http://www.marxist.com/the-woolwich-atrocity.htm

The Woolwich atrocity <http://www.marxist.com/the-woolwich-atrocity.htm>
Written by Alan WoodsMonday, 27 May 2013
[image: Print] <http://www.marxist.com/the-woolwich-atrocity/print.htm>[image:
E-mail]<http://www.marxist.com/component/option,com_mailto/link,a26db342922109543ff456c6af3ae765dbfb5d82/tmpl,component/>

   -
   -
   -

Public opinion in Britain and throughout the world was horrified by the
murder of a soldier on the streets of Woolwich in South London. The
gruesome images of a young man with bloodied hands, brandishing a kitchen
knife and haranguing passers-by shook the entire nation to its foundations.

[image: 
lee-rigby]<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/britain/woolwich-killing.jpg>Drummer
Lee RigbyDrummer Lee Rigby was first knocked down by a car and then dragged
into the middle of the road and hacked to death with knives and a meat
cleaver. More than an assassination, it was like an act of butchery. One
witness said: they hacked at him like a piece of meat.” This took place in
broad daylight, in the presence of ordinary people going about their daily
business.

The assailants, Michael Adebolajo, 28, and Michael Adebowale, 22, were shot
and wounded by police at the scene in Woolwich on Wednesday after the
killing. What was most surprising was that the attackers made no attempt to
flee from the scene of the crime. They had plenty of time to do so, since
the police response was pitifully slow. They could have easily escaped even
on public transport, but they made no attempt to do so. On the contrary,
they hung around, haranguing passers-by, whom they even asked to film them.
Nobody else was attacked.

[image: 
woolwich-killing]<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/britain/woolwich-killing.jpg>This
is like the old idea of “propaganda of the deed.” They were making a
statement – albeit a sickeningly bloody one. Probably, they expected to be
shot dead by the police, thus becoming martyrs of the Jihad. But even this
pathetic plan backfired. When the police marksmen finally appeared, the two
would-be martyrs staged a suicidal charge and were duly shot down. But they
survived and will live long enough to tell the tale.

The soldier they killed, Drummer Lee Rigby, was a 25-year old working class
youngster from Manchester with a two-year-old son. He was due to see his
family on leave that weekend. Instead, his distraught wife, parents and
children were paraded before the television, where their raw expressions of
grief further increased the public sense of revulsion.

The two men shot by police in Woolwich remain under heavy guard in
hospital. Scotland Yard said they had also arrested a man and woman, both
aged 29 on conspiracy to murder. But these have since been released on
bail. This detail suggests that there could have been no firm evidence
against them, which confirms the impression that Adebolajo and Adebowale
had acted alone.
Was it an al Qaeda attack?

As soon as news of this atrocity was made public, the media began to
speculate on al Qaeda involvement, although they also expressed concern
about “home grown terrorism”. Attention was drawn to the fact that one of
the killers clearly spoke with a south London accent. It subsequently
emerged that both men were British but of Nigerian extraction. This news
has caused a sensation in Nigeria, where many people were at pains to
disassociate their country from this act.

The use of the phrase al Qaeda in connection with each and every terrorist
act gives the impression of a remarkably well-organized Islamic world
conspiracy, something that puts the old-fashioned Judeo-Communist-Masonic
conspiracy quite in the shade.

After the end of the cold war the imperialists needed to find a new
“external threat” for their propaganda and Islamic Fundamentalists fitted
that profile quite well. In reality though, al Qaeda does not exist as the
major operation it is portrayed as in the media. It is a convenient
catch-all phrase that is intended to explain a whole series of explosive
outbreaks in different parts of the world that are a convulsive reflection
of deep social contradictions. It is an explanation that explains nothing.

There is in fact a growing Jihadi insurgency in the North of Nigeria, where
the army is locked in a deadly war with the Islamic Movement Boko Haram.
This bloody war is a reflection of deep-seated economic, social and
political problems in Nigeria. It does not need to be explained by any
external and foreign conspiracies. In any case, nobody has yet attempted to
establish any connection between the perpetrators of the Woolwich atrocity
and Nigeria, other than an accident of birth. But the image of a black man
waving a knife with bloody hands on the streets of London is a most welcome
sight for racists who wish to spread hatred against all non-white citizens
of the UK.

If there was some kind of link with foreign Jihadis, it was not with
Nigeria but with Somalia. It has emerged that both were already known to
the security services. It seems that Michael Adebolajo was arrested in
Kenya for attempting to cross the border into Somalia to join the
Al-Shabaab Jihadi rebels. He claimed to have been tortured by the Kenyan
police before they handed him over to British intelligence agents. The
Foreign Office has confirmed that Michael Adebolajo was arrested in Kenya
in 2010.

[image: michael-adebolajo]Michael AdebolajoAccording to a friend of Michael
Adebolajo, the security services had tried to recruit him. Abu Nusaybah
told BBC Newsnight that Adebolajo had informed him six months ago that the
security service had been “knocking on his door”. He said Adebolajo had
told him he had turned down an offer to work for them. Mr Nusaybah said
that his friend was “basically being harassed by MI5”. In the interview he
said: “His wording was, 'They are bugging me - they won't leave me alone.'

”He mentioned initially they wanted to ask him if he knew certain
individuals. But after him saying that he didn't know these individuals,
what he said was they asked him if he would be interested in working for
them. He was explicit in that he refused to work for them but he did
confirm he didn't know the individuals.” It is interesting that shortly
after the TV programme, Abu Nusaybah was himself arrested. Was the reason
that MI5 did not move against Adebolajo that they were trying to recruit
him? If so, the manoeuvre backfired badly.

The crude nature of the attack and the primitive character of the weapons
used (kitchen knives, a meat clever) do not point to the kind of
sophisticated operation for which professional Jihadi outfits possess the
necessary skills. Rather it would seem to indicate an improvised assault
staged by desperate young fanatics, motivated by a deep sense of social
alienation and fired up by Jihadi demagogy on the Internet.
What was behind the murder?

What was the intention of those who perpetrated this barbaric act? Was it
to arouse the sympathy of the British public for the sufferings of the
people of Iraq and Afghanistan, for whom this kind of murder and mayhem are
nothing unusual but rather their daily bread? This point was made explicit
by one of the assassins in a clip filmed by a passer-by. If that was the
intention, it has misfired badly.

One of the main reasons for the radicalisation of Muslim youth has
undoubtedly been the brutal imperialist interventions in places like Iraq
and Afghanistan, which has led to the deaths of many thousands of innocent
men, women and children over the past decade. This seems to have been the
message that these men wished to convey to the people of Britain. But in
that case, they have achieved precisely the opposite result to that
intended.

The effect of the Woolwich atrocity has been to provoke a wave of support
for the British army and the boys in Afghanistan, who are seen as combating
barbarous forces that are intent on killing us all. Far from driving a
wedge between the British public and the armed forces, it has had quite the
opposite effect.

Maybe it was to gain support for the jihadis among the Muslim population,
to show that Islam is capable of “fighting back against the ‘Crusaders’.
But the effect of this atrocity has been to provoke wave of revulsion and
fear among ordinary Muslims, who are not in favour of terrorist attacks,
and still less in favour of butchery. Even more than before Muslims must
now live in fear of being seen by suspicion by their non-Muslim neighbours,
of having their homes and mosques attacked by racist thugs, of being
regarded as “the enemy within.”
Only reaction benefits

[image: EDL]The people who stand to gain most from this kind of action are
the racists and the fascist thugs of the so-called English Defence League.
They have already attempted to stage some provocative demonstrations and
rallies aimed against “Islamic extremism”, but in fact directed against all
Muslims and immigrants generally. There has been a sharp increase of verbal
and physical attacks on ordinary Muslims up and down the country since the
murder of Drummer Lee Rigby.

Faith Matters, an organisation that works to reduce extremism, said it had
been told of about 150 incidents in the last few days, compared to between
four to eight cases before Wednesday. Fiyaz Mughal, the director of Faith
Matters, said incidents were happening on the streets and online. "What's
really concerning is the spread of these incidents. They're coming in from
right across the country," he told the BBC. "Secondly, some of them are
quite aggressive; very focused, very aggressive attacks. And thirdly, there
also seems to be significant online activity … suggesting co-ordination of
incidents and attacks against institutions or places where Muslims
congregate."

The Woolwich murder is also being used to stir up British public opinion to
support the introduction of tougher laws against “incitement to terrorism”.
 A poll published in *the Mail on Sunday* found 64% believe “more needs to
be done to prevent vulnerable people becoming radicalised”. Sixty-three per
cent now believe the death penalty should be reintroduced for terrorists.
Not only will the rights of terrorists be curtailed but also those of trade
unionists and members of the Labour Movement.

This was a propaganda gift of incalculable proportions to the very people
and institutions’ the terrorists claim to be fighting against. It serves to
strengthen imperialism and the state, providing a highly convenient excuse
for the introduction of new repressive legislation, which in the future can
be used against the working class.

This fact was immediately made clear by the indecent haste with which the
Tories rushed to propose the introduction of anti-democratic legislation.
Tory Home Secretary Theresa May has claimed that “thousands of people are
potentially at risk of being radicalised” in the UK. She told BBC One's
Andrew Marr Show that those at risk were at "different points on what could
be a path to violent extremism". Mrs May said a new taskforce would look at
whether new powers were needed to tackle radicalisation. This is a very
dangerous development for the Labour Movement.
How could it happen?

It was only to be expected that the circumstances of the Woolwich murder
would produce a reaction of revulsion and fury. “They are just animals!”
That would be the most common reaction. But despite the monstrous nature of
the crime, such a reaction does not fit the facts. Having butchered their
victim, the two men did not attack any other person. It would have been
very easy to kill and wound a large number of people in the street, but
they made no attempt to do so. Instead, they attempted to talk to the
shocked witnesses and persuade them of the justice of their cause.

The footage shown on the internet showed a man, speaking to the camera,
saying:

"We must fight them as they fight us. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a
tooth." He added: "I apologise that women have had to witness this today,
but in our land our women have to see the same. You people will never be
safe. Remove your government, they don't care about you."

It goes without saying that nobody accepted that such a horrific crime
could be justified by any argument whatsoever. But the question that must
be asked is: what turns an ordinary young man into a fanatical killer? Why
is it that thousands of young people may be attracted to go down this path?
Numerous people who knew the family have stated that previously Michael
Adebolajo had been a normal youngster, intelligent, kind and humane, but
that something had happened to change him.

What was that something? Some point to his conversion to Islam. But many
thousands of people convert to Islam without becoming terrorists and
murderers. The reason for this transformation must be looked for, not in
the pages of the Quran, but in the social conditions of young people in
Britain today.

The television news showed the police breaking into a block of old council
flats in Woolwich. This type of estate has become a kind of dumping ground
for the unfortunate rejects of capitalist society. Nowadays one is lucky
even to get that sort of accommodation. There is an acute shortage of
housing, especially in London where people cannot afford the high rents.
The withdrawal of rent subsidies has forced many poor families to leave
their homes and even leave London altogether. Even the Tory Mayor of
London, Boris Johnson has described this as “Kosovo-style social cleansing
of the poor from London.”

Despite the poverty and bad conditions, many poor families struggle to
create a decent living environment, above all to allow their children to
“get on”, to go to school, to get out of the abyss of social deprivation.
But the dice are always loaded against them. At least one of those
responsible for the murder had been to university. But in the present
crisis of capitalism, even a university degree is no guarantee of a future.
The presence of a large and growing number of unemployed university
graduates will provide a vast reserve for the recruitment to terrorist
groups of one kind or another, unless the Labour Movement takes the
necessary steps to win them over.

In this poisonous milieu, feelings of resentment and alienation can be
expressed in all kinds of anti-social behaviour: senseless violence, gangs,
drug addiction, and all the other evils that are constantly being spawned
by an unjust and inhuman society. If the Labour Movement were true to its
traditions, it would organize these young people and provide them with a
cause worth fighting for in the transformation of society. But the leaders
of Labour have nothing to offer the youth. On the contrary, they seem to be
no different to the bourgeois politicians who sit opposite them in the
House of Commons.

Looking for a possible solution to their problems, a small layer embraces
radical Islam. The demagogy of the Jihadis gives a twisted expression to
their sense of injustice and desire to fight the existing system. In place
of a class consciousness, they imbibe a sense of religious “otherness” that
at once gives them a welcome sense of identity and the conviction of the
need to fight a common enemy. Taken to an extreme, this can give rise to
the kind of murderous manifestation that was seen on the streets of
Woolwich last week.
Fight racism! Fight capitalism!

The liberals and reformists call for “inter-community solidarity”, but such
empty slogans will be powerless to combat the racist poison of groups like
the English Defence League. As long as our society is racked by the cancer
of unemployment, poverty and homelessness, there is no way that the poison
of racism can be expunged.

The only answer of the ruling class is to step up state repression. May and
Cameron are using the aftermath of this brutal murder to impose suffocating
free speech bans, allegedly directed against extremist clerics. Let us be
clear. This legislation is not directed against terrorism or acts of
violence. It can and will be used against free speech, to prevent anybody
from expressing, not just extreme Islamic views but any views that are
inimical to the Establishment.

They are considering banning certain people from speaking in schools,
colleges, prisons, mosques and other public areas. They are also seeking a
lower threshold for banning extremist organisations outright. But Lib Dem
deputy leader Simon Hughes has pointed out that there is "no evidence at
all that the bill could have prevented the killing in Woolwich”. The
working class cannot put such a dangerous weapon into the hands of the
ruling class. Such moves to curtail freedom of speech must be resisted by
all means.

There is an atmosphere of fear in the Muslim community, which feels anxious
and vulnerable. The Labour Movement must be mobilised to defend Muslims
against fascist and racist attacks. Pious speeches calling for “unity” are
not enough. The Labour Movement must prove in action that it is prepared to
defend a minority that is threatened by racist thugs. Let us revive the
fighting spirit of the 1930s that culminated in the Battle of cable Street!
Let us sweep the fascist rabble from the streets! That will be the best way
to cut the ground from under the feet of the Jihadi demagogues and win over
the Muslim population to the side of labour.

Deprivation and social alienation feed upon each other in an endless
downward spiral. Many of the victims are young blacks, Asians and people
from the Middle East, for whom the general problems of poverty,
unemployment and the lack of opportunities is compounded by racism and
police harassment. It is capitalism that breeds the kind of barbarism we
saw last week. Only the overthrow of a rotten system will put an end to the
nightmare and create the material conditions for a genuinely human society
based on solidarity and brotherhood, not division and hate.

London 27 May


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to