The Military-Industrial-Intelligence- Entertainment Complex:
Hollywood’s Year of Living Clandestinely
By Ed Rampell

Intelligence agencies were ready for their close-up in 2012. Featuring action, 
intrigue, exotic locales, gadgetry and sex, spy thrillers have been a popular 
film genre since silent pic- tures like Fritz Lang’s 1928 “Spies” and early 
talkies, including Alfred Hitchcock’s 1930s’ “The 39 Steps” and “Secret Agent.” 
However, never before in Hollywood history have produc- tions about covert 
operations been lauded with such promi- nent, prestigious prizes. 2012’s 
embarrassment of Emmy, Golden Globe and Oscar riches include:
Showtime’s War on Terror series “Homeland”—about a brainwashed Marine who 
returns from Iraq as part of an Islamist conspiracy to assassinate U.S. 
leaders—was nomi- nated for nine Primetime Emmys, winning six, including for 
Outstanding Drama Series, writing plus acting awards for Claire Danes and 
Damian Lewis. Their performances also scored Golden Globes, while “Homeland” 
won the Best Television Series - Drama Globe.
As 2012 was the 50th anniversary of the first James Bond feature—1962’s “Dr. 
No”—007 movies were hailed during the 85th annual Academy Awards ceremony. A 
montage featuring Sean Connery, Roger Moore, etc., from 23 Bond flicks aired 
during the Feb. 24, 2013 telecast. Shirley Bassey reprised her “Goldfinger” 
song. The new 007 blockbuster, “Skyfall”, was nominated for five Oscars, 
scoring two: For sound editing and Adele’s theme song (which she’d previously 
won a Globe for and performed during the broadcast). “Skyfall” won more Oscars 
than any previous Bond flick, earning as many as Steven Spielberg’s “Lincoln.”
“The Gatekeepers”, which interviews Shin Bet’s ex-chiefs, was nominated for the 
Best Documentary Oscar. Dror Moreh’s film was widely touted by liberals and won 
four critics’ and peace awards because Israel’s internal intelligence service 
heads all endorse ending Israel’s West Bank and Gaza occupations. “The 
Gatekeepers” also hypes espionage tradecraft, from high-tech surveillance to 
targeted assassination, with daunting displays of Israeli intel’s lethal 
prowess.
“Zero Dark Thirty”, which dramatized the CIA/Navy SEAL hunt for Osama bin 
Laden, received five Oscar and four Globe noms. The Hollywood Foreign Press 
Association nom- inated “Zero” in directing, writing and Best Motion Picture 
categories, awarding Jessica Chastain a Best Performance Globe. However, 
Chastain and fellow nominee screenwrit- er Mark Boal failed to strike Oscar 
gold. The production also failed to win for Best Picture, picking up only a 
Sound Editing Oscar (tying with “Skyfall”).
Several in Hollywood, denouncing “Zero” as pro-torture, likening director 
Kathryn Bigelow to Hitler’s favorite filmmaker, Leni Riefenstahl. In 1929 
German star Emil Jannings became the first Best Actor Oscar winner; in 1941 
Nazi Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels pulled a P.R. coup, naming 
Jannings—who’d left Tinseltown, returning to the Third Reich—“Artist of the 
State.” But it’s unlikely the cunning Goebbels could have surpassed the stage 
managed crowning achievement of Hollywood’s year of living clandestinely.
The coup de grace of heaping laurels upon the brows of 2012 spy-fi occurred at 
the end of the Academy Awards, with a breathtakingly brazen propagandistic act 
totally unparalleled in Oscar’s annals: Ergo, “Argo”, an ersatz adventure pic 
celebrating CIA rescuers of Americans hiding in Iran, nominated for five Globes 
and seven Academy Awards.
On Jan. 13, 2013 the HFPA awarded Ben Affleck its Best Director honor and 
“Argo” the Globe for Best Motion Picture - Drama. This foreshadowed 
La-La-Land’s strangest salute to screen spies. During the Feb. 24 Oscar 
telecast “Argo” won an editing award and Chris Terrio for Best Writing. Then, 
amidst the Hollywood hullabaloo, the most bizarre bal- lyhooing in Motion 
Picture Academy of Arts and Sciences history took place, turning the show’s 
venue into the Dolby Theatre of the absurd. As Jack Nicholson went onstage to 
present the Best Motion Picture Oscar the live telecast cut from Hollywood to 
Washington. Via satellite transmission Michelle Obama appeared to reveal the 
winner from the White House’s Diplomatic Reception Room, surrounded by 
uniformed military personnel.
Never has a member of the First Family ever announced an Oscar winner in any 
category, let alone Best Picture. Even stranger, one of the nine nominees 
extolled a mission the First Lady’s husband ordered and Barack appeared in. The 
Best Picture victor turned out to be another unabashedly pro-CIA movie. Mrs. 
Obama opened the envelope and declared “Argo”—containing footage of her 
husband’s Democratic predecessor, Jimmy Carter—had snared movie- dom’s highest 
honor.
Executed like a top secret mission, Michelle’s participation is not totally 
unprecedented. In 1941 FDR made a radio speech broadcast during the Oscars. In 
1981’s telecast— delayed due to the attempt on his life—ex-actor Pres. Reagan 
addressed the audience via a prerecorded message shot at the Executive Mansion. 
In 2002 during a pre-taped montage with notables expressing “What Do the Movies 
Mean to You?” Laura Bush discussed “Giant.” In January 2013 ex-Pres. Clinton 
introduced “Lincoln” live at the Globes ceremony. But Michelle is the only 
First Family member to open the en- velope and declare an Oscar winner. Her 
appearance prompt- ed outspoken actor Ed Asner to quip: “I guess you could say 
we have our own Leni Riefenstahl.” The Academy declined interview requests.
A week before the Oscar ceremony activists were demonstrating against
Argo--a motion picture ode to Hollywood’s collaboration with the CIA vis-a-vis 
covert operations.
Director co/star Ben Affleck
took the stage with co-producers George Clooney and Grant Heslov (who could not 
be reached for comment). Earlier during the ceremony Affleck’s wife, Jennifer 
Garner, was an Oscar presenter; during her husband’s acceptance speech the 
telecast cut to her in the audience. Garner not only starred as CIA double 
agent Sydney Bristow in the TV series “Alias” but actually made a 2004 CIA 
recruitment ad. (The same actor who’d played Sydney’s CIA agent father in 
“Alias’”— Victor Garber—portrayed the Canadian ambassador who hid “Argo’s” 
American escapees from Iranians.)
“Argo” is a motion picture ode to Hollywood collaboration with the CIA 
vis-à-vis covert operations. With a film touting and endorsing CIA and movie 
industry collusion and trick- ery, given the seal of approval by Michelle and 
Nicholson, Hollywood flew over the cuckoo’s nest as three branches of power 
specializing in make-believe—TV/cinema, the CIA and Executive Branch—merged to 
pull the wool over Americans’ eyes.
The Cinematic Spies Who Lured Us
Just as the “news” media was enlisted to spread intelli- gence-generated lies 
before the Iraq War, in 2012 intelligence agencies hid in plain sight, using 
television and movies to spread disinformation. According to IMDB.com 2012’s 
spy productions received 365 nominations and awards. Audiences willingly 
suspend disbelief in dreamlike states in the dark, watching the screen under 
the illusion that, as actor and CounterPuncher David Clennon says, “Hey, it’s 
just a movie!” Instead, unsuspecting viewers are often bombarded by agit- prop 
parading as “entertainment” that’s rarely acknowledged as being influenced by 
secretive sources.
Academic Tricia Jenkins writes in “The CIA in Hollywood, How the Agency Shapes 
Film and Television” that in 1996 Agency veteran Chase Brandon (Tommy Lee 
Jones’ first cousin) was appointed the CIA’s Entertainment Liaison Officer in 
order to respond to the Cold War’s end, which left many questioning the need 
for the CIA, while the case of Aldrich Ames—the Agency’s Soviet 
counterintelligence head caught committing treason—hurt the Company’s 
reputation. Needing damage control and an image upgrade, the Agency turned to 
Hollywood.
Decorated ex-CIA officer Bob Baer, who Clooney won an Oscar for portraying in 
“Syriana”, adds “it started with a guy named Chris Straub, who was working for 
Sen. Bob Kerrey, a Democrat. Bob Kerrey was worried that the CIA was getting 
such bad press, undeservedly, that it was time for the CIA to sit down and 
consciously help Hollywood to get the message out there that espionage is not 
bad... It was about that time
that Chase Brandon was put in his job...” (According to a 2001 CounterPunch 
article Kerrey “murdered... a dozen women and children... on a CIA mission” in 
Vietnam.)
In exchange for script approval the ELO provides CIA as- sistance and access to 
its personnel and Langley, Va. head- quarters, use of its copyrighted seal, 
etc., to productions de- picting it favorably. Asner says this quid-pro-quo 
“stinks,” but Jenkins notes, “It’s the money shot in the spy genre when they 
walk across that seal in the lobby floor.” The Agency’s P.R. of- fensive bore 
fruit by 2001’s Fall TV season, when three series premiered with CIA themes.
Clennon played CIA officer Joshua Nankin in “The Agency” and insists the 
Company played a major role in molding the CBS show, which ex-Marine Bazzel 
Baz, who’d been in CIA special ops, “was the CIA technical advisor for.” It 
became “the first television program granted permission to film at CIA 
headquarters,” according to Jenkins’ 2012 book, which quotes 
telewriter/executive producer Michael Frost Beckner saying: “Chase [Brandon] 
and [Director of Central Intelligence George] Tenet agreed to assist us...”
In fact, Clennon says, “There was going to be a premiere screening of the pilot 
episode at CIA headquarters before it went on the air... Leslie Moonves 
[president] of CBS [and] the assistant director of the CIA was going to be 
there, it’s possible Tenet was going to be there, it was going to be a big red 
carpet premiere, because this was something they were comfortable with. The 
creator of the series, Beckner, was a big admirer of... and very cozy with... 
the CIA and he had been briefed, informed, backgrounded by the CIA.”
However, the Sept. 18, 2001 opening night at Langley was preempted by the Sept. 
11th terrorist attacks. Clennon adds, “the pilot is spooky in that it 
anticipates a 9/11-type event, only taking place in London” by Al-Qaeda, which 
plots to attack what one character calls “an international symbol of 
consumerism.” Tony Mendez—the CIA operative Affleck plays in “Argo”—had a 
technical consultant credit for the pilot. (A different episode aired when “The 
Agency” debuted Sept. 20.)
The other CIA series premiering around 9/11 were ABC’s “Alias” and Fox’s “24.” 
Clennon—who won an Emmy for “Dream On” and was Emmy-nominated for “thirtysome- 
thing”, appeared in “Bound for Glory”, “Coming Home”, “Missing,” “Syriana” and 
“J. Edgar”—says Hollywood story- telling techniques serve hidden agendas.
“Actors are profoundly responsible for what they do,” con- tends Clennon. 
“Kiefer Sutherland is profoundly responsible for the acceptance of torture by 
the general public because of what he did in ‘24.’ He made torture acceptable. 
Cheney,
Bush and Rumsfeld, who all decided on the torture policy, enhanced 
interrogation, they could never have sold torture to the American people... 
[as] necessary and effective. It would never have happened without Kiefer 
Sutherland,” “24’s” handsome leading man playing Counter Terrorist Unit agent/
missed an opportunity.” The National Religious Campaign Against Torture’s Paz 
Artaza-Regan declared: “There’s no grounding in ethics and morality in ‘Zero 
Dark Thirty’, or even of the effectiveness of torture... We want the Senate 
Intelligence Committee’s 6,000 page report made public. The
torturer Jack Bauer, “a model and a hero for Guantanamo in- terrogators,” 
states Clennon, citing Philippe Sands’ “Torture Team.”
For Clennon this mixture of sadism and sex appeal also holds for “Zero Dark 
Thirty”: “Our heroine, who inflicts torture, is a dedicated CIA officer played 
by a very beautiful young woman [Chastain]. This draws us in so we root for a 
coldblooded murderer.”
Using attractive leads helps draw audiences to the conclu- sion that while 
torture may be reprehensible it’s effective, ren- dered acceptable by supposed 
results yielded via “enhanced interrogation techniques,” such as waterboarding. 
Many disagree. At a Feb. 17 anti-torture program in Hollywood’s United 
Methodist Church attorney Cindy Pánuco, who rep- resents Gitmo detainee 
Obaidulla, said: “Not one character in the movie decried what we did, the 
violating of laws. The film
U.S. public demands accountability.” But “Zero” went into wide release while 
the Senate report
remains classified. The film opens with a title stating it’s based on 
“firsthand accounts”—but doesn’t state from who. “Clearly, ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ 
had CIA assistance,” asserts Jenkins. “They were invested in assisting that 
film because it does depict the CIA to be so efficient or so successful... Both 
the writer and the director... met with lots of people at the CIA... Bigelow, 
Boal and their assistants contacted the CIA’s office of public affairs to 
discuss setting up meetings with CIA personnel. They were asked for an advance 
copy of the script... Because the script depicted the CIA very positive- ly... 
it met the CIA’s standards... of a project they’d support. Then they had 
meetings arranged with the CIA’s then-Acting Director of Central 
Intelligence... Mike Morrell, the Director of the counter-terrorism center and 
others in the Agency, like
Raid on Bin Laden Compound, still from Zero Dark Thirty”. Sony Pictures.

Michael Vickers, a former CIA operative and Undersecretary of Defense for 
Intelligence, that was partly responsible for lo- cating bin Laden... and 
Jeremy Bash, who was Leon Panetta’s chief of staff and a translator involved in 
the raid. They also got a tour of the ‘vault’, the room where the operation was 
monitored... and... of the CIA’s basic facility” at Langley.
Baer, a consultant for 2007’s “Rendition”, 2010’s “Red” and the upcoming “Jack 
Ryan”, believes “they were also given access to SEAL Team 6... I still don’t 
know who, if anybody, pressed on the filmmakers the idea that torture worked. 
There are certain people in the Directorate of Operations that made that case. 
But I’ve seen no evidence waterboarding led to the capture of Osama bin Laden.”
Other 2012 espionage award winners also collaborated with the Company. Jenkins 
says, “Claire Danes visited the
Declassified” Affleck admits he met with the CIA Director and other agents and 
permitted to shoot inside of Langley. “Argo” explicitly lionizes Hollywood’s 
collaboration with a CIA covert mission. John Goodman plays makeup man four- 
time Emmy Award nominee John Chambers, who designed Mr. Spock’s ears, won an 
Oscar for 1968’s “Planet of the Apes”—plus created prosthetics and disguises 
for the Agency.
“Argo’s” hagiography never mentions that the CIA it cele- brates as rescuers 
also overthrew Iran’s democratically elected government, re-installed the Shah 
and colluded with Savak’s torture of political prisoners, which led to 1979’s 
Iranian Revolution and “hostage crisis.” “Operation Ajax”—the 1953 coup—was 
masterminded by Kermit Roosevelt (Teddy’s grandson), chief of the C.I.A.’s Near 
East and Africa division. “Argo” is also rehashs the 1981 made-for-TV movie 
“Escape
As part of a communications counter-offensive, clandestine organizations turn 
to mass entertainment to polish their tarnished images, using perceived 
triumphs to generate positive perceptions of the agencies.
CIA and met with a couple of female operatives to find out what their job was 
like... The writers had secured through the CIA’s public affairs office... 
[Howard Gordon] the writer for ‘Homeland’ was executive producer, also worked 
on ‘24.’ He had some assistance for a season of ‘24.’”
New Zealand’s parliament passed a critical motion, Iran is considering suing 
and Canada expressed displeasure because of their depictions in “Argo”, which 
Andrew O’Hehir called “a propaganda fable” and “wholesale fictionalization” in 
Salon. Baer, who was in Iran in 1978, says, “I know there was no big 
confrontation at the airport,” nor did the dra- matic bazaar visit occur. 
Jenkins adds: “There’s lots of his- torical inaccuracies in it... There was a 
CIA-assisted text... When I interviewed Tony Mendez ... in like 2008 he did say 
he was making arrangements for the writer of that script to visit with the CIA. 
... I’m pretty sure Ben Affleck was able to get meetings with those in the 
CIA... He was in [2002’s] ‘The Sum of All Fears’, a heavily assisted text by 
the CIA. They were involved in everything from set design to script review to 
meeting with the actors, director, writers... [Tom Clancy’s] Jack Ryan series 
has always been more positive in terms of its depiction of the CIA than other 
film franchises, but... ‘Sum of All Fears’ of all Jack Ryan films is the most 
positive in its depiction.”
Jenkins writes: “Affleck and [‘Sum’s”] director, Phil Alden Robinson, also met 
with DCI George Tenet and other high-ranking officials”; the filmmakers were 
allowed aerial and exterior shots of CIA HQ. In the documentary “Argo:
12
>From Iran: The Canadian Caper”, written by Hollywood arch- reactionary Lionel 
>Chetwynd.
Operation Image Control
Public perception of the world’s best financed intel organi- zations plummeted 
after failing to prevent 9/11. CIA Director George Tenet called allegations 
regarding Iraqi WMDs “a slum dunk” and sat mutely behind Secretary of State 
Colin Powell at the U.N. while he lied about Saddam’s WMDs in February 2003, 
for which Tenet won the Presidential Medal of Freedom. CIA practices such as 
torture, destruction of vid- eotapes of enhanced interrogations, extraordinary 
renditions, targeted killings and the Raymond Allen Davis incident which 
outraged Pakistan further besmirched the CIA’s stand- ing. More recently, the 
Benghazi embassy attack and Boston marathon bombing triggered “intelligence 
failures” charges against the cloak-and-dagger community.
“The CIA has become very much an antechamber of the Pentagon,” Baer maintains. 
“In the sense that it’s drones, and it’s only drones, and supporting the 
military in Iraq and Afghanistan. That’s not the CIA I know... It’s very much a 
military organization, it caters to the Pentagon.”
Drone warfare is so secretive it’s difficult to tally casual- ties; in February 
Sen. Lindsay Graham estimated 4,700 fa- talities. According to the Bureau for 
Investigative Journalism up to 1,727 people have been injured and up to 4,379 
people killed by U.S. drone strikes from 2002-2013 in Pakistan, Yemen and 
Somalia, including up to 209 children.
These CIA-linked policies spark outrage. In January an investigation into drone 
warfare led by U.N. Special Rapporteur Ben Emmerson began. In March, after 
meeting government officials and victims of unmanned aerial vehicles in 
Islamabad Emmerson stated “the U.S. drone campaign... violat[es] Pakistan’s 
sovereignty.”
Since 9/11 the CIA committed some of its biggest blun- ders and dirtiest dirty 
tricks—but the show must go on. Call it “Operation Image Control”: On the one 
hand, “The Obama administration has been cruelly and unusually punishing in its 
use of the 1917 Espionage Act to stomp on governmental leakers, truth-tellers, 
and whistleblowers... charg[ing] more people (six) under the Espionage Act for 
the alleged mis- handling of classified information than all past presidencies 
combined... [including] former CIA officer John Kiriakou, charged for allegedly 
disclosing classified information to journalists about the horrors of 
waterboarding,” according to Peter Van Buren’s 2012 Mother Jones article. 
However, at the same time Bradley Manning and WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange face 
the iron heel, 007 kills the messenger in “Skyfall”, its Bond villain a 
computer hacktivist revealing MI-6’s top secrets online, played by Javier 
Bardem wearing an Assange- like blondish wig.
As part of this communications counteroffensive clandes- tine organizations 
again turn to mass entertainment to polish tarnished images, using perceived 
triumphs to generate positive perceptions. As Jenkins says, “The CIA gets a lot 
of credit” for liquidating bin Laden and sought to maximize this P.R. 
opportunity. Baer asserts: “When we’ve got two incon- clusive wars—the War on 
Terror costing $6 trillion, and what do we get for it except one dead Saudi? I 
think it’s important that some of the news be good and it was important to the 
White House. This president cannot be seen as anti-CIA or anti-military... 
Obama was basically saying in a very political decision: ‘Look, I did more 
drones, I killed bin Laden’...”
“Argo” flashbacked 33 years to exalt the Agency. “This is a victory the CIA was 
able to pull off,” Jenkins notes. “It was an intelligence and White House 
community success. In some ways, just visually, [Michelle’s] presence with the 
military personnel behind her does create visual links of a celebration of 
government agencies and their success.” Mrs. Obama an- nounced “Argo’s” Oscar 
while Brennan’s confirmation as CIA Director nominee was pending.
So why is this Tinseltown trend—which includes FX’s Cold War-set series “The 
Americans” and HBO’s documen- tary “Manhunt”, about the CIA’s bin Laden 
pursuit, which premiered May 1—happening now? Jenkins points out: “One reason 
might be that after Chase Brandon left as CIA Entertainment Liaison Officer 
from 1995 to 2006 and Paul Barry departed in 2008 those duties were shared 
among the Public Affairs Office’s four person media relations team, and they 
only appointed another ELO about a year ago,” coincid- ing with espionage 
productions’ renaissance.
“There’s a real attempt to sanitize CIA killings and glorify the CIA and give 
it a new face,” declares Code Pink’s Medea Benjamin. “That’s what happened with 
‘Zero Dark Thirty’, that’s what happened with Michelle Obama... When she ap- 
peared my jaw dropped; I couldn’t believe it... It was really a disgusting 
propaganda film, as well as ‘Argo’, glorifying the role of the CIA... The fact 
that this was happening while the CIA is in one of its darkest periods ever in 
the history of this country—there have been several times in our history when 
the CIA has gone rogue, and this is one of them.”
CounterPunch contacted the CIA’s PAO and its current Entertainment Liaison 
Officer, Ian. The cartoonish secretive- ness of the female receptionist and Ian 
(no last name provid- ed) suggested the screen spies Boris and Natasha from 
Rocky and Bullwinkle; Ian and the PAO declined interview requests.
On His President’s Secret Service
Conservatives grouse about government support of the arts. Ironically, the 
CIA’s preferential treatment of projects actually subsidizes rightwing 
productions by providing as- sistance and access solely to works favorably 
depicting it. In her book Jenkins quotes constitutional law scholar Erwin 
Chemerinsky: “the Supreme Court has said that above all, the First Amendment 
means that the government cannot partici- pate in viewpoint discrimination.” 
But the CIA, a taxpayer- funded government agency, blatantly practices 
perspective bias.
Jenkins also argues that self-aggrandizing puffery in CIA- supported 
productions violates publicity and propaganda laws. Viewers need “truth in 
advertising,” labeling all works supported by covert agencies.
Just as “Argo” neglects the CIA’s role in overthrowing Iran’s legitimate 
government in 1953, “Zero” never cites the collaboration between the CIA and 
bin Laden during the mujahedeen’s holy war against the U.S.S.R. Nor does HBO’s 
“Manhunt,” flattery fobbed off as “nonfiction” filmmak- ing, hailing CIA 
analysts as conquering heroes for pursuing Osama, although CIA support of this 
terrorist during the an- ti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan isn’t mentioned. If 
they’re such Einsteins, why did the CIA collaborate with such a dangerous 
extremist? Why couldn’t these Brainiacs deduce the possible blowback from being 
a superpower busybody playing footsy with fanatics? No shit, Sherlocks!
Not all filmmakers collude with spy-dom. Robert De Niro directed and co-starred 
with Matt Damon in 2006’s “The Good Shepherd”, a bold critique of CIA history, 
and spoofs spooks in the “Meet the Fockers” franchise.
In 2003’s “The Recruit” Al Pacino plays a CIA instructor who tells trainees: 
“We reveal our failures but not our successes.” As Moore’s montage reveals, CIA 
Realpolitik “successes” are far more terrifying than its “failures.” As Louie 
Armstrong’s “What a Wonderful World” ironically plays footage of various 
overthrows, covert actions—many by the CIA—is shown, including coups in Iran, 
Guatemala, Chile, the Indochina wars, Central America’s wars and Iran-Contra. 
As a jet flies into the Twin Towers the title proclaims: “Sept. 11, 2001: Osama 
bin Laden uses his expert CIA training to murder 3,000 people.”
Nobel Peace Laureate Obama may weep for Sandy Hook’s butchered children, but 
his drones killed 10 times more children than Adam Lanza did. Were he alive 
Lanza might quote Charlie Chaplin playing the serial wife murderer in 1947’s 
“Monsieur Verdoux” who compares himself to politicians: “As a mass killer, I am 
an amateur by comparison.”
The Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Entertainment Complex uses armed 
aggression to attain foreign policy objectives, then heralds perpetrators of 
these covert actions in disguised “amusements” for mass audiences in an endless 
cycle of murder and mayhem, perpetuating a cult of violence from Waziristan to 
Newtown, on- and offscreen. 
Ed Rampell is an L .A .-based film historian, critic and author who wrote 
Progressive Hollywood, A People’s Film History of the United States.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to