http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2013/06/fbi-director-candidate-comey-complicit-dark-chapter-us-history

FBI Director Candidate Comey Complicit in “Dark Chapter” in US History
Posted by Bill Conroy <http://narcosphere.narconews.com/users/bill-conroy> -
June 1, 2013 at 4:29 pm

*Former Deputy Attorney General Played Leading Role in Cover-Up of US
Government Informant’s Participation in Mass Murder in Mexico*

President Barack Obama is expected to nominate former George W. Bush-era
Deputy Attorney General James Comey as the next director of the FBI,
according to multiple media outlets that have published fawning reports
about Comey’s supposed independence and upstanding moral character.

Comey, according to those
reports<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/05/30/comey-fbi-director-confirmation-gop-democrat-divide/2373505/>,
is deemed the ideal pick because he is a Republican who also is admired by
Democrats for his principled stand against the Bush Administration’s
warrantless surveillance program — a still highly-classified program
Comey ultimately
acquiesced<http://www.seattlepi.com/national/article/NSA-program-led-to-standoff-at-Ashcroft-s-sickbed-1237491.php>
to
after some unspecified technical changes were adopted by the Bush
administration.

But is Comey, who now serves on the
board<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/sea-130130-former-us-deputy-attorney-general.pdf>
of
the giant British Lender HSBC, really the guy in the white hat the
commercial media – always enamored of power and not so much principle –
paints him to be?

HSBC must think so. The bank brought Comey onboard, providing him annual
compensation of some $190,000, to serve as window dressing for their
recovery from over-indulging in the illegal drug market. The lender late
last year received aslap on the
wrist<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2012/12/banks-are-where-money-drug-war>
from
the US Department of Justice (paying a relatively small fine compared to
its billions in annual profits in exchange for promising to be good
citizens in the future) — but only after admitting to allowing its US and
Mexican subsidiaries to serve as money-laundering machines for Mexican and
Colombian narco-traffickers.

Comey this past March was brought on board to serve on HSBC’s Financial
Systems Vulnerability Committee — which is supposed to help the bank
improve its legal compliance. So, in some senses, it could be argued Comey
is now collecting a consulting fee that is, in part, being paid to him from
the fruit of drug-money laundering.

However, there is a far more sinister story buried in Comey’s record of
government service that is not likely to be aired publicly in our democracy
by its commercial media, or examined by a self-interested Congress, unless
Narco News, or another independent voice like it, brings that news to light
yet again.

There is little likelihood that these facts about Comey’s past will have
any effect on the PR steamroller that is now clearing the path for his
anointment as the next director of the FBI, arguably the most powerful law
enforcement post in the country and one that he could occupy for at least
10 
years<http://www.fbi.gov/news/news_blog/director-mueller-continues-his-service>
—
well beyond the term of the current president, so this is an issue that
reverberates far beyond simple partisan politics.

In other words, folks, this one really does matter — even if Comey's
appointment is a fait accompli.

According former DEA Special Agent in Charge Sandalio Gonzalez, Comey
played key role in helping to cover up what he describes as “one of the
darkest chapters in the history of US federal law enforcement.”

The case to which Gonzalez is referring is the House of Death — in which a
US government informant assisted, and even participated in, the torture and
murder of a dozen people, mostly Mexican citizens, who were then buried in
the backyard of a house in Juarez, Mexico.

In addition, due to the informant’s Department of Justice-condoned
homicidal activities, a DEA agent and his family were pulled over in the
streets of Juarez by the House of Death killers [Juarez cops working with
the Juarez Drug Organization] and also nearly delivered to the grave —
forcing the DEA to subsequently evacuate all of its personnel from Juarez.

Gonzalez, incensed by the activities of this informant and the complicit of
certain US officials in his murderous rampage, wrote a letter to his
counterpart at US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, denouncing
the informant’s activities and the complicity of federal agents and
prosecutors in the House of Death murders. The informant, Guillermo Ramirez
Peyro (aka, Lalo) was under the supervision of ICE as well as the US
Attorney’s Office for Western Texas — then headed by Johnny Sutton — while
Comey was deputy attorney general and Sutton’s boss.

>From Gonzalez Feb. 24, 2004,
letter,<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/ICE_Letter2.pdf>
directed
to ICE the ICE division head in El Paso:

I’ve had an opportunity to digest what you’ve said as well as to conduct a
careful review of the material in this case. I am now writing to express to
you my frustration and outrage at the mishandling of the (Vicente Carrillo
Fuentes drug organization) investigation that has resulted in unnecessary
loss of human life in the Republic of Mexico, and endangered the lives of
Special Agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and their
immediate families assigned to the DEA Office in (Ciudad Juarez) Mexico.

Gonzalez’ letter made it’s way to then-US Attorney Sutton, who, rather than
investigating the serious charges contained in the letter, instead
complained to his superiors at DOJ headquarters in Washington.

Comey served as deputy attorney general from 2003 to 2005. The House of
Death murders played out between August 2003 and January 2004. The
commercial media, though, to this day has been silent about the ensuing
cover-up orchestrated at the highest levels of DOJ that has assured to this
day that no one in Justice has been held accountable for the House of Death
murders — which were carried out by an informant who had made his US
government handlers aware of his assistance and even participation in the
murders, often in advance of the murders.

>From a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
lawsuit<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/node/1738> filed
in 2006 by a professor at the University of Texas at El Paso:

Between August 2003, and January, 2004, Ramirez [the informant] was sent to
Juarez by ICE for various missions and operations. During that time,
Ramirez witnessed and participated in numerous murders ordered by Heriberto
Santillan Tabares (Santillan), then a high-ranking member of the Juarez
Cartel. Victims, drug dealers and transporters of drugs, were brought to
the house at Calle Parsioneros 3633 in Ciudad Juarez (Parsioneros House),
tortured for information as to the location of drugs or money, and then
murdered.

After each murder, Ramirez reported the murder to agents of ICE. Ramirez
also testified that ICE agents [who were working the case closely with a
DOJ prosecutor] were aware in advance that murders would take place. For
example, the following exchange occurred during testimony at an immigration
hearing <http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/Testimony.pdf>
concerning
Ramirez, who is presently in U.S. custody:

“Lashus [Government Counsel]: Did you tell your — the ICE officers that you
were aware that Mr. Santillan had ordered the deaths of people associated
with the cartel?

Ramirez Peyro: Yes.

Lashus: Did you tell them before, right before it happened?

Ramirez Peyro: Yeah, several occasions. For example, in one occasion in
Chicago, and Santillan talks to me, so I could send the boy there to open
the [Parsioneros] house and me being in Chicago with the agents from ICE,
and they knew because I authorize for them to hear my phone conversations.
And besides that, I told them what’s going on, and in El Paso [federal
agents] they were listening my phone calls.”

DEA commander Gonzalez personally briefed
<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/node/1309>the
staffs of Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Patrick Leahy, D.-Vt.,
about the House of Death carnage and DOJ officials’ complicity in the
murders.

Still, no one at DOJ (which oversees the DEA) or the Department of Homeland
Security (which oversees ICE) has ever been questioned publicly, under
oath, by any member of Congress about their role in allowing the informant,
Ramirez Peyro, himself a former Mexican cop, to participate in murder while
working a case for DOJ — while Comey was managing the department.

In fact, the only investigation ever conducted was an internal agency
probe, known as the JAT, undertaken jointly by DEA and ICE, that to this
day —despite numerous FOIA requests filed by Narco News seeking its release
— remains buried, its findings never made public.

The assertion that Comey played a role in the House of Death cover-up, in
light of his pending nomination to be the top dog at the FBI, should be a
big deal, given one of the FBI’s jobs is to handle informants during
criminal investigations, and to also deal with the intricacies and
sensitivities of law enforcement operations carried out on foreign soil.
Narco News did contact Comey previously
<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/node/1491>to
ask him about his role in the House of Death case, but he declined to
comment.

However, the allegation that he did play some role in the cover-up is not
based on a flimsy six-degrees-of-separation conspiracy theory. There is a
long paper trail illuminating the facts, which has been uncovered by Narco
News over the course of years, but, again, ignored to this day by a
commercial media now fawning over the impending nomination of Comey as the
next FBI director.

“The situation is perplexing, for it appears that both White House staff
and mainstream media have ignored the indisputable facts,” Gonzalez says.
“The House of Death murder cover-up is a total joint fiasco by the
departments of Justice and Homeland Security, and one of the darkest
chapters in the history of U.S. federal law enforcement.

“It is ironic for the president to aggressively preach accountability in
government while nominating as FBI Director the person [Comey] who managed
the Justice Department when those tragic events took place. The people
deserve better.”

*The Paper Trail*

Gonzalez penned his letter to ICE in late February 2004. After Sutton ran
the letter up the DOJ chain of command, then-Associate Deputy Attorney
General Catherin O’Neil, on March 4, 2004, responded with an email titled:
“Possible press involving the DEA (Juarez) ICE Informant issue.”

That email was sent to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft’s chief of
staff, David Ayers, to one of his counsels, Jeff Taylor; and to then-Deputy
Attorney General James B. Comey. Then-DEA Administrator Karen Tandy also
was cced on the email. <http://www.narconews.com/Issue39/article1445.html>

Although some information in the email, discovered via a FOIA request by
Narco News, is redacted, most of the missing information was obtained from
Narco News’ very reliable sources. (In the excerpts below, text that has
been redacted is inside text brackets.)

>From the O'Neil 
>email:<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/emails.pdf>

We just heard from Johnny Sutton that the DEA SAC in El Paso [Special Agent
in Charge Gonzalez] wrote a rather lengthy and inflammatory letter to the
ICE SAC regarding the “mishandling of the [Santillan] investigation that
has resulted in unnecessary loss of human life in the Republic of Mexico
and endangered the lives of (DEA agents).” [REDACTED] and I are getting a
copy of the letter, as well as an ICE response. I am also speaking with
[Sutton] at 8 pm (CST) tonight on this matter. (He was driving and could
not talk at length.)

Please be aware that, according to [Sutton], [REDACTED] has reached out to
get a copy of certain reports of interview of the CI [confidential
informant] in the investigation. The [REDACTED] Times apparently had enough
information to ask for the report which states that the CI [known as
“Lalo”] “supervised the murders” of certain individuals. (Sutton) was not
sure who was talking, but we are certainly concerned that there may be
press and there may be inquiries here in DC as well.…

The next day, March 5, then DEA Administrator Karen Tandy sent off another
email <http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/emailunredacted.jpg>to
O’Neil, Ayers, Taylor and Comey (as well as others within DEA, including
Michele Leonhart, the current DEA administrator) — an email that later
showed up as an exhibit in a court case filed by Gonzalez.

Subject: Re: Possible press involving the DEA Juarez /ICE informant issue

DEA HQ officials were not aware of our el paso SAC’s inexcusable letter
until last evening – although a copy of the letter first landed in the
foreign operations section sometime the day before. The SAC [Gonzalez] did
not tell anyone at HQ that he was contemplating such a letter, and did not
discuss it or share it with HQ until we received the copy as noted above,
well after it was sent.

I apologized to Johnny Sutton last night and he and I agreed on a no
comment to the press. [Emphasis added.]

Mike Furgason, [DEA] Chief of Operations, notified the El Paso SAC last
night that he is not to speak to the press other than a no comment, that he
is to desist writing anything regarding the Juarez matter and related case
and defer to the joint management and threat assessment teams out of HQ –
and he is to relay these directions to the rest of his El Paso Division.

The SAC, who reports to Michele [Leonhart], will be brought in next week
for performance discussions to further address this officially.

So, within a bit more than a week of Gonzalez’ Feb. 24, 2004, letter, which
blew the whistle on US Attorney Sutton and ICE’s role in the House of Death
murders, a cover-up had already been put in motion, with Comey right in the
middle of it.

The “joint management and threat assessment teams” were the same ICE and
DEA agents that prepared the so-called JAT (Joint Assessment Team) report
that was immediately deep-sixed upon its completion in March 2004. The
“SAC” who was to be brought in for “performance discussions” was, in fact,
Gonzalez.

As part of those “discussions,” Gonzalez received a negative
job-performance review as retaliation for writing the letter blowing the
whistle on the House of Death and was eventually pressured into retiring
from DEA. He later filed a discrimination lawsuit against DOJ based, in
part, on the retaliation he suffered after exposing the US government’s
complicity in the House of Death — which led to a dozen gruesome murders
and the near-assassination of a DEA agent and his family. DOJ agreed to
settle the case <http://narcosphere.narconews.com/node/1607> in 2007 and
paid Gonzales and his attorney $385,000.

But as part of that discrimination litigation, both former DEA
Administrator Tandy as well as current DEA Administrator Leonhart were each
compelled to testify under oath about the House of Death cover-up.

Following are some excerpts from those sworn testimonies
<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/node/1491>that
prove Comey was fully aware of the events surrounding the House of Death
murders.

*Jury Trial, Dec. 4, 2006 — Michele Leonhart questioned under oath:*

Q. Okay. Now, did there come a time in which the Office of the Attorney
General, in fact, the Attorney General of the United States himself [John
Ashcroft at the time], wanted to know what was going on with this matter
[the House of Death murders]?

A.. Yes.

Q And was there a plan in place with the acknowledged approval of the
attorney general on how to handle the investigation of what events occurred
in Ciudad Juarez?

A. Yes. *We notified the attorney general of the United States and the
deputy attorney general of the United States [James Comey] of what we had
learned and the events and our concerns. *We told him that we had talked to
customs [ICE] and let them know what we had found out. Our administrator
[then Karen Tandy] had also contacted the U.S. Attorney's Office [Sutton in
San Antonio], and we thought the best thing we could do is get the agencies
together, put an independent review team together to go down and find the
facts because the person I was talking to said he had a different set of
facts and didn't see it the way that we saw it. [Emphasis added.]

Again, that independent review team produced the internal JAT report, which
was buried by DOJ and Homeland Security as part of the House of Death
cover-up.

Following are some excerpts from then-DEA Administrator Tandy’s Aug. 23,
2005, 
deposition,<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/TandyDeposition.pdf>
in
the Gonzalez discrimination lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in
Miami. Tandy is being questioned <http://narcosphere.narconews.com/node/953>by
former DEA agent Gonzalez’ attorney, Richard Diaz.

Diaz: Based on your recollection of the letter, do you believe that
anything that Mr. Gonzalez wrote in the [Feb. 24, 2004] letter was
untruthful?

Tandy: I don’t have a recollection either way. It was such colossally poor,
fatal judgment on Sandy’s [Gonzalez’] part, to get in the middle of what he
knew was a sensitive, established, ongoing process to deal with the issues.

Diaz: Were you aware of the matters that were raised in the letter [which
included the alleged complicity of ICE agents, US prosecutors and a U.S.
informant in mass murder] before you became aware of the letter [Gonzalez’
letter] itself?

Tandy: Absolutely. *I had already briefed the Attorney General [Ashcroft]
and Deputy Attorney General [Comey] on the issues, the underlying issues
with ICE’s handling of this informant, *along with the AUSA [Fielden, who
worked under Sutton and was the federal prosecutor directly overseeing the
House of Death case]. [Emphasis added.]

[Recall: Tandy sent an
e-mail<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/emailunredacted.jpg>
on
March 5, 2004, to a number of high ranking Department of Justice officials
— including Comey — concerning Gonzalez’ letter, indicating that she only
recently became aware of it. In the e-mail, Tandy describes Gonzalez’
letter as “inexcusable” and indicates that she “apologized to Johnny Sutton
… and he and I agreed on a no comment to the press.”]

*Burying the Dead*

And for those who might still have some lingering doubts that a cover-up
did play out in the House of Death case, consider the following events that
took place after Gonzalez was silenced and his letter, along with the JAT
report, were buried in 2004.

• U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton in San Antonio, Texas, announced in April
2005 that his office cut a plea bargain with Heriberto Santillan-Tabares,
who U.S. prosecutors claimed was a top lieutenant in Vicente Carrillo
Fuentes’ Juarez drug organization and who employed Ramirez Peyro (the US
government informant) to oversee the Juarez House of Death—including
assuring the bodies were buried.

Santillan had been charged with cocaine and marijuana smuggling along with
five counts of murder. His case was slated to go to trial in May 2005 in
federal district court in San Antonio.

The plea deal capped more than a year-long effort at that point by DOJ
prosecutors and ICE officials to keep a lid on the US government’s
complicity in multiple murders in the Mexican border town of Ciudad Juarez.
The Santillan case was investigated by federal agents under the
jurisdiction of Sutton, who was plugged into the Bush administration.
Sutton, a former policy coordinator for the Bush-Cheney Transition Team,
served as the Criminal Justice Policy director from 1995-2000 for
then-Governor George W. Bush.

Under the plea deal <http://narcosphere.narconews.com/node/624>, Santillan
was sentenced to 25 years in prison for “conducting a continuing criminal
enterprise,” according to Sutton’s office. However, all of the murder
charges against him were dropped.

A sanguine reading of the plea deal exposes a callous racism was at play in
this case. In other words, because the homicide victims were Mexican
citizens, the murder charges were expendable, particularly if avoiding
prosecution — thereby preventing embarrassing facts from becoming public --
helped to protect the careers of U.S. law enforcers.

• On Feb. 12, 2004, nearly a month after the arrest of Santillan and the
unearthing of the House of Death victims, ICE informant Ramirez Peyro
traveled to the office of the Mexican General Consulate in Dallas, Texas,
to provide a statement to a representative of the Mexican Attorney
General’s Office.

As part of that
statement,<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/InformantState.pdf>
Ramirez
Peyro described a double execution in which he played a participatory role
— and this was after he told ICE
agents<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/ICE.Memo.Aug.25.pdf>
about
his participation in the initial House of Death murder in early August 2003:

Another execution that I remember was on November 23, 2003. The municipal
police of Juarez seized 70 kilograms of marijuana belonging to [Mexican
state police] commander Miguel Loya that was going to be transported via
the Puente Libre (free bridge) in Ciudad Juarez. This seizure caused the
deaths of “Paisa” and “El Chapo” because Santillan ordered me to have these
drug mules meet him in the little Parsioneros house [the House of Death].

In July 2009, Ramirez Peyro also described in detail those same murders
during a recorded interview with Narco News that was aired on Mike
Levine’s Expert
Witness <http://www.expertwitnessradio.org/>show on Pacifica Radio in New
York City.

Following is an excerpt from that
interview<http://www.expertwitnessradio.org/site/the-house-of-death-informant-speaks-hod10/>
:

I call Santilllan … and he said why don’t you come to the house just to
talk. So I said all right and we went to the house and then Santillan
arrived, and then another 15 state police agents, among them Comandante
[Miguel] Loya [a Mexican state police commander who worked as an enforcer
for Santillan].

… So I explain to these guys [Paisa and Chapo] the situation that I already
told them, that they can’t mess with us [the VCF organization]. If they
don’t feel respect for me, they better feel respect for the organization
because behind me there was a very big team of people and they were messing
with all of us.

… In the mean time, Comandante Loya comes for their IDs and he leave for
the kitchen and starts running their names over several channels, and then
Santillan basically repeats what I told to them and then Comandante Loya
repeats it again, and at some point he said, “… You need to cover your
head. Just pull up your shirts and put it around your head.”

So they did it, and he just grabbed them by the neck and put them face down
on the floor. They start to put like some kind of duck tape around their
head, but one of them started doing noise so Comandante Loya made signs to
someone [one of the other state cops] to pass him a gun with a silencer; so
he shot this guy. And this other one, he heard the shots also and started
making noise, so he shot him also.

And so, after driving Paisa and Chapo to the House of Death on Parsioneros
Street in Juarez at the request of Santillan, the informant remains at the
house and threatens the victims just prior to the pair being shot by a
Mexican state police commander while 14 other state cops look on — one
handing Commander Loya a gun with a silencer to carry out the cold-blooded
murders.

The murders of Paisa and Chapo mark the second and third known homicides
carried out at the House of Death in which Ramirez Peyro played a direct
role — either by supervising the murder, as in the case of Mexican attorney
Fernando Reyes, or by delivering the victims to their assassins, as in the
case of Paisa and Chapo.

In both cases, Ramirez Peyro claims he informed his ICE handlers, who were
working the case under the direction of DOJ prosecutors, about his role in
those murders.

In the wake of the unraveling of the House of Death, Ramirez Peyro was
picked up by federal agents and spent nearly six years behind bars, most of
that in solitary confinement, fighting DHS’ efforts to deport him back to
Mexico and to a certain death at the hands of the narco-traffickers he
betrayed.

Ramirez Peyro’s release from jail in April 2010
<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2010/04/house-death-informant-confessed-killer-soon-be-released-jail>came
only after he won a crucial court victory. After ruling against Ramirez
Peyro in several prior decisions, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) in
late March 2010 finally came down on his
side<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2010/03/house-death-informant-wont-be-deported-mexico>,
stating that he “has shown that he more likely than not would be tortured
upon return to Mexico, either directly by government agents or indirectly
by government agents turning him over to the cartel.”

Ramirez Peyro is now living in
hiding<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2011/07/house-death-informant-files-lawsuit-against-us-government>
in
the U.S., maybe in a neighborhood near you.

• Narco News sent a FOIA request to ICE in June 2005, shortly after ICE
agents made threatening
visits<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/al-giordano/2005/05/customs-cops-visit-bill-conroy-with-attack-press-freedom>
to
this journalist’s home and workplace (another newspaper that has nothing to
do with Narco News or its coverage of the House of
Death<http://www.narconews.com/houseofdeath/>
).

During the visits to my home and workplace, the ICE agents were very
ambiguous about their purpose, stating that they only wanted to know my
“source.” They also threatened to get a subpoena from US Attorney Sutton if
I failed to cooperate. Still, I refused to divulge my sources on any
subject.

The ICE agents visited my home and workplace on May 23 and May 24,
respectively. The visits occurred while Narco News was in the thick of its
coverage of the House of Death case. Between March 23 and May 5 of 2005,
Narco News published a series of five stories exposing for the first time
then-US Attorney Johnny Sutton’s role in the cover-up of the House of Death
mass murder and his efforts  (and those of others within DOJ) to retaliate
against the DEA division head who blew the whistle on that cover-up. (That
DEA commander, Gonzalez, served as the Special Agent in Charge of DEA’s El
Paso field office at the time of the House of Death murders and subsequent
government cover-up of a paid ICE informant's role in those homicides.)

ICE stonewalled Narco News FOIA request seeking records detailing the
reason for the ICE agents’ intimidating visits for years but was finally
forced to release some documents in 2010.

An examination of those FOIA documents shows that the offending agents
worked for ICE’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR, aka, internal
affairs), which, like a scene out of Alice in Wonderland, turns out to be
the very same unit that was put in charge of investigating the agents'
intimidating actions against Narco News.

So, ICE OPR essentially investigated itself.

>From the FOIA 
>records<http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/bill-conroy/2010/09/ice-probe-retaliation-against-house-death-reporter-seriously-flawed>
:

On June 4, 2007 [at that point, two years after the so-called investigation
was opened, OPR investigators] interviewed [name blacked out] ASAC
[Assistant Special Agent in Charge], OPR, San Antonio, TX … [He] was
questioned concerning his knowledge of actions taken by [ICE OPR agents] in
connection with their contact with reporter Bill Conroy during May 2005.

… Investigation indicates [ICE OPR agents] contacted reporter Conroy in
furtherance of an official investigation being conducted by the OPR San
Antonio Office [the same city that was the home base of then-U.S. Attorney
Johnny Sutton] and in compliance with a proper directive to do so given by
[name blacked out]. This investigation is closed.

At least one courageous Congresswoman at the time had the guts to call out
the leadership of DOJ and DHS on the intimidation directed against Narco
News. Unfortunately, that kind of courage in Washington is often rewarded
with derision and ostracism — and the Congresswoman did ultimately pay a
price for her tendency to speak truth to power and was eventually voted out
of office.

>From a letter penned by the
Congresswoman<http://www.narconews.com/Issue38/article1375.html> and
directed to top officials at DOJ and DHS:

June 29, 2005

The Honorable Michael Chertoff, Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland
Security Washington, D.C. 20528

Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales U.S. Department of Justice 950
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001

Dear Secretary Chertoff and General Gonzales:

Recent behavior by agents of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security /
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Division – acting in the
jurisdiction of U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton – constituted a violation of
the U.S. Constitutional right of a free press.

I write you to plead that you put a stop to this kind of outrageous
activity in each of your departments and to take measures to prevent such
actions from occurring in the future.

… In particular, General Gonzales, I address this letter to you because
many eyebrows have been raised here in Congress by the confluence of facts
that demonstrate that Mr. Conroy, as a journalist, has reported a series of
stories involving the “House of
Death<http://www.narconews.com/Issue38/article1374.html>”
case in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, in which an undercover informant in the
process of seeking to make a drug case for U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton’s
office, allegedly committed numerous homicides while under the protection
of that office….

Cynthia McKinney U.S. Representative, Fourth District – Georgia

CC: Michael J. Garcia Assistant Secretary U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement 425 I St., NW Washington, D.C., 20536

If you, kind reader, know about the House of Death case, but are not aware
of the extent of the cover-up — nor the fact that it went to the highest
levels of the Department of Justice, including to Comey, who is now,
according to multiple commercial media reports, in line to become the
nation’s next FBI director — it’s because you’ve only read commercial media
accounts of the case intended to sanitize and disappear the cover-up. And
it is that same commercial media
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/comey-in-line-to-become-fbi-director-officials-say/2013/05/29/7a730b0a-c8af-11e2-9f1a-1a7cdee20287_story.html>that
is now attempting to manufacture consent for Comey’s fast-track
Congressional approval to step into the FBI’s top job.

Unfortunately, we can’t expect Congress or the commercial media to do
anything to delve deeper into Comey’s role in the House of Death, or to
force the release of the long-buried JAT report, because to date they
essentially have helped to provide cover for the cover-up.

And it is equally the case that the Obama administration, once Comey is
nominated officially, will have no political incentive to air their own
candidate’s dirty laundry in the House of Death mass murder.

So it seems the die is cast, and we as a nation will likely put a man in
one of the most powerful posts in the nation, a position where he will make
calls daily on civil rights, and life and death, without fully vetting his
role in what former DEA Special Agent in Charge Gonzalez describes as one
of “the darkest chapters in the history of U.S. federal law enforcement.”

That same history demonstrates, over and over again, that a people get the
government they deserve. So, we — us, kind readers — are the last best hope
for the nation. Our media, our Congress, even our president, can remain
silent in the face of injustice only if we, the people, do so as well.

Stay tuned…..


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to