http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/02/05/12142/secret-us-detention-program-had-many-foreign-collaborators

Secret US detention program had many foreign collaborators
A new report details the involvement of dozens of countries in rough
treatment, without accountability
By Douglas Birch
<http://www.publicintegrity.org/authors/douglas-birch><https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=DMalcolmBirch><http://www.publicintegrity.org/node/12065/rss>
 4 hours, 54 minutes ago Updated: 4 hours, 37 minutes ago
Advertisement
1
likes
20
tweets
Comment<http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/02/05/12142/secret-us-detention-program-had-many-foreign-collaborators#comments>
E-mail <http://www.publicintegrity.org/printmail/node/12142>
Print <http://www.publicintegrity.org/print/12142>
<http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/02/05/12142/secret-us-detention-program-had-many-foreign-collaborators>
Romanian special police officers patrol the area where a U.S. Air Force
C130 is parked on the Mihail Kogalniceanu airfield, near the Black Sea port
of Constanta, Romania, in this Feb. 21, 2003 file photo. AP

At least 54 countries aided the CIA in its sweeping post-9/11 program of
secret detentions, renditions and interrogations of more than 136 terror
suspects, according to a human rights group report released Tuesday that
amounts to the most comprehensive look at the shadowy program to date.

 In addition to demonstrating the sheer size of the secret program, the
report details the failure of most of the countries involved to hold anyone
accountable.

Ranking U.S. officials “bear responsibility for authorizing” violating the
rights of those caught up in the CIA’s effort post-9/11 campaign, the Open
Society Justice Initiative report says. But the group says the foreign
governments who worked with the U.S. are also culpable, because they played
a bigger role than previously realized.

Without their help the effort could never have been carried out, said the
report, which draws on a host of public sources – including investigations
by human rights groups -- and previous studies.

It  describes extremely rough treatment of detainees, including beatings,
sleep-deprivation, water-boardings and the jailing of suspects in
coffin-like cells. Moroccan authorities promised to treat British resident
Binyam Mohamed humanely after CIA officers delivered him to them for
interrogation. But the report says his questioners sliced his genitals,
poured hot liquid on his penis, broke his bones and threatened him with
rape, electrocution and death.

The author of the Open Society report, Amrit Singh, is a former staff
attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, where she helped pursue a
lawsuit against the Defense Department that resulted in the disclosure of
thousands of documents about the abuse of prisoners held by the U.S. abroad.

The report comes a day after the leak of a Department of Justice white
paper to NBC News detailing the legal basis for the Obama administration’s
use of lethal force against terror suspects, including U.S. citizens. The
unsigned and undated memo said an informed, high level official could order
the death of a ranking terrorist who posed “an imminent threat of violent
attack” against the U.S., if it wasn’t possible to capture him.

While the white paper didn’t name any individual, the policy it explains
was followed in the case of Anwar al-Aulaqi, an American and a high-level
al-Qaida official killed by a U.S. missile in Yemen in 2011. Sen. Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., hailed the publication of the document in a statement
Tuesday, saying now Americans can “review and judge the legality of these
operations.”

Former Bush administration officials and others who have defended the
rendition and interrogation efforts have said they were a necessary and
effective part of the effort to track down terrorists targeting the United
States, including the leadership of al Qaida. Critics say that they were
illegal and that the harsh interrogations were ineffective in advancing the
U.S. war against Islamist militants.

Most of the countries identified in the report as participants in the
detention and interrogation program are staunch U.S. allies, among them
Canada, Germany, Britain, Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Afghanistan,
Lithuania, Morocco, Poland, Romania and Thailand all hosted CIA “black
sites,” or secret prisons, it states.

But the report notes that some regimes with at least a history of hostility
to the United States, including Syria, Iran and Libya, were also enlisted .
At least eight militants were handed over to Syria’s President Bashar
al-Assad, the report says. One detainee spent  10 months in a tiny
grave-sized cell, beaten with cables and threatened with electrocution.

Most of the countries involved have never effectively investigated their
actions, the report says. Only Italian officials been convicted for their
involvement and only Canada has issued an apology to former detainees.

Polish prosecutors are investigating its alleged CIA prison near the town
of Szczytno in north eastern Poland, and the European Court of Human Rights
has ordered the declassification of some documents about the prison
supplied by the Polish government. The country’s deputy foreign minister
warned that release of the documents would limit Poland’s ability to
cooperate with the investigation.

After President Obama took office he denounced torture but authorized the
short-term detention of terror suspects and declined to convene a
commission to investigate previous abuses. The Senate Select Committee on
intelligence in December approved a comprehensive report on the program,
but the report remains classified.

U.S. courts have declined to hear lawsuits brought by detainees, saying
that the cases raise major foreign policy and national security issues. The
government has released the names of just 16 of the post 9/11 detainees and
has refused to confirm the locations of all of the secret CIA prisons
abroad.

The black sites and rendition programs didn’t just foster human rights
abuses, the report says, they distorted the U.S. response to the threat of
terror. Libyan national Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi, was arrested in Pakistan in
2001 and later flown to Egypt. While under torture there, he fabricated
reports of Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons training of Al Qaida –
reports on which the U.S. relied in making its case for war against Iraq in
2003.

Egypt is believed to have received the greatest number of prisoners from
the U.S. rendition program and cooperated closely with Washington. Al-Libi
was only one of a number of suspects detained, interrogated, tortured and
abused by Egyptian authorities. Some were executed, the report states. U.S.
interrogators would often give questions for detainees in the morning and
receive responses that evening.

German intelligence officials helped interrogate at least one of the
detainees, Mohammad Haydar Zammar. A German national, he was captured in
Morocco in December of 2001 and taken to Syria’s notorious Far’ Falestin
prison. According to the report, citing European Parliament and other
official accounts, German intelligence officers were allowed to question
Zammar after charges were dropped against several Syrians in Germany.

In March 2002 Iran handed over 15 suspects to the government of
Afghanistan, which transferred ten of them to U.S. custody. The report said
the transfer was part of an arms-length trade of prisoners between
Washington and Tehran, an example of the short-lived post-9/11
collaboration between the two nations. The report said one of them, Amin
al-Yafia, believed captured in Iran in 2002, “may have been held” in CIA
custody at some later date. His current location is unknown.

Documents captured in Tripoli in 2011, after Gaddafi’s fall, suggest that
the U.S. sent Libya at least 11 terror suspects after 9/11 despite the
regime’s reputation for torturing suspects, the report states. All were
held secretly and some abused, it says, despite assurances their rights
would be respected. One of the detainees, Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq, claimed he
was tortured by two CIA officers in Bangkok before his rendition to Libya.
He became the new security chief in Tripoli following the death of the
Libyan strongman.

*The release of “Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detention and
Extraordinary Rendition,” drew wide attention Feb. 4 and 5, with articles
published in the New York Times, The Guardian, Wired, NBCNews.com and other
media. Open Society Foundations is one of the Center for Public Integrity’s
major institutional funders.*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to