Boston Marathon bombings unleash a new wave of Islamophobia

by Alex Kane on April 19, 2013 
 

An anti-Park 51 protester in New York City in September 2010 
(Photo: David Shankbone/Wikimedia Commons)
It’s happening again: another collective freakout steeped in 
Islamophobia. The Boston Marathon bombings have unleashed the 
anti-Muslim sentiment that bubbles under the surface and always shines 
bright in times of national hysteria. The current wave of Islamophobia 
the country is perpetuating and experiencing--and it’s only the 
beginning--is the first since the Park 51 fracas in 2010.
The news that the main suspects in the bombing are Chechen Muslims 
will fuel the ugly hate that has intensified since September 11. But the hate 
was unleashed immediately after the attack, even before the public knew that 
Muslims were involved. How little is needed for the brash and bigoted side of 
this country to come out swinging against the “Muslim 
enemy” we have been been so trained to fear.
It’s very easy to see the most blatant manifestations of the ugly 
phenomenon of Islamophobia, which casts collective blame on all Muslims. The 
right-wing is always the place to start. But it’s also emanating 
from our mainstream institutions and figures, where it’s a little more 
difficult to identify the Islamophobia. It’s there, though. Powerful 
institutions and figures are focusing on Muslims and trying to justify 
even more animus and surveillance targeting the Muslim community in the 
United States.
Let’s begin with the easiest of places: the Islamophobic media. The New York 
Postled the charge on this front. In the immediate hours after the Boston 
attack, the Rupert 
Murdoch-owned tabloid fingered a “Saudi national” who was injured in the blast 
as a suspect. It turns out he had nothing to do with the attack.
The other easy place to see anti-Muslim hate is, of course, the 
Islamophobic blogosphere. Pamela Geller went from freaking out about the Saudi 
to freaking out about two innocent people featured on the Post’s 
front page to freaking out about a missing university student to finally 
arriving at where everybody else is: freaking out about the Chechen 
suspects. What tied them all together was they all looked “Muslimy,” the term 
Wajahat Ali aptly used in Salon, and denotes how Muslims have become racialized 
in this country. There was also Steve Emerson, the faux terror “expert” 
welcomed by AIPAC with open arms, who opined about the “Saudi national” on 
television, as Ali Gharib documented.
And then there are the anti-Muslim hate crimes. ColorLines has chronicled some 
of them. They include: a white man punching a Palestinian woman 
who wears a hijab in Massachusetts; and Latino men beating up a 
Bangladeshi in the Bronx because he looked “Arab.”
But how easy anti-Muslim sentiment migrates over into the mainstream. Sure, 
this form of Islamophobia is not as blatant as Pam Geller’s. But 
it’s just as dangerous--if not more so, since more people imbibe what 
the mainstream tells them.
The mainstream media is busy speculating about whether Islam played a role in 
the decision to blow up the bombs at the Boston marathon. I 
heard one reporter ask the uncle of the suspects whether they were 
“radicalized” in a local mosque, apparently not knowing that the vast 
majority of mosques in the nationare nowhere near “radical.” This is the soft 
bigotry the mainstream is engaging in.
Another culprit that has bought into Islamophobia, and therefore 
legitimizing it, is law enforcement. Return back to the Saudi national 
story. As The New Yorker’s Amy Davidson writes, “he was the only one who, while 
in the hospital being treated for his 
wounds, had his apartment searched in ‘a startling show of force,’ as 
his fellow-tenants described it to the Boston Herald, with a 
‘phalanx’ of officers and agents and two K9 units.” Davidson goes on to 
ask: “Why the search, the interrogation, the dogs, the bomb squad, and 
the injured man’s name tweeted out, attached to the word ‘suspect’?” The 
question answers itself. He was Saudi. He was Arab. That’s enough for a lot of 
people, including law enforcement. It speaks volumes that the 
only injured person to have his home searched by law enforcement was the Saudi 
national.
Finally, let’s look at the man who runs the city that suffered the 
nation’s most catastrophic terrorist attack. Mayor Michael Bloomberg 
sought to reassure New York City in the aftermath of the Boston attacks. But he 
ended up exploiting the attacks for his own political purposes. 
At a press conference on Tuesday, he crassly said: “The moment that we let our 
guard down, the moment we get complacent, 
the moment we allow special interests to shape our security strategies, 
is the moment that the terrorists are waiting for. As a country, we may 
not be able to thwart every attack. We saw that yesterday. But we must 
do everything we possibly can to try.”
“Security strategies.” It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that Bloomberg is 
referring to the New York Police Department’s tactic of spying on Muslim 
communities with no regard as to whether people are innocent 
or guilty of any crime. Don’t get complacent: stop criticizing the NYPD, the 
mayor says. They’re doing their job, and their job is to map Muslim 
communities, eavesdrop on conversations and catalog innocent people in 
police documents related to terrorism. And those “special interests”? 
That’s a clear as day reference to the Muslims who are fighting back 
against the spy program and to the allies who have joined them in that 
fight.
What Bloomberg doesn’t acknowledge is that the police department 
itself has admitted in court that their surveillance program has not stopped a 
single act of terrorism. Not one. Which begs the question: how can the 
“security strategies” Bloomberg is defending help prevent the next Boston? They 
can’t. But Bloomberg wants to justify a program that is Islamophobic at its 
core.
So here we are, nearly 12 years after September 11 unleashed a new 
wave of anti-Muslim hate. 44 percent of Americans say they have an 
"unfavorable" view of Muslims, according to a recent poll--and that was before 
the Boston bombings. How little has changed.



http://mondoweiss.net/2013/04/marathon-bombings-islamophobia.html/comment-page-1#comment-557421

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to