Keystone XL And Native Americans: South Dakota Tribes Fight The 'Black Snake' 
Posted: 04/17/2013  7:15 pm EDT  |  Updated: 04/18/2013 10:06 am EDT  

 
Marie Brush Breaker Randall speaks to truck drivers en route to the Albertan 
tar sands. 
Debra White Plume and Marie Brush Breaker Randall stood in 
the middle of Highway 44, alongside more than 70 other members of the Oglala 
Lakota Nation. For hours, they didn't budge -- much to the chagrin of some 
tractor-trailer drivers bound for the tar sands region of Alberta, Canada.

"This is our land," said Randall, during the blockade in March 2012. 
"We have to protect" our grandchildren. Randall, then 92, appealed to 
the truckers attempting to pass through the sovereign territory in 
Wablee, S.D.: "Please stay out of our nation."
Randall's plea went beyond halting the truck caravan. She and other 
Native American activists share strong and broad opposition to the 
development of tar sands, including TransCanada's plan to send Canadian 
tar sands oil through the Keystone XL pipeline to the U.S. Gulf Coast. The 
White House final decision on the controversial conduit is expected this 
summer. 
Marie Randall is a well-respected elder, known as "Grandma Marie" by many 
Oglala Lakota. (Andrew Iron Shell)
Along the project's path, critics say, lie sacred and sensitive lands and 
waters that Native tribes rely on -- physically, culturally and 
spiritually. A growing number of tribes such as the Oglala Lakota are 
now pledging to stand their ground, fighting Keystone XL in defense of 
Mother Earth and future generations.
"When this black snake comes through here, there isn't another island for 
people to go live on," said White Plume, who was arrested for 
disorderly conduct during the human barricade.
The latest to join the fight in South Dakota are the Yankton Sioux, who vowed 
this month to block the Keystone XL Pipeline "by all means possible."
Tribal government officials will deliver two resolutions to the 
State Department hearing on Thursday in Grand Island, Neb. The Yankton 
resolution attempts to prove ties to the land that would be affected by 
the pipeline, but that aren't necessarily in the modern boundaries of 
their reservation. They also renounce a "flawed" process of consultation by the 
Department of State in its review of the proposed project. 
The State Department, in an email to The Huffington Post, said it 
"has taken the concerns of the tribal nations and other stakeholders 
into consideration" in preparing its draft environmental impact 
statement. The department noted that "tribal nations will have 
additional opportunities to provide input" through the public comment period, 
ending on April 22, and the department will "take any additional feedback from 
concerned tribes into consideration." 
Jennifer Baker, a Denver-based attorney who practices Indian law, 
said that consultation is "not happening" to the extent that it should 
be.
According to its draft review, the State Department consulted hundreds of times 
with tribes in person and via letter, email and phone. But Baker, who has been 
working with tribes and communities in South 
Dakota, said the government-to-government consultations, as required by 
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, have been too large, too 
short and often inaccessible for too many. 
"There's no way for them to fully express all of their concerns in the time 
allotted for a meeting," Baker said.
The "one and only public hearing" for the pipeline is another case in point, 
Baker told HuffPost while en route to Nebraska for the event. 
She said she knew many members of tribes who "desperately wanted to 
attend," but are unable to because of bad weather. 
"And these are older folks, elders, who really should be heard," said Baker.
Even Native Americans who attended meetings are "disheartened," Baker added. 
"They know going in no matter how strongly they feel and how 
right their position, in the end it has a very small likelihood of 
having an impact on what's happening."
The pipeline path skirts federal tribal land boundaries in South 
Dakota, Baker said, yet will still cut "almost through the heart" of a 
large protion of the land set aside for exclusive use by tribal nations, as 
recognized by the 1851 and 1868 Laramie Treaties. The pipe would cross native 
spiritual sites, burial grounds, hunting 
lands and sources of drinking water, including the Mni Wiconi pipeline, 
which transports water to the Oglala Lakota from the Missouri River. 
"There are so many bodies of water that this will cross," said Baker. "And it's 
absolutely inevitable that a spill will happen. It's just a matter of when and 
where." 
Baker emphasized the at-risk locations: "The pipeline goes through a 
lot of indigenous, minority and low-income communities. They are the 
least equipped to handle something like that, yet ones most at risk." 
What's more, Baker said, a spill would "destroy access to crucial 
components of their spirituality. That's not something that can be 
cleaned up and given back."
TransCanada spokesman, Shawn Howard said in a statement to HuffPost 
that the company has "made a reasonable and good-faith effort to 
identify tribes that may attach religious and cultural significance to 
historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, even if 
those tribes are located a great distance away from the project." 
Howard said that TransCanada has also been "actively working with 
tribes in exploring employment and business opportunities for both the 
construction and operations phases of the project."
White Plume said her people also have a name for corporations like 
TransCanada that are set to get rich off tar sands: "fat takers."
"The threat to our drinking water is so enormous that any number of 
jobs, any kind of economic development, would be irrelevant when our 
water is contaminated without the possibility of being cleaned up," said White 
Plume.
Debra White Plume is leading the Oglala Lakota in opposition to Keystone XL.
Despite assertions from TransCanada and the State Department, White 
Plume said that the "points of consideration" for her people have "not 
been considered."
The Oglala Lakota recently passed its own legislation opposing the pipeline, 
which brought out the activists -- including another elder in a wheelchair -- 
to Highway 44 that sunny day last year. 
Near a child holding a "Stop the Pipeline" sign stood White Plume wrapped in a 
banner that read, "Sacred Red Earth."
"The Mother Earth Accord has a moratorium on tar sands development. These are 
connected with tar sands development," she told the drivers, referencing their 
trucks. 
"You can't violate our laws to please a corporation or to please the 
state of South Dakota. Our laws are important."
White Plume has been helping to train her people for future peaceful protests 
through a program called Mocassins on the Ground.
Should President Barack Obama ultimately decide to approve Keystone 
XL, White Plume said the tribes will be ready: "The communities will be 
able to stand their ground and say 'no' even though he has said 'yes.'" 
"Obama has to realize he has 94-year-old grandmas and 10-year-old 
boys willing to risk arrest, do whatever has to be done to stop 
TransCanada from coming on our land," White Plume added. "Who is he 
standing for -- people or corporations?"
"Indians say no," said Randall. "This Indian momma says no."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/17/keystone-xl-native-americans-tribes_n_3102454.html


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to