Countdown to Nuclear Ruin at Paducah  
Neighbors for an Ohio Valley Alternative

By Geoffrey Sea
Disaster is about to strike in western Kentucky, a full-blown nuclear 
catastrophe involving hundreds of tons of enriched uranium tainted with 
plutonium, technetium, arsenic, beryllium and a toxic chemical brew. But this 
nuke calamity will be no fluke. It’s been foreseen, planned, even 
programmed, the result of an atomic extortion game played out between 
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the most failed American 
experiment in privatization, the company that has run the Paducah plant 
into the poisoned ground, USEC Inc.
As now scheduled, main power to the gargantuan gaseous diffusion 
uranium plant at Paducah, Kentucky, will be cut at midnight on May 31, 
just nine days from now—cut because USEC has terminated its power 
contract with TVA as of that time [“USEC Ceases Buying Power,”Paducah Sun, 
April 19, page 1] and because DOE can’t pick up the bill.
DOE is five months away from the start of 2014 spending authority, 
needed to fund clean power-down at Paducah. Meanwhile, USEC’s total 
market capitalization has declined to about $45 million, not enough to 
meet minimum listing requirements for the New York Stock Exchange, pay 
off the company’s staggering debts or retain its operating licenses 
under financial capacity requirements of the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission.
The Paducah plant cannot legally stay open, and it can’t safely be 
shut down—a lovely metaphor for the end of the Atomic Age and a perfect 
nightmare for the people of Kentucky.
Dirty Power-Down
If the main power to the diffusion cascade is cut as now may be 
unavoidable, the uranium hexafluoride gas inside thousands of miles of 
piping and process equipment will crystallize, creating a very costly 
gigantic hunk of junk as a bequest to future generations, delaying site 
cleanup for many decades and risking nuclear criticality problems that 
remain unstudied. Unlike gaseous uranium that can be flushed from pipes 
with relative ease, crystallized uranium may need to be chiseled out 
manually, adding greatly to occupational hazards.
The gaseous diffusion plant at Oak Ridge, TN, was powered-down dirty 
in 1985, in a safer situation because the Oak Ridge plant did not have 
near the level of transuranic contaminants found at Paducah. The Oak 
Ridge catastrophe left a poisonous site that still awaits cleanup a 
quarter-century later, and an echo chamber of political promises that 
such a stupid move would never be made again. But that was before the 
privatization of USEC.
Could a dirty power-down at Paducah—where recycled and reprocessed 
uranium contaminated with plutonium and other transuranic elements was 
added in massive quantities—result in “slow-cooker” critical mass 
formations inside the process equipment?
No one really knows.
Everybody does know that the Paducah plant is about to close. Its technology is 
Jurassic, requiring about ten times the energy of 
competing uranium enrichment methods around the world. The Paducah plant has 
been the largest single-meter consumer of electric power on the 
planet, requiring two TVA coal plants just to keep it operating, and 
it’s the largest single-source emitter of the very worst atmospheric 
gasses—chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).
The plant narrowly escaped the selection process that shuttered its 
sister plants in Tennessee and Ohio long ago. A 2012 apocalypse for 
Paducah workers was averted only by a last-second, five-party raid on 
the U.S. Treasury involving four federal entities pitching together to 
bail out USEC financially, a deal so arcane that knowledge of Mayan 
astrological codices would be required to grasp its basic principles. 
The plot would make for a great super-crime Hollywood movie in which 
Kentucky’s own George Clooney and Ashley Judd could star, if only the 
crafting lawyers and bureaucrats had made the Code of Federal 
Regulations as easy to decipher as bible code, or half as interesting.
“The deal” that saved Paducah operations for a year, past one crucial election 
non-coincidentally, probably consumed more net energy than it 
produced by stupidly paying USEC to run depleted uranium waste back 
through the inefficient Paducah plant—like a massive government program 
paying citizens to drink their own pee as a way to cut sewerage costs 
and keep medics employed prior to a Presidential contest. The deal never would 
have passed muster if it had been subjected to environmental or 
economic reviews of any kind, but it wasn’t. The “jobs” mantra was 
chanted, and all applicable laws from local noise-control ordinances to 
the Geneva Conventions were waived.
But the deal expires on May 31, in nine days. USEC and DOE have both 
said that discussions for a new extension deal continue, but rumors of a new 
deal were dashed on May 7, sending USEC stock into a flip-flop, 
when in an investor conference call, the company announced that no extension 
had been agreed, with very 
pessimistic notes about even a “short-term” postponement. That 
accompanied news that USEC had suffered a $2 million loss in the first 
quarter of 2013, largely attributable to the power bill at Paducah, 
which USEC says it’s under no obligation to keep paying.
Showing no enthusiasm whatsoever, USEC CEO John Welch said on May 7:
“While we continue to pursue options for a short-term extension of enrichment 
at Paducah beyond May 31, we also 
continue to prepare to cease enrichment in early June.”
Meanwhile, the Kentucky DOE field office in charge, managed by 
William A. Murphie, has advertised a host of companies “expressing 
interest” in future use of the Paducah site, with no explanation of how 
the existing edifice of egregiousness will be made to disappear. “Off 
the record,” the Kentucky field office has floated dates like 2060 for 
the completion of Paducah cleanup.
That’s two generations from now and kind of a long time for the 
skilled workforce and other interested parties to hang around. Even the 
2060 date assumes that costs can be minimized by evacuating the 
diffusion cells before power-down—the scenario that seems certain not to happen 
because no one has the funding for it. Flushing the cells of 
uranium hexafluoride gas is the only sensible way to power-down, but 
it’s costly and time-consuming. At the Piketon, Ohio, plant a semi-clean 
power-down has cost billions of dollars and has taken twelve years and 
counting to accomplish. (Murphie will have to explain why he paid USEC 
so much money for the extended power-down at Piketon, while 
simultaneously asserting that a Paducah power-down can be accomplished 
swiftly and cheaply). Clean power-down also requires that workers and 
supplies be available on demand, and in the Paducah case, there simply 
isn’t time.
According to reliable sources, contracts are being prepared for the 
work of placing the plant into what Murphie calls “cold storage”—a term 
of his invention. But those contracts won’t take effect until October 
when fiscal 2014 funds are available. “Cold storage” at that point means 
closing the doors, posting guards outside, and otherwise walking away.
Can there yet be an extension deal to hold over the plant until 2014 
funds are available? Probably not, because USEC may not last that long, 
the equipment in the plant has been run to decrepitude with no attention to 
maintenance, there isn’t sufficient time to make the arrangements, 
and a second end-run around environmental compliance would likely 
generate lawsuits.
Captains Log: A Heck of a Long Time
As to when the site might be cleaned up for “future use” under a 
“cold storage” scenario, nothing has even been rumored. I think we are 
talking Star Trek dates. Or consider the half-life of natural uranium, 
which is about four and a half billion years.
Until such time, the Paducah plant will either sit like a massive 
metallic boil on the planet, or be demolished and scavenged for 
semi-precious metals like the Oak Ridge facility. But the plutonium, 
americium and neptunium at Paducah may nix the latter possibility. The 
dirty power-down arranged by Murphie would make it impossible to prevent 
transuranic atmospheric release during demolition.
I propose a bronze encasement for the whole fandango, with a plaque that reads:
                                                    WRECK OF THE U.S. USEC
GREATEST FAILURE OF GOVERNMENT PRIVATIZATION IN WORLD HISTORY
                                                             IN MEMORIUM
At least that would help Murphie comply with the National Historic Preservation 
Act. Call it a learning experience.
Interested observers are still awaiting some rabbit to be pulled from Murphie’s 
hat, as he produced one year ago in 2012. To gauge that 
possibility I sent Murphie an e-mail on May 10, asking him where he was 
going to get the money to pay for clean power-down with the cut-off date only 
weeks away as reported by USEC. Specifically, I wrote: “What’s up 
with that?”
And, within hours I received a reply, probably because I had copied 
Mitch McConnel’s chief of staff on my correspondence. Murphie wrote:
“As you are likely aware, the Paducah 
procurement process has begun involving the USEC facilities. I suggest 
you look at the DOE CBC home page regarding the proposed IDIQ business 
opportunities and keep an eye on it for updates. As for the funding 
question, the DOE did submit a request to Congress that includes 
language regarding the potential USEC facilities return [a fiscal year 
2014 request].”
That’s a very interesting reply because, aside from the vacuous PR 
about fantastic “business opportunities” at a site of nuclear 
catastrophe (maybe a lollipop factory!), it confirms that DOE does not 
have some secret stash of funds to evacuate the diffusion cells at 
Paducah, at least until fiscal year 2014, at least five months too late. 
Murphie is still calling the certain closure of the Paducah monstrosity 
“potential,” meaning he can’t yet pay for it. I asked Murphie to resolve that 
dilemma in a follow-up e-mail, but alas I had used up my 
entitlement to one response per five years and so got none.
I admit that some pretty cool proposals for Paducah “future use” have been 
cooked up by Murphie and his PR people. In mid-2012, Kentucky 
state legislators sought an exemption from the state’s moratorium on 
nuclear power (a giveaway to coal interests), so that Paducah could 
become a research center exploring the use of nuclear explosives in fracking 
for oil and gas. Hot diggity!
“Discussions” between DOE and USEC about extension may indeed be 
ongoing. But I imagine they are like the proverbial separation 
negotiations between the gold-miner and the gold-digger. The gold-digger 
demands maintenance for the lifestyle to which she’s become accustomed, or 
she’ll walk. The gold-miner looks at the lump of iron pyrite he’s 
been left with and says: “You already got everything I had.”
DOE’s William Muphie and Daniel Poneman (second and third from left) with 
USEC employees at the Piketon site. Photo credit: U.S. Department of 
Energy
Murphie’s Law
So how did it come to this? Since the plant was originally scheduled 
to cease operations on May 31, 2012, why didn’t USEC and DOE have plenty of 
time to plan for orderly and funded clean power-down, which was 
precisely what the sleazy one-year extension deal was supposed to give 
time to accomplish.
The answer is that the entire uranium enrichment enterprise of the 
U.S. has become a sham operation, a sham designed to funnel U.S. 
Treasury funds to private companies including USEC and its partners, a 
sham designed to convert any problem or scandal into additional 
contractor award fees, a sham designed to keep the fig-leaf of a 
privatized USEC Inc. from blowing away and exposing all the naughty 
bits.
Those became the goals of the operation, not enriching uranium, 
developing new technology or achieving safe operations or cleanup of the sites. 
Murphie’s Law is that if anything can go wrong, it will boost 
contractor award fees, for a select group of companies hand-picked by 
Murphie himself. Thus, the principal “cleanup” contractors at Piketon 
are Fluor and Babcock & Wilcox (B&W), both of which are 
suppliers to USEC’s fake “American Centrifuge Project,” and B&W is a strategic 
partner of USEC with a large share of USEC preferred stock, 
poised to take over USEC’s operations if the latter goes under.
And USEC is going under, by design, leaving its bondholders, 
pensioners and U.S. taxpayers holding one very empty bag. USEC stock has now 
lost 99% of value since its bubble peak in 2007. USEC’s auditors 
issued a “going concern” letter in March of this year, warning that the 
company appears to have no viable business plan moving forward. The New 
York Stock Exchange issued a delisting warning to USEC in May of 2012, 
and a second warning on a separate deficiency in May of 2013.
If USEC is delisted, about half a billion dollars of debt to 
bondholders becomes due immediately, and at least $100 million in 
pension obligations are owed in Ohio and Kentucky each. But the entire 
company is only worth about a twentieth of its debts, or about 1 percent of the 
cost of the new commercial plant it pretends it will build. 
USEC’s 2013 shareholders meeting, at which the crisis might come to a 
precipitous conclusion, was postponed from April to June, presumably to 
give the company a chance to depart from Paducah without adding a 
nuclear crisis to its public liabilities. USEC is now an empty shell 
about to be shucked: the company’s dissolution and the Paducah plant’s 
decommissioning have been timed to coincide.
Once USEC has departed Paducah, it will no longer be in the uranium 
enrichment business, as it will operate no enrichment facilities. The 
company, which was created by statute for the sole purposes of enriching 
uranium and developing new technology, will be doing neither. It will 
only be an international uranium broker, ironically a front for Russian 
uranium interests. Imagine if the U.S. Postal Service decided to hoard 
its U.S. government subsidies, exit the mail delivery business and 
become only a marketing agent for Russian stamps. That analogy precisely 
applies to what USEC is doing, in stark violation of the USEC 
Privatization Act.
But USEC has had two quite powerful politicians in its service, from 
the states in which it has operated, men who control the Republican 
caucuses in both chambers of Congress—John Boehner of southern Ohio and 
Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. If Congress had appropriated the funds to 
pay for Paducah power-down in a timely fashion, for fiscal year 2013, 
then the USEC house of cards would have come down one year earlier. 
There could not have been rumors of federally-financed extension deals, 
or stock speculation runs premised on talk of a USEC buyout, or 
shipments of “spare parts” from Piketon to Paducah just to make it look 
like USEC is a going concern.
In short, if Bill Muphie’s office had secured the funds and let the 
contracts to do a clean power-down of Paducah starting June 1, then the 
jig would have been up for USEC months ago, the company might already be in 
liquidation, and hundreds of millions of dollars in continuing 
federal subsidies to USEC might not have been wasted. For its part, USEC has 
even now failed to announce a date certain for Paducah closure, 
although cancellation of its power contract was an effective extortion 
tactic for wheedling additional dollars from federal coffers.
So Murphie didn’t secure the funds and didn’t issue the contracts, 
and kept right on doing federally-paid PR work to falsely suggest there 
could be a smooth economic conversion at Paducah. Boehner and McConnell 
ate it all up while chanting the “jobs” mantra, for it reinforced their 
narrative that USEC Inc. is the best thing since sliced atoms. To keep a large 
campaign contributor out of bankruptcy court for a few more 
months, the Paducah plant was permitted to reach the current crisis 
state. And the people of Kentucky were sent straight to nuclear hell.
Nine days.

http://ecowatch.com/2013/countdown-to-nuclear-ruin-at-paducah/

NOTE:  It only takes 6 kg of Pu 239 to make a Hiroshima sized bomb. 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to