Obama’s 2013 State of the Union Address: Tragedy Has Many Faces

Posted on February 14, 2013 by dsalaborblogmoderator
by Dr. Jack Rasmus


Jack Rasmus

On February 12, 2013, President Obama delivered his State of the Union address. 
He concluded with an emotional appeal for gun control, repeating a call for 
Congress to at least put the matter of gun control to a vote after referencing 
the Newtown, Ct., tragic massacre of 26 children and other recent acts of gun 
violence in the US. It was an emotional high point of his address, and a very 
moving moment.

But there was another reference in his speech that also addressed life and 
death matters, potentially impacting not 26 but hundreds of thousands of those 
other of America’s most vulnerable—our senior population.

Earlier in his address, Obama declared “the biggest cause of the nation’s long 
term debt” was “medical for the aged”, in other words, Medicare. Saying this, 
Obama repeated his remarks of January 1, 2013, when he publicly declared on TV, 
while supporting the agreement in Congress to raise token taxes on the 
wealthiest 1%, that Medicare was the biggest contributing source to the deficit 
and debt.

Reference to Medicare as the main cause of deficit and debt is of course 
blatantly false. As this writer has documented elsewhere in detail in several 
articles, the main causes of the $10 trillion additional run-up in deficits and 
debt since 2001 have been the Bush tax cuts ($3.4 trillion of the total), 
excess inflationary war spending ($2.1 trillion), tax cuts for the rich and 
corporations and other stimulus spending since 2008 ($3 trillion), and loss of 
tax revenue due to 5 years of more than 20 million still unemployed.

Obama’s fixation on Medicare as the prime target for deficit cutting is 
therefore disturbing. All the more so since he’s been calling for massive 
Medicare cuts for the past two years. To recall, last November he proposed $340 
billion in Medicare cuts. And in July 2011 proposed $700 billion as part of a 
‘grand bargain’. Massive cuts to Medicare have been on his mind for some time. 
But even more disturbing in his February 12 address was his statement that he 
agreed with and supported the Simpson-Bowles Deficit Commission’s 2010 
proposals for cutting Medicare.

If you don’t know what Simpson-Bowles proposed back in November 2010 for 
reducing Medicare, allow me to enlighten you. Simpson-Bowles proposed a new 
$550 annual deductible for Part A (hospital) and Part B (physician) Medicare 
coverage. In addition to that $550, they also proposed that seniors now pay a 
20% copay for Part A coverage as well as the present 20% copay for Part B 
coverage. Those seniors who can afford it, currently purchase additional 
supplemental private insurance to cover the 20% Part B copay. That typically 
costs from $150 to $300 a month. Presumably, the additional 20% copay for Part 
A would cost about the same additional $150 to $300 a month. So to keep their 
current part A hospital coverage they now have, seniors would have to pay out 
of pocket another $150 to $300 a month—in addition to the new $550 deductible 
for Part A & B.

The Simpson-Bowles proposal for Medicare means seniors will pay an additional 
$195 to $345 a month out of pocket for the same level of Part A and Part B 
coverage they now have.

The new $550 deductible means another $45 a month taken out of their monthly 
social security retirement checks, in addition to the current roughly $105 a 
month taken out for Part B coverage. That’s a major hit to monthly retirement 
checks from social security, which today averages only a mere $1100 a month. 
Plus the $150-$300 directly out of pocket for supplemental Part A insurance.

In short, that’s Simpson-Bowles. That’s what Obama called for. And that’s a 
financial disaster for tens of millions on Social Security-Medicare.

The other tragedy in Obama’s SOTU address was jobs. The proposals raised were 
rehashed old programs, like his September 2011 ‘jobs’ bill; more subsidies and 
tax breaks for multinational corporations and manufacturers; a token 
infrastructure spending proposal with no details; and a pre-school education 
proposal that was strangely offered as the first step toward a ‘job retraining’ 
bill.

The President also called for an Immigration bill, much needed no doubt. But 
that bill is currently being drafted in part by business interests, 
multinational tech companies in particular. As part of the immigration deal, 
multinational tech companies will be allowed to double the quota of jobs given 
to foreign skilled engineers from their offshore subsidiaries, raising the 
annual total of jobs under the H1-B visa program from current 65,000 to 
130,000. So jobs will be created by the immigration bill, but not for American 
college youth, who are now being crushed under a mountain of student debt with 
little guarantee of a high paying job upon graduation. (And instead of 
expunging that debt in whole or part, as has been done for the banks these past 
five years, the President merely exhorted colleges and universities to stop 
raising annual tuition by double digit rates).

But the real jobs tragedy was President Obama’s proposal to conclude the nearly 
completed ‘Transpacific Partnership Program’—a euphemism for a Pacific-wide 
Free Trade on Steroids treaty that will dwarf the job loss impact of NAFTA 
since 1994 and preferred trade rights given to China since 2000. Those two 
major trade deals cost, at minimum, 5 million lost jobs. TPP will cost 
magnitudes more in terms of job loss. And that’s not all. Obama further called 
for replicating TPP Free Trade with a similar treaty with the European Union, a 
‘TransAtlantic Partnership Program’, or TAP.

In summary, the State of the Union address on February 12, was proof, once 
again, that everything changes but nothing changes with the two parties in 
Washington. There is still no serious job creation program, only more free 
trade job destruction proposals and still more subsidies to multinationals and 
manufacturers. Meanwhile, if you’re long term unemployed and older than five 
years old, forget about job retraining. And if you’re a senior, expect to foot 
much of the deficit cutting bill through higher out of pocket payments for 
Medicare and thus fewer dollars in your social security retirement checks. And 
if you’re a student, expect to have to continue to pile on more debt in 
exchange for low paying service jobs when they graduate. 

Dr. Jack Rasmus  is the author of the 2012 book, “Obama’s Economy: Recovery for 
the Few”, published by Palgrave-Macmillan and Pluto press. His website is: 
www.kyklosproductions.com; his blog is: jackrasmus.com; and he can be reached 
on twitter at @drjackrasmus.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to