât a weird legacy-in-formation, what is? > > I mean, you have my sympathies. The Bush administration did you no favors. > You inherited hell for a foreign policy and when it came to matters like > Guantanano, the Republicans in Congress hung you out to dry. > > Still, who woulda thunk it? Donât these âaccomplishmentsâ of yours > sometimes amaze you? Donât you ever wake up in the middle of the night > wondering just who you are? Donât you, like me, open your eyes some > mornings in a state of amazement about just how you ended up on this > particular fast-morphing planet? Are you as stunned as I am by the fact > that a tanker carrying liquid natural gas is now making a trip from Norway > to Japan across the winter waters of the Arctic? Twenty days at sea lopped > off an otherwise endless voyage via the Mediterranean Sea, and the Indian > and Pacific Oceans. Did you ever think youâd live to see the opening of > the Northeast Passage in winter? Donât you find it ironic that fossil > fuels, which helped burn that oceanic hole in the Arctic ice, were the > first commercial products shipped through those open waters? Donât you > find it just a tad odd that you can kill someone in distant Yemen without > the slightest obstacle and yet youâve been able to do next to nothing > when it comes to global warming? I mean, isnât that world-championship > weird, believe-it-or-not bizarre, and increasingly our everyday reality? > > Arenât you amazed that your Pentagon has recently issued a directive > meant to ensure that armed robots will never kill human beings on their > own? Not so long ago, that was the stuff of sci-fi; now, itâs the > subject of a bureaucratic document. Tell that to Skynet someday, right? > > Who could make this stuff up? Maybe William Gibson -- maybe he already did > -- but not me and my guess is not you either. > > Putting Yourself in a Box > I know that we humans are terrible at predicting the future. Still, if I > had told you back in, say, 2003 that, in the wake of a lawless > administration, we would vote a constitutional lawyer into the White House > as a âpeace candidateâ and heâd do exactly what youâve done so far > (see, again, above), you wouldnât have believed it, would you? And if I > had told you it would be you, Iâll put my money on your laughing me out > of any room (not that Iâve ever been in a room with you). > > Just the other day, something leaked by two âadministration officialsâ > onto the front-page of the New York Times got me started on this letter. > In a piece headlined âElection Spurred a Move to Codify U.S. Drone > Policy,â reporter Scott Shane wrote that, fearing you might lose to Mitt > Romney, you were rushing to develop âa formal rule book,â including > âexplicit rules for the targeted killing of terrorists by unmanned > drones, so that a new president would inherit clear standards and > procedures.â You won the election, of course, but Shane claims youâre > âstill pushingâ -- though at a far more leisurely pace -- âto make > the rules formal and resolve... exactly when lethal action is > justified.â > > To use your term, you are putting âa legal architectureâ in place for > a process of White House-directed robotic assassination -- you call them > âtargeted killingsâ -- that will assumedly be long-lasting. These are > acts that in the years before 9/11, as Shane points out, Washington used > to condemn when Israel committed them and that most countries consider > illegal to this day. > > I understand why the idea of Mitt Romney as assassin-in-chief made you > nervous and why you wanted to put him in a straitjacket of drone > codification. But itâs hard not to ask -- and Iâm not the first to do > so -- what about you? Itâs human nature to trust ourselves over the > other guy, but has it occurred to you that some of us might have the same > reaction to you at the helm of a globalizing robot war as you had to Mitt? > > In any case, havenât you already managed to do to yourself what you > planned to do to him -- without cutting down the killing appreciably, > including the deaths of civilians, children, at least four American > citizens, and a Yemeni deputy provincial governor who had nothing to do > with al-Qaeda? If press reports are to be believed, youâve already been > fully involved in regularizing, bureaucratizing, legalizing, and codifying > your drone wars. In other words, youâve put yourself deep inside a > developing system in which you no longer have a hope in hell of imagining > the world any other way. > > Hereâs a little history of the process (not that you of all people > donât already know it): You inherited an ad hoc Bush administration > program of CIA drone strikes in the Pakistani tribal borderlands that > started in 2004 and was originally aimed at top al-Qaeda types. But as > will happen, those âtargeted killingsâ became ever less targeted, > spreading to lower level al-Qaeda types, Taliban leaders, Taliban "foot > soldiers," and finally what came to be called âsignature strikesâ > against âpatterns of behavior.â (A group of military-age males with > weapons, say, in an area believed to be controlled by Islamic extremists.) > > We know that President Bush took you aside at the changeover moment and > urged you to continue the drone wars in Pakistan (along with his cyberwar > program against Iran). And though it must have been very new to you, you > did so, expanding them in Pakistan and extending them in a major way to > Yemen, while ever more drone bases were built in key areas of the world > and ever more drones ordered up. > > As this happened, those wars became ever less ad hoc, ever more organized > and bureaucratic. A regular process for deciding on individual > âtargetsâ came into being. You had your âbaseball cardsâ > (PowerPoint slides on potential individuals to target) that you discussed > in your regular âTerror Tuesdayâ meetings. Where once George W. Bush > kept in his desk drawer a âpersonal scorecard,â a list of bad guys to > cross out whenever one of them was killed, you now have an official > âkill list.â Where once these strikes were just launched, you got the > Office of Legal Counsel to produce a 50-page legalistic justification for > using drones to kill a U.S. citizen. It and other legal memos on drone use > have never been released to the public or even to congressional leaders. > Still, your top officials feel free to use them to their advantage in > public defense of U.S. counterterror policies. (Note that the Bush > administration did the same thing with its torture policies, producing > Justice Department âtorture memosâ that âlegalizedâ acts which, in > almost any other context, or if committed by any enemy nation, would have > been denounced as nightmarish acts of international illegality and that, > in the past, the U.S. had prosecuted as crimes of war.) > > Now, Shane reports, youâve had the urge to codify it all and so > institutionalize a presidential right to conduct assassination campaigns > without regard to Congress, the American people, national sovereignty, the > world, or previous standards of legality. And that is an accomplishment of > the first order. I mean -- Voilà ! -- youâve officially created the box > that no one can think outside of. > > You are -- so the story goes -- the most powerful man on Earth. From the > Oval Office, you should have the widest of wide-angle views. But sometimes > donât you feel that youâre trapped like a rat inside a maze in part > (but only in part) of your own creation? > > Dreaming Before Itâs Too Late > Of course, Iâve never gotten nearer to the Oval Office than Pennsylvania > Avenue, so what do I know about how it's like there? Still, Iâm older > than you and I do know how repetitive acts rigidify, how one possible way > morphs into the only way, how one limited system of living comes to seem > like the only option on Earth. It happens with age. It also happens in > Washington. > > The other day, I noted this little passage in a New York Times report on > the discovery of huge quantities of ice on Mercury: âSean C. Solomon, > the principal investigator for [the spacecraft] Messenger, said there was > enough ice there to encase Washington, D.C., in a frozen block two and a > half miles deep.â I couldnât help smiling. After all, the Washington I > read about already seems enclosed in a block of ice, which is why, when it > comes to the world, it so seldom thinks a new thought or acts in a new > way. > > If only you could reverse time and take a step back into the world of the > community organizer. After all, what does such an organizer do, if not > try to free people from the rigidities of their lives, the boxes they > canât think outside of, the blocks of ice theyâre encased in, the acts > that have come to dominate them and regularly wipe out any sense of > alternative possibilities? Whatâs the point of community organizing if > not to allow people to begin to imagine other ways of being and becoming? > > Maybe you donât even realize how youâve been boxed into, and boxed > yourself into, the codifications from hell, almost all based on our > militarizing way of life. Outside that box where the bureaucratized > killing takes place, where the âwarsâ are fought, and the battle plans > are endlessly recalibrated in ways too familiar to matter, outside the > airless world of the National Security Complex where one destructive set > of ways has become the only way, there surely are other possibilities that > could result in other kinds of worlds. After all, just because youâre > trapped in a box doesnât mean that the world is. Look at the Middle > East. For better or worse, it visibly isnât. > > Back in 2009 when you first took office, I wrote a speech for you. In it, > âyouâ told the American people that you were âending, not expanding, > two wars.â I knew that you would never give such a speech (no less read > mine), but I did believe that, despite the âwisdomâ of Washington, you > could indeed have put both of Bushâs wars -- Iraq and Afghanistan -- > behind you. Weâll never know, of course. You chose another path, a > âsurgeâ of 30,000 troops, CIA operatives, special forces operators, > private contractors, and State Department types that led to yet more > disastrous years in Afghanistan. > > Unfortunately, the ghostly what-ifs of history count for nothing. Still, > havenât you ever wondered whether something else wasn't possible? > Whether, for instance, sending bombs and missiles into poverty-stricken, > essentially energy-less, essentially foodless Yemen was really and truly > the way to world peace? > > My apologies! I let sarcasm get the better of me. How about: really and > truly the way to enhance U.S. national security? Honestly, Yemen? Most > Americans couldnât find it on the map to win the lottery, and according > to reports, American drone and air strikes have actually increased > membership in al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. And yet you wonât stop. > You probably canât. > > Similarly, donât you ever wonder whether a âpivotâ to Asia, mainly > involving military power and guaranteed to exacerbate regional relations > in the Pacific is the best way to deal with the rising power of China? > After all, what would it mean to go to war with the country which now > holds well more than $1 trillion in U.S. debt? Wouldnât it be like > shooting ourselves in the foot, if not the head? > > And donât you ever wonder whether a labyrinth of 17 (yes, 17!) major > agencies and outfits in the U.S. âIntelligence Communityâ (and even > more minor ones), spending at least $75 billion annually, really makes us > either safe or smart? Mightnât we be more âintelligentâ and less > paranoid about the world if we spent so much less and relied instead on > readily available open-source material? > > I mean, there are so many things to dream about. So many ghostly > possibilities to conjure up. So many experimental acts that offer at least > a chance at another planet of possibility. It would be such a waste if you > only reverted to your community-organizer or constitutional-law self after > you left office, once âretirement syndromeâ kicked in, once those > drones were taking off at the command of another president and it was too > late to do a thing. You could still dream then, but what good would those > dreams do us or anyone else? > > > > Tom Engelhardt, co-founder of the American Empire Project and author of > The United States of Fear as well as The End of Victory Culture, his > history of the Cold War, runs the Nation Institute's TomDispatch.com. His > latest book, co-authored with Nick Turse, is Terminator Planet: The First > History of Drone Warfare, 2001-2050. You can see his recent interview > with Bill Moyers on supersized politics, drones, and other subjects by > clicking here. > > Follow TomDispatch on Twitter @TomDispatch and join us on Facebook. Check > out the newest Dispatch book, Nick Turseâs The Changing Face of Empire: > Special Ops, Drones, Proxy Fighters, Secret Bases, and Cyberwarfare. > > Copyright 2012 Tom Engel > > > ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
