http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/02/28/bradley-manning-describes-collateral-murder-video-as-war-porn/

Bradley Manning Describes ‘Collateral Murder’ Video as ‘War
Porn’<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/02/28/bradley-manning-describes-collateral-murder-video-as-war-porn/>
By: Kevin Gosztola
<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/author/kgosztola/> Thursday
February 28, 2013 6:10 pm

[image: 
Tweet]Tweet<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/02/28/bradley-manning-describes-collateral-murder-video-as-war-porn/#>
60
[image: 
digg]<http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://fdl.me/Xotvd5&title=Bradley+Manning+Describes+%27Collateral+Murder%27+Video+as+%27War+Porn%27+>
 [image: 
stumbleupon]<http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://fdl.me/Xotvd5&title=Bradley+Manning+Describes+%27Collateral+Murder%27+Video+as+%27War+Porn%27+>
  <http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/?p=13843&akst_action=share-this>

Sketch of Manning reading statement in court by Clark Stoeckley

In a military court at Fort Meade, Maryland, Pfc. Bradley Manning pled
guilty to unauthorized possession of certain information, to willfully
communicating that information to an unauthorized person, WikiLeaks, and
that the conduct was “service discrediting” or prejudicial to the good
order and discipline of the military.

As part of a thirty-five page statement read in court, Manning mentioned
that a fellow soldier in his division, the Tenth Mountain division, had
been discussing a video depicting several individuals being engaged by an
air weapons team.  The soldier,  Jihrleah Showman, was discussing a “war
porn” video depicting combat that was on a T-Drive. Showman and other
officers debated whether it violated rules of engagement.

The video “troubled” Manning. He conducted research because he wanted to
know what had happened. Through a Google search, he found the event by “its
date and general location.” Two Reuters employees had been killed.

He found a story that explained Reuters had requested a copy of the video
under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  Reuters wanted the video “in
order to understand what happened and improve safety practices in combat
zones.” Despite a FOIA request, Manning said CENTCOM replied that they
could not give a time frame for considering the request and the video might
not exist.” The request was still being reviewed, but Reuters had received
no written response. The fact that CENTCOM would not “voluntarily release”
the video “troubled” him “further.”

The attack had happened because the air weapons team had “mistakenly
identified” individuals as a “threat,” Manning stated. The van was not a
threat but had “Good Samaritans.”

“Most alarming” was the “bloodlust” of the air weapons team. “They
dehumanized the individuals they were engaging.” He was struck by what the
soldiers were saying in the audio. Also, one individual on the ground
attempting to crawl to safety was not helped. “Instead of calling for
medical attention,” the soldiers asked for the wounded person to pick up
weapons so they could fire at this individual. Manning also mentioned how
they called the targets “dead bastards.”

Manning said it was similar to a “child torturing an ant with a magnifying
glass.” The crew’s “lack of concern for human life” and “concern for
injured children at the scene” greatly bothered him.

He continued to do research and found an article on a book by *Washington
Post *reporter David Finkel called *The Good Soldiers. *Manning followed
Finkel’s account with the video and realized Finkel was quoting “verbatim
the aerial communications of the crew.”

Manning read an excerpt from Finkel’s book during his tenure in Iraq and
was aghast at the portrayal of the incident. “Reading his account, one
would believe it was justifiable payback for a previous attack that led to
death of a soldier,” Manning declared.

On the incident in general, he said it was, “All a bit of a mess.” He was
“left wondering what all this means and it [burdened] me emotionally.”

Manning searched for the Rules of Engagement annexes and flow chart from
the 2007 period and released that, along with the video, to WikiLeaks. The
video was provided to WikiLeaks before he was scheduled to redeploy from
Iraq. It was released on April 5, 2010.

He said in his statement he hoped the public would be “as alarmed  as me
about the content.” He wanted the American public “to know that not all
people were targets that needed to be neutralized” but “people living in
pressure cooker environment of asymmetrical warfare.” He reflected that
Americans had been troubled if not more troubled.

Manning expressed frustration that the Defense Department and CENTCOM would
not confirm the authenticity of the video. A superior officer, Cpt. Casey
Fulton, had stated to officers the released video from WikiLeaks was not
authentic. On February 25, 2010, he emailed Fulton a link to the video on
the T-Drive and the video on the WikiLeaks organization so she could
compare the two herself.

He burned a CD-RW containing the video, placed a classified sticker on it,
wrote “Reuters,” and intended to mail it after he redeployed so they could
“have a copy that was unquestionably authentic.”

*For more on proceedings today, here’s a post with
updates<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/02/28/bradley-manning-pleads-guilty-to-some-offenses-updates/>.
And here’s a prior report on how the US press failed
Manning<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/02/28/the-us-press-failed-bradley-manning/>
.*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to