Our Atomic Dominoes are Falling
  
Two more atomic dominoes have hit the deck. 
At least a half-dozen more teeter on the brink, which would take the US reactor 
count under 100. 
But can we bury them before the next Fukushima erupts? 
And will we still laugh when Fox "News" says there's more sun in Germany than 
California? 
Wisconsin's fully licensed Kewaunee reactor will now shut because it can't 
compete in the marketplace. 
Florida's Crystal River will die because its owners poked holes in the 
containment during a botched repair job. 
UBS and other financial experts say Entergy is bleeding cash at Vermont 
Yankee.  After blacking out the SuperBowl, Entergy has no problem 
stiffing a state that has sued to shut its only reactor. 
But in the face being crushed by renewables and gas, the money men may finally 
pull the plug. 
The same could happen to New York's Fitzpatrick and Ginna reactors, as 
well as the two at Indian Point, which need water permits and more from 
an increasingly hostile state.  New Jersey's Oyster Creek, slammed by 
Hurricane Sandy, and Nebraska's Ft. Calhoun, recently flooded, are also 
on the brink. 
The list of crippled, non-competitive and near-dead reactors lengthens 
daily.  Few are more critical than San Onofre Units Two and Three, 
perched on an ocean cliff in the earthquake-tsunami zone between Los 
Angeles and San Diego. 
More than 8 million people live within a 50-mile radius of where San 
Onofre's owners botched a $600 million steam generator replacement.  As 
radiation leaked, they may have lied to federal regulators, prompting US 
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Representative Ed Markey (D-MA) to 
demand an investigation. 
After being down more than a year, Unit Three will almost certainly 
never reopen.  Unit Two may well stay shut at least through the summer. 
If a rising grassroots movement can bury them both, it will mark a huge 
turning point in a state where renewables are booming with new revenue 
and jobs. 
Which gets us to the Murdochian weather report.  A recent "Fox & 
Friends" was mystified by Germany's popular (and very profitable) 
decision to phase out nukes while turning to solar, wind, increased 
efficiency and other Solartopian technologies. 
Finally, Shibani Joshi figured it out:  "They're a small country, and 
they've got lots of sun.  Right?  They've got a lot more sun than we 
do." 
The staggering laugh line that cold, dark Germany has more sunlight than a 
nation stretching from Hawaii to California to Florida could come 
only from an industry at dangerous odds with the planet on which it 
malfunctions. 
This latest stretch of shut downs does not mean the death of the 
industry.   Both Georgia and Florida are being assaulted with 
legislation that would allow utilities to build new reactors while 
ratepayers foot the bill. 
And some activists concerned about global warming still dream of 
carbon-free reactors they hope might someday alleviate the situation. 
But they miss the reality that such plants will likely never exist.  
Every promise this industry has made---from "too cheap to meter" to 
"reactors don't explode" to "radiation is good for you"---has turned 
toxic. 
They also forget that a fragile pool laden with enough fuel rods to 
poison countless millions still sways 100 feet in the air at Fukushima.  It 
remains horrifically vulnerable to seismic activity that could send 
it crashing down to a permanently contaminated earth. 
Overall the industry's back is dangerously to the wall.  We know it will 
squeeze every last cent from these dying reactors with less and less 
care for safety, especially since the federal government still insures 
them against the financial consequences of a major catastrophe.  Every 
day they operate heightens the odds on something truly apocalyptic to 
follow in the wake of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima. 
Meanwhile they continue to spew out huge quantities of heat and waste.  
They divert precious capital from the proven green technologies that are now 
revolutionizing our energy economy in the only ways that can 
possibly save us from climate chaos. 
This may yet become the first year in decades that the US has fewer than 100 
operating commercial reactors.  It will also be the biggest year 
worldwide for the booming Solartopian industries that are transforming 
how we get our energy, create our jobs and grow our economy. 
Lets just make sure we win that transition before the next radioactive disaster 
does its worst. 


http://www.nukefree.org/editorsblog/our-atomic-dominoes-are-falling


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to