*From: Sri Lanka Campaign Newsletter  *
*        <[email protected]>
*
*
*
*INFO **GRAPHIC'S**
*
**1 Sri Lanka's north is under military occupation*
**
<
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AswddFRoIK0/UUm-crya9JI/AAAAAAAAAVg/EcwToV-o1Qw/s1600/SRI_INFOGRAPHICS_FIG3.jpg
>

.***2 Mahinda Samarasinghe, the President's envoy, says the military is not*
*
involved in civilian life*
**
<
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-G_FoUqZIVsE/UUnBmLiLa9I/AAAAAAAAAVs/Cz-ylu9QlNU/s1600/SRI_infographic_fig3_B+(1).jpg
>
***3 The decreasing circles* *of accountability in Sri Lanka***
****
<
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ac9o7xIG3e4/UUnDAHp7_5I/AAAAAAAAAV4/oFqMMPYKT2Y/s1600/SRI_INFOGRAPHICS_FIG1.jpg
>

***4 The intensity of the conflict***
**
<
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-wXi25K170rU/UUnEe0DaK_I/AAAAAAAAAWA/PcFmNUYnGSM/s1600/SRI_INFOGRAPHICS_FIG4+(1).jpg
>

***5 Nepotism in Sri Lanka***
**
<
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PgfObVnwyMA/UUnGMcyVhvI/AAAAAAAAAWI/1jeNNmW-AZI/s1600/sri+figure_2_18.03.13.jpg
>
*
*--------------------------------------------------------------*
*
*
*http://www.ronridenour.com/*
*
*

Obama: The Worst US President
Ever<http://www.ronridenour.com/articles/2013/0309--rr.htm>
[March 9, 2013]

Hugo Chávez: Victim of US Germ
Warfare?<http://www.ronridenour.com/articles/2013/0308--rr.htm>
[March 8, 2013]

Sri Lanka to be tried for genocide against Tamils:
How will Cuba and its allies
respond?<http://www.ronridenour.com/articles/2012/1109--rr.htm>
[November 9, 2012]

--------------------------------------------------

[image: India votes against, Pakistan for Sri Lanka at UNHRC]
Tamil activists and students of various colleges shout slogans during a
protest against Sri Lanka’s for alleged war crimes in Chennai. (TOI photo
by BA Raju)


*Human Rights Council resolution on Sri Lanka crimes:*

*More of the same nonsense causes huge protests*


by Ron Ridenour


United Nation’s Human Rights Council’s passed a resolution on March 21, the
third in four

years, concerning Sri Lanka’s conduct towards Tamils. The vote was 25 for,
13 against with eight

abstentions. Those opposed rejected any criticism of Sri Lanka as “foreign
meddling”. (1)


The US-led resolution A/HRC/22/L.1 "Promoting Reconciliation and
Accountability in Sri Lanka"

“noted” that the National Action Plan put forward by Sri Lanka to implement
the recommendations

made in its own Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) “does
not adequately

address serious violations of international humanitarian law.”


Sri Lanka’s government is then called upon to conduct an "independent and
credible" investigation

into allegations of human rights violations.


One paragraph goes a bit further than the previous US-led resolution last
year. It expresses

“concern at the continuing reports of violations of human rights in Sri
Lanka, including enforced

disappearances, extra-judicial killings, torture and violations of the
rights of expression, association

and peaceful assembly, as well as intimidation of and reprisals against
human rights defenders,

members of civil society and journalists, threats to judicial independence
and the rule of law, and

discrimination on the basis of religion and belief.” (2)


While the US resolution also stated that Sri Lanka’s government (GoSL) has
failed to devolve

political authority to Tamils, it expressed thanks for having facilitated
“the visit of a technical

mission from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights.” It “notes”

the High Commissioner’s “call for an independent and credible international
investigation into

alleged violations of international human rights law and international
humanitarian law,” without

suggesting such itself. No remedies are demanded. The resolution simply
concludes by suggesting

further reports “monitoring progress”.


No more white-wash


A day before the vote, the greatest pro-Tamil protest in years took place
with upwards of one

million people in India’s state Tamil Nadu. They denounced the US-led
resolution as “ineffectual”

for calling upon the Sri Lanka government to investigate itself. Protestors
demanded that the GoSL

be investigated by an independent international body for its war crimes and
genocide against the

Tamil people.


Varieties of colorful actions, including civil disobedience, occurred in
several Tamil Nadu cities

and schools. People denounced the “empty resolution further diluted by New
Delhi.” They called

for a UN plebiscite for Tamils in the north of Sri Lanka. (3)


For the first time since the end of the civil war, significant numbers of
Tamils have publicly

protested the US for meaningless “slaps on the wrist”. Thousands of Tamils
in many countries in


the Diaspora demonstrated against the resolution, burning it before the US
embassy in several cities.

Protestors now view the US as actually “facilitating the agenda of the
genocidal state”.

Critics assert that the US and Europe are not seriously advancing the
rights of Tamils nor actually

sanctioning GoSL for its brutal war crimes, and certainly not its 65
year-long genocide against the

minority Tamils. They point out that the US, its side-kick Israel and NATO
countries, always aided

the Sri Lankan government.


The Western powers provided Sri Lanka’s military with weaponry, money,
counter-intelligence,

and training to win the long war against Tamil nationhood. Then, since
their mutual victory, the

Western axis criticizes the Asian government for having committed excesses.
This “human rights”

approach is the best of all possible worlds for Western dictates: world
domination for the cause of

humanity is what they say if you read between the lips of communicators for
globalization. (4)


China, Russia, Iran, India and Pakistan also militarily and economically
assisted Sri Lankan

governments in avoiding federalism for the two peoples—majority Sinhalese
and minority

Tamils—yet they did so without the hyperbole of “protecting human rights”.
Unfortunately, Cuba

and its seven associates in the Latin American-nation Bolivarian Alliance
of the peoples of the

Americas (ALBA) got caught up in the geo-political game and supported Sri
Lanka.


The two ALBA countries on the Council, Ecuador and Venezuela, voted for Sri
Lanka’s stance,

while six other Latin American countries voted to criticize it. The Africa
and Asian governments

were divided in three ways. There was no obvious “first world,” “third
world” juxtaposition. (1)


The conciliatory role India’s Congress party-led government plays to
placate Sri Lanka with

massive economic aid, and by diluting the original draft of the both 2012
and 2013 resolutions,

led the Tamil Nadu DMK (Dravida Munnetra Kazhagan) party to withdraw its
participation in the

coalition UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government. By losing 18 seats
in the government,

including the minority party’s five ministers, Congress President Sonia
Gandhi felt compelled to

state that, “We are fully committed to the cause of Lankan Tamils and an
impartial inquiry should

happen into the allegations of atrocities against them.”


Apparently, at the last minute, the weakened UPA government leadership
tried to amend the final

draft with stronger words, according to the newspaper “The Hindu”.


However, DMK Chief Muthuvel Karunanidhi said, “There were no strong words
of censure

against Sri Lanka in that resolution, which indicated that there was no
scope at all to incorporate

amendments suggested by the DMK like including the word ‘genocide’.”


Karunanidhi said, on March 19, this justified the decision to pull out of
the government, which

forces the Congress party to rely even more so on opposition parties, in
order to continue to rule.


The new resolution has not ceded to demands of human rights bodies and
almost all Tamil political

parties and grass roots organizations for an independent international
investigation, which UN High

Commissioner for Human Rights Navaneetham Pillay also asserts is necessary.


She has consistently upheld the findings of the “Report of the
Secretary-General’s Panel of Experts

on Accountability in Sri Lanka” delivered to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
on March 31, 2011.


“The Panel found credible allegations associated with the final stages of
the war. Between


September 2008 and 19 May 2009, the Sri Lanka Army advanced its military
campaign into the

Vanni using large-scale and widespread shelling causing large numbers of
civilian deaths. This

campaign constituted persecution of the population of the Vanni. Around
330,000 civilians were

trapped into an ever decreasing area, fleeing the shelling but kept hostage
by the LTTE [Liberation

Tigers of Tamil Eelam]. The Government sought to intimidate and silence the
media and other

critics of the war through a variety of threats and actions, including the
use of white vans to abduct

and to make people disappear.


“The Government shelled on a large scale in three consecutive No Fire
Zones, where it had

encouraged the civilian population to concentrate, even after indicating
that it would cease the

use of heavy weapons. It shelled the United Nations hub, food distribution
lines and near the

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) ships that were coming to
pick up the wounded

and their relatives from the beaches. It shelled in spite of its knowledge
of the impact, provided by

its own intelligence systems and through notification by the United
Nations, the ICRC and others.

Most civilian casualties in the final phases of the war were caused by
Government shelling.”


The new resolution is virtually the same as the one put forth by the US
last March when the HRC

made a shift from the pro-Sri Lanka resolution of May 2009. In March 2012,
a majority (24 for,

15 against and 8 abstentions) voted to criticize the Sri Lankan government
for “not adequately

address[ing] serious allegations of violations of international law” when
conducting its final

phases of war against the liberation guerrilla army LTTE (Liberation Tigers
for Tamil Eelam).

Nevertheless, the statement simply asked the government to investigate
itself. (5)


Despite the UN panel of experts’ 214-page report and recommendations, and
those of the High

Commissioner, no session of the Human Rights Council has discussed those
recommendations.


While US-NATO conducts war crimes against several countries in the Middle
East and Africa,

progressive governments in Latin America, along with
Russia-China-Iran-Pakistan, view the US

role in Sri Lanka as hypocrisy. This motivates those governments to back
Sri Lanka as a “victim” of

US-European meddling. In so doing, they are silent about the crimes against
the Tamil people.


Venezuela, a new member on the HRC replacing Cuba, voted against the slap
wrist resolution.

Parting from journalistic style, I would suggest that Venezuela, in the
spirit of its recently deceased

leader, Hugo Chávez, would take the bull by the horns. Take the moral,
solidarity path and admit

war crimes wherever they are committed and oppose them. That goes for Sri
Lanka, and it goes

more so for the US-UK-NATO axis. Publicly chastise Sri Lanka for its
brutality, and then introduce

a new HRC resolution indicting the Western axis for the untold amount of
human blood and planet

destruction it causes with its aggressive profit-grabbing wars.


Future Actions


There is a shift in the wind. Tamils are righteously upset with the US-UK
axis. The multitude of

Tamil groups especially some international ones in the Diaspora, have
relied upon the axis to come

to their aid. After four years of getting nowhere, great numbers of Tamils
are awakened.


Some pro-Tamils groups are calling upon the Commonwealth Ministerial Action
Group (CMAG)

to prevent the Sri Lanka being rewarded as planned by hosting the
Commonwealth’s grand summit

this November.


The moderate Sri Lanka Campaign for Peace and Justice wrote: “If the
Commonwealth continues

as usual then the Government of Sri Lanka will be able to use this to
whitewash their crimes, and

derail the process of reconciliation. The cycle of violence will continue.”


The group initiated a petition to sign pressuring Commonwealth countries to
follow “the Canadian

Prime Minister's example and announcing that if the summit happens then
they will not go.” (6)


A more activist movement is expected to grow now!


Notes:

(1)* The Vote:*

*YES: Argentina, Austria, Benin, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Cöte d’Ivoire,
Czech Republic, Estonia,*

*Germany, Guatemala, India, Ireland, Italy, Libya, Montenegro, Peru,
Poland, Republic of North*

*Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Sierra Lone, Spain, Switzerland, USA*

*
*

*NO: Congo, Ecuador, Indonesia, Kuwait, Maldives, Mauritania, Pakistan,
Philippines, Qatar,*

*Thailand, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela*

*
*

*ABSTAIN: Angola, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Japan, Kazakhstan,
Kenya, Malaysia*

*
*

*NO VOTE: Gabon*

*
*

(2)
http://www.thehindu.com/news/unhrc-adopts-resolution-on-human-rights-violation-in-sri-lanka/

article4533969.ece

(3) http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=36151

(4) http://www.ronridenour.com/articles/2012/0525--rr.htm

(5) See: http://www.ronridenour.com/articles/2009/1116--rr.htm

http://www.ronridenour.com/articles/2012/0323--rr.htm

(6) )
http://www.change.org/petitions/prime-minister-david-cameron-do-not-attend-the-

commonwealth-summit


March 21, 2013

www.ronridenour.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to