ROSENBERG CHILDREN SPEAK OF THEIR PARENT’S EXECUTION 60 YEARS AGO TODAY

June 19, 2013 at 06:04
(Activism<http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/category/activism/>
, Espionage <http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/category/espionage/>,
History<http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/category/history/>
)
Sixty years ago today, Ethel and Julius Rosenberg were legally murdered by
the United States government. Today, their children see that horror as a
force for good …
***
*Today, the US government asserts that danger from the international
terrorist conspiracy and their weapons of mass destruction justifies
massive surveillance, indefinite detention and even torture. Authorities
say we must guard national secrets even more securely to avoid destruction.
Today, the issues raised by the Rosenberg case resonate from the Oval
Office of the White House to Bradley Manning, who is being tried under the
Espionage Act of 1917, as were Ethel and Julius.*
*
*Out of the horror of the Rosenbergs’ executions, a force for good*
Our relatives’ trial for espionage marked a nadir of cold war paranoia.
Now, 60 years on, we have our ‘constructive revenge’
Robert Meeropol and Jenn Meeropol
*
[image: 
Julius-and-Ethel-Rosenber-007]<http://desertpeace.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/julius-and-ethel-rosenber-007.jpg>

 Julius and Ethel Rosenberg during their trial for espionage in New York in
1951. The couple were executed in 1953 after being found guilty of spying
for the Soviet Union. Photograph: AP
*

We are Robert and Jenn Meeropol, son and granddaughter of Ethel and Julius
Rosenberg<http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/julius-and-ethel-rosenberg-executed>.
We are acutely aware of the political lessons to be drawn from the
conviction and execution of the Rosenbergs at the height of the McCarthy
period. The charge was conspiracy to commit
espionage<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/espionage>,
but our family members were presented as traitors who gave the Soviet Union
the secret of the atomic bomb.

The US government used the Rosenberg case to attempt to prove to the public
that the international communist conspiracy threatened the American way of
life, and claimed fighting communism required that human rights and civil
liberties take a back seat to national security.

Today, the US government asserts that danger from the international
terrorist conspiracy and their weapons of mass destruction justifies
massive surveillance, indefinite detention and even torture. Authorities
say we must guard national secrets even more securely to avoid destruction.
Today, the issues raised by the Rosenberg case resonate from the Oval
Office of the White House to Bradley Manning, who is being tried under the
Espionage Act of 1917, as were Ethel and Julius.

But there are other, more personal, lessons to draw as well.

>From the ages of three to seven, I, Robert, lived a nightmare. After my
parents’ arrest, relatives were too frightened to take my brother Michael
and me into their homes, so we were dumped in a shelter. After the
executions, we were thrown out of the New Jersey state school system when
local residents found out about our parentage.

In 1954, in a politically motivated attempt to separate us from Rosenberg
supporters, Michael and I were seized by New York City police from the home
of our prospective adoptive parents and placed in an orphanage. But Abel
and Anne Meeropol won the ensuing custody battle, our last name was changed
to theirs, and we dropped from public sight for almost two decades. During
those growing-up years, I dreamed of revenge.

I, Jenn, was two years old when my father and uncle decided to reclaim
their heritage by mounting a public campaign to force the US government to
release secret files relating to the Rosenbergs case. My dad worried that
his actions might expose me to trauma and fear, similarly to his childhood
experience. I was safe in my family but profoundly aware of what had
happened to my grandparents. I grew up with sadness and anger about what
was done to Ethel and Julius, as well as a fierce pride in who they were
and what they stood for.

As I entered college in 1990, my father started the Rosenberg Fund for
Children (RFC) <http://www.rfc.org/>, a public foundation to help
children<http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/children> who
are experiencing similar nightmares to what he lived through as a child.
The RFC is a way to transform the destruction placed on his family into a
positive force to benefit a new generation of families, the way a community
of support rallied to aid him and his brother after their parents were
killed.

As a young adult, I watched the RFC help hundreds of children who grew up
with political targeting in their families. I realized that they probably
endured a similar stew of emotions – sorrow and anger, pride and obligation
– to my dad’s, and my own. Growing up, I also dreamed of getting
retribution from the forces that killed my grandparents before I could know
them.

I joined the RFC’s staff in 2007 as granting coordinator. Now, during this
60th anniversary year of my grandparents’ execution, my father will retire
as executive director and I will take over the helm of the organization he
founded.

We both think of the RFC as our revenge – our constructive revenge. When
bad things happen to people, to families and communities, it is natural to
want to strike back, to settle the score. The wish to avoid being a passive
victim is healthy, but revenge itself is usually destructive. For us,
harnessing our desire to strike back and focusing it on creating a positive
response is personally satisfying, and our contribution to making a
positive difference in the world.


19TH JUNE 1953 THE EXECUTION OF JULIUS AND ETHEL ROSENBERG

Ethel and Julius Rosenberg

Today marks the 60th anniversary of the execution of Julius and Ethel
Rosenberg in the electric chair at New York’s Sing Sing prison. Convicted
of conspiring to pass atomic secrets to the Soviet Union, the Rosenbergs –
who maintained their innocence to the bitter end – were the only US
citizens to be executed under the Espionage Act, in what has been described
as the most controversial death sentence in US history. The spectacular
trial and unprecedented severe sentencing of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg
during the height of Cold War hysteria shook America to its core, and
generated worldwide condemnation. Jean-Paul Sartre denounced the executions
as “a legal lynching that has covered a whole nation with blood.” Over half
a century later, disturbing truths about the Rosenberg case and the
American government’s complicity in a frame-up remain unresolved.

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were a devoted couple with two young sons.
Growing up in a poor Jewish neighbourhood of New York’s Lower East Side,
they’d both regularly witnessed the horrors of pre-war American social
injustice: evictions of families from tenements onto the streets,
soup-kitchen queues extending for blocks, malnourished children forced to
eat out of garbage cans. *“You had to be dead from the neck up to not feel
radical,”* said a friend of the couple, speaking about the era. And for
such highly politicised radicals as the Rosenbergs, communism presented a
viable alternative. But just how far did their admiration for the Soviet
Union extend?

In July 1950, the Rosenbergs were arrested on suspicion of passing
information to the Soviets. On 6th March 1951, the couple and
co-conspirator Morton Sobell went on trial in New York City for conspiracy
to commit espionage during WW2 (when the Soviets were still America’s
wartime allies). The principal prosecution witness against the Rosenbergs
was Ethel’s younger brother, David Greenglass, who confessed to spying and
agreed to testify in exchange for promises that his wife would not be
charged and he would be spared the death penalty in his own trial.
Greenglass had worked on the Manhattan atom bomb project as a low-level
engineer without any access to or knowledge of the weapon’s intricacies. He
was allegedly the source of information on the bomb’s “secret”, having
provided an amateur and inaccurate drawing of the bomb to Julius on the
back of a Jell-O packet. He would later admit he’d lied on the witness
stand. According to the federal prosecutor, another witness, Harry Gold,
the confessed American accomplice of British spy Klaus Fuchs, was “the
necessary link in the chain that points indisputably to the guilt of the
Rosenbergs.” Gold would also later confess: “I lied so often it’s a wonder
steam didn’t come out of my ears.” The Rosenbergs were found guilty on
29th March
1951. One week later, Judge Irving R. Kaufman sentenced the couple to death
– declaring their crime to be “worse than murder,” and blaming them
personally for 50,000 casualties of  the Korean War.

The appointment of a biased judge, the grooming of witnesses by the FBI,
the secret and illegal meetings between the chief prosecutor and Judge
Kaufman, perjured testimonies, fabricated evidence and the pervading
demagogic McCarthyism all point to a trial so monumentally corrupt as to
amount to a frame-up. But it was the severity of the death sentence that
shocked the world. Convicted British spies Alan Nunn May and Klaus Fuchs
received ten and fourteen years respectively. The Rosenbergs’
co-conspirators also received comparatively light sentences. Reviewing the
case in 1966, law professor Alexander M. Bickel wrote, “The Rosenberg case
is … a ghastly and shameful episode. There is first of all the death
sentence, and secondly the death sentence, and thirdly the death sentence,
and then again the death sentence.”

The imposition of the death sentence, however, was itself the tragic result
of a failed prosecution strategy. At least a month before the trial began,
the Justice Department discussed the usefulness of the death penalty as a
device to force the Rosenbergs to confess and possibly implicate others.
The Rosenbergs called their bluff. Even though a confession from one could
have saved the other, they both refused to admit guilt or blow the whistle
on anyone else.

So, were the Rosenbergs spies? Recent declassified documents of the
Soviet’s Venona Project certainly point a guilty finger at Julius. But the
same de-coded information proves that Ethel played no role at all. Was
Julius responsible for passing the “atomic secret” to the Soviet Union,
thus perpetrating the Korean War no less? According to the Soviets, the
information received through Julius was of virtually no use. Their own
scientists were brilliant enough to need not rely on an amateur drawing on
the back of a Jell-O packet.

After all these years, what remains certain is this: the Rosenbergs were
not guilty as charged. Their conviction was based upon perjured testimony
and fabricated evidence; government agents and agencies orchestrated a
frame-up which resulted in their execution. The sham trial and severe
sentencing of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg in a country baying for commie
blood has been likened to a witch hunt. Remembering the Rosenbergs’ on the
occasion of the 50th anniversary of their execution, *the New York
Times* wrote:
“[The case] still haunts American history, reminding us of the injustice
that can be done when a nation gets caught up in hysteria”.

Indeed, to all those who wonder how the German people could have
collectively fallen under the spell of Adolf Hitler, we need only look back
at America in the grip of McCarthyism for similar evidence of national mass
psychosis.

http://www.onthisdeity.com/19th-june-1953-%E2%80%93%C2%A0the-execution-of-julius-and-ethel-rosenberg/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to