Festive Left Friday Blogging: Venezuela comes to
Venice<http://www.sabinabecker.com/2013/05/festive-left-friday-blogging-venezuela-comes-to-venice.html>May
31, 2013 — Sabina Becker

[image: bolivar-mural]

Coolest mural at the Biennale? Bolívar in shades, bitchez.



   1. Hands Off Venezuela @HOVcampaign <https://twitter.com/HOVcampaign>

   Colombia researchers and journalist flee the country as assassination
   plot against them is uncovered http://elpais.com/elpais/2013/05
   /15/inenglish/1368631163_512123.html … <http://t.co/hr0wchckIi>
   Show Summary<https://twitter.com/HOVcampaign/statuses/340835813879320580>
      - Reply<https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?in_reply_to=340835813879320580>
      - Retweet<https://twitter.com/intent/retweet?tweet_id=340835813879320580>
      - 
Favorite<https://twitter.com/intent/favorite?tweet_id=340835813879320580>
   2. 6h <https://twitter.com/HOVcampaign/statuses/340753559555559426>
   Hands Off Venezuela @HOVcampaign <https://twitter.com/HOVcampaign>

   Local council elections called for December 8


After Chavez: Grassroots Fight on Despite Opposition’s War of Attrition

May 31st 2013, by Tamara Pearson - Venezuelanalysis.com
[image: A mural in Merida characterising Henrique Capriles as a chameleon
(Tamara Pearson/ Venezuelanalysis.com)]

A mural in Merida characterising Henrique Capriles as a chameleon (Tamara
Pearson/ Venezuelanalysis.com)

Clown doctors dancing with elderly women for a communal council event,
debates about Venezuela’s political culture organised by the PSUV
(Socialist Party) youth, the kids reading books at the annual book festival
held in the basement of the cultural centre, a week of vaccinations through
the Barrio Adentro health centres, a short queue for the free cable car,
another communal council meeting with the governor to discuss a tourism
socio-productive project, rumours that Maduro will visit Merida, but he
doesn’t, a parade of kids in historical costumes to mark 200 years
since *campana
admirable*... three months after the heart wrenching collective sadness
following Chavez’s death, life seems to be going back to normal here. The
happy revolution continues. Yet the fact that things are largely the same
as before Chavez died is both a huge achievement and statement about the
maturity of this revolution, and also a concern.

*The opposition’s war of attrition*

We are in a qualitatively different period right now. Chavez has died,
Nicolas Maduro is president, and the rightwing is making a real effort to
take power. For the first time in 14 years they feel that, without Chavez,
they have a chance, and have gone on the offensive. Opposition leaders
began their strategy while Chavez was still sick in hospital. It consists
of discrediting the government through media conferences and stunts like
the national assembly fight, the ‘hunger strikes’ over Chavez being treated
in Cuba, going to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Venezuela’s
Supreme Court, with full coverage by the national and international
corporate media. The opposition leaders have created a cause, a movement of
sorts, which opposes the “undemocratic” Venezuelan government, and we can
see that opposition supporters are now more willing to mobilise than
before. A very large proportion of them participated in the *cacerolazos *(pot
banging) when Capriles refused to recognise Maduro’s win on 14 April. On
May Day, though the opposition march was smaller than the Chavista one, it
was much bigger than the few hundred people the opposition has mobilised on
that day in the past. Previously, opposition supporters were quieter-
they’d mutter their criticisms or complaints to friends, but not much more.
Now they walk the street in their Capriles caps and t-shirts somewhat
proudly, and with confidence.

However, while the opposition has become a little stronger, they expected
things to really fall apart without Chavez, and that hasn’t happened
either. Their strategy is consistent, persistent, yet somewhat desperate.
They are also trying to wear down the Chavista movement morally, through
their media war, and economically, by propelling inflation (while the
government’s fixed exchange rate doesn’t quite reflect the real value of
the Bolivar, neither does the parallel rate which has gone up from 10:1 to
28:1 in just 6 months) and contributing to food hoarding. (I say
‘contributing’ because the food scarcity issue is complex, it has to do
with production and distribution issues, the exchange rate, but also the
real coincidence that most products became scarce right after Chavez’s
death and when elections were called, not after the devaluing of the
Bolivar in February).

Though we’re used to shortages now- as they do tend to coincide with the
numerous elections held here, it has been just a bit harder this time
round, though I’d argue more on a psychological level of not feeling
confident of what products will be available, than on an actual, practical
food level. Despite what the mainstream media says, that there is a
“crisis” in Venezuela, the truth is no one is hungry or anything close to
it, we just have to improvise a bit and have pasta for dinner instead of
arepas (corn patties) sometimes.

However, this time the opposition’s strategy isn’t a short term, two month
type one. It’s a long term, three year long one, which aims to win a recall
referendum of President Maduro. It’s a war of attrition that seeks to
demoralise, disorientate, plant doubts, divide, and demobilise the Chavista
movement gradually.

Capriles the media showman, and the opposition’s terribly fabricated
“evidence” of fraud etc (check out their kindergarten project style
document<http://ep00.epimg.net/descargables/2013/04/22/d90518eb6c110ddf054451f714785ad3.pdf>
made
after the election, or perhaps before) – awkward, and unintelligent. Their
latest stunt though, the “recording” of Silva, was a bit more craftily
done- perhaps because they are learning or received help, or perhaps
because it was real- it doesn’t really matter. All Chavistas know already
that there is corruption within the government and its institutions, though
they might disagree on the extent, or the particular names. Further, the
opposition didn’t release the recording because they had some kind of
charitable aim of helping us clean out the government, but for their own
purposes. Capriles, in his showman style, announced that something “big”
would be coming out days before the recording was released, and low and
behold the recording fulfilled all the opposition’s wildest dreams; backing
up their ridiculous argument that Cuba “controls” Venezuela’s decisions,
that there are divisions in the government, that the new national police-
a serious government attempt to deal with the crime situation – is
controlled by Cabello, all said by a well respected Chavista figure- Mario
Silva.

And while the release of the recording probably did its little bit of
damage, to add to the accumulated damage done recently and over the next
three years, as a strategy it also underestimates most Chavistas. Because
we are already regularly, openly, publically, and happily criticising the
government when necessary, and self criticising the revolution.

*Trapped in a binary*

What the opposition offensive means however, is that politics in Venezuela
has become even more trapped in an opposition v government binary, *with
the grassroots sidelined, in some respects, and less time for the more
important revolutionary tasks.*

With the opposition attacks,* the PSUV especially has focused on “loyalty”
to the government*. Its energy has gone into constant counter-accusations
against the opposition, rather than into radicalising and deepening the
revolution. It feels like we are still in an election campaign, with the
government also focused on getting things done- public works and so on – a
good thing of course, but a revolution is about more than that. And with
everyone clear that the opposition will seek a recall, Capriles even
announcing it earlier this month, it is in fact looking a bit like 3 years
of that sort of electoral oriented dynamic.

We should be marching, yet the opposition has managed to move politics more
into the media war and further away from the streets. While before, say
around 2006, having an active opposition meant that we were kept on our
toes – didn’t become complacent, now it means that our energy is often
taken away from what we should be doing, and put into arguing with their
latest stunt, which the corporate media of course de-contextualises,
manipulates, sensationalises, and uses to create fear.

Interestingly though, post 14 April, the government has also shown some
real signs that it cares about, *and/or is feeling the pressure of the
grassroots*. I was surprised when a meeting called by the National
Anti-drug Organisation (ONA) in Merida with fire-fighters, police, communal
council representatives and others (around 150 people attended in total) to
apply the “movement for peace” program in Merida, actually broke up into
working groups so that we, the spokespeople and workers, could make
concrete proposals. It’s quite a change to our usual dealings with the ONA,
where typically 80 communal councils will submit full project proposals
(months of work) and compete for funding which the ONA will ultimately
award to perhaps 5 of them.

Then there’s this new ‘street government’, where Maduro and his ministers
spend around 4 days in each state, talking with various communities and
productive sectors. When they come to Merida, VA will no doubt write up
something specifically on this initiative, but for now, the organised
grassroots’ high expectations are notable. Here, people are already putting
together proposals, with the aim of getting more financing. One
report<http://www.aporrea.org/regionales/a167035.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook>
though
from the street government in Guayana indicated that Maduro and the
government were badly informed about various facts of the worker situation
there, and the government announced funding for public works which had
already actually been allocated and provided. The works, while desired by
the communities, weren’t actually discussed or approved by them.

*Mixed reaction by the grassroots*

So with this offensive by the opposition, something more than just
‘business as usual’ is required of the bases. But first, it’s important to
stress the big deal it is that the revolution went on after Chavez – a feat
utterly ignored by the corporate media.

That we are still organising, debating, painting murals, writing, planting,
and working as hard as before shows that a proportion of the population is
consciousness enough to fight even without Chavez’s rallying speeches and
initiatives. The political stamina- marching and fighting after 16
elections and despite all the problems and attacks, is inspiring. The
revolution has developed to a point where politics is a basic part of life
– something that is uncommon in other countries, and that explains the deep
love and connection people also felt for Chavez. People outside Venezuela,
especially the press, naively and condescendingly dismissed that connection
as “cultism”, but things have reached a point here where basically everyone
is glued to the news more than the strongest sports fanatics are glued to
their games. People of both sides debate politics like it has everything to
do with them, because of course it does, and that will not change soon.

Even some problems can be positive, if we organise well. The shortages of
toothpaste and toilet paper for example, have seen some sectors of Chavismo
discussing how dependent capitalism has made us on consuming products we
don’t actually need, or are capable of producing ourselves, at home, or
collectively in communities. In one of my communities, we’ve held
toothpaste and yoghurt making workshops, for example. Food is actually a
great organising tool. Unfortunately though, such a response is by a small
minority; the government has dealt with the situation by importing tonnes
of toilet paper, and many Chavistas would still describe the situation as
“serious”, even though they actually have certain products, or are managing
fine without them.

And, as we say here, we’ve “fallen into routine”. There are a few
initiatives, but they aren’t enough to respond to the new situation, and to
the threat to the revolution that is certain in three years, if not before.
Here in Merida both the youth of the Communist party and of the PSUV are
organising weekly ideology workshops now, and some of the key political
groups, such as the PSUV, PCV, Tupamaros, and the Frente Francisco de
Miranda, have taken steps towards forming an “anti-imperialist front”, to
basically defend the government and the revolution from internal and
external attacks (be they economic, media based, etc). People are more
polarised, and both sides are less passive and polite when it comes to
disagreeing in arguments in the street, the media, and over social media.

However, to deepen and protect the revolution, the activist bases and
activist, revolutionary leadership need to be less disarticulated and start
taking on more of a proactive role. But the government is seen to be, and
is for now, the leadership – logical in a way, and in terms of many
individual members of the government, often deserved. However, it is the
grassroots organising- as workers, community, students, consumers, in cadre
parties etc, that is the antidote to all the bureaucracy, corruption, and
inefficiency. And everyone here knows that if those things aren’t truly
smashed over the next three years, it will be hard to deepen the
revolution, and we will definitely lose the recall.

I also think that some Chavistas are a bit confused, disoriented, and have
an idea of what needs to be done, but not how to kick it off (myself
included). Others have even changed sides. One friend, who has to be
anonymous, was one of the founders of the Tupamaros (a pro-government
Marxist organisation), and of a radical student movement. He now supports
Capriles; he believes the recording released by the opposition is real, and
he doesn’t want to keep supporting Chavismo, arguing that when the
grassroots organise, all they are doing is supporting opportunists in
government. He saw the *cacerolazo* in his community and feels it has gone
to the opposition, and that things are largely hopeless. Unfortunately, for
some Chavistas, it’s conceivable to see Capriles as someone who can fix all
the problems, rather than as the super-rich man who participated in a coup
against Chavez. Other Chavistas are staying “loyal”, others constructively
critical, and others are doubting.  Most supporters though are clear that
opportunism and corruption are obstacles to fight, rather than
representative of what the Bolivarian revolution actually is.

This *coyuntara*, this situation, is something we had to go through sooner
or later, and is part of the long term change process. It is worrying, to
be honest, but as a chance to grow- politically and collectively, it’s a
welcome challenge.
------------------------------
*Source URL (retrieved on 31/05/2013 - 10:27pm):*
http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/9634


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to