Is Egypt's military about to overthrow an elected president? 
Hard to say anything certain about Egypt now. But the military has 
thrust itself to the center of politics again as the democratic 
transition falters.
By Dan Murphy, Staff writer / July 1, 2013 
        *  
An Egyptian girl chants slogans at a demonstration against Egypt's 
Islamist President Mohammed Morsi during a rally in Tahrir Square in 
Cairo, Monday, July 1, 2013. 
Manu Brabo/AP 

The 48-hour ultimatum issued today by Egypt's unelected military 
brass comes amid a wave of protests that appear to dwarf the popular 
uprising that drove Egypt's military-backed dictator Hosni Mubarak from 
power 27 months ago.
  Dan Murphy 
Staff writer
Dan Murphy is a staff writer for the Monitor's international desk, 
focused on the Middle East. Murphy, who has reported from Iraq, 
Afghanistan, Egypt, and more than a dozen other countries, writes and 
edits Backchannels. The focus? War and international relations, leaning 
toward things Middle East.
        *  
In Pictures Egypt Grapples with an Uncertain Future
Recent posts
        * 07.01.13
Is Egypt's military about to overthrow an elected president?  
        * 06.27.13
America's deadliest soldier? Dillard Johnson says he never made that claim. 
        * 06.26.13
America's deadliest soldier or stolen valor?  
        * 06.25.13
The US demands Russia give up Snowden: Thanks, says Putin. 


        * Terrorism & Security  As Egypt nears boil, leading religious 
institution calls for calm (+video)  
        * The Monitor's View  After protests, what Egypt can learn from Mandela 
 
  
While what happens next is anyone's guess, Egypt is undoubtedly in 
its most dangerous moment since former President Hosni Mubarak's ouster 
in 2011. The military is front and center in Egypt's politics once more; the 
Muslim Brotherhood feels cornered and threatened by what it deems 
to be counter-revolutionaries; and the crowds in Tahrir Square and 
elsewhere are demanding something different – but what they want, 
exactly, is far from clear.
Today Egypt's so-called democratic 
transition is a failure, with the strongest evidence of that the 
rapturous crowds chanting their love for the Army and the Supreme 
Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF). In January and February 2011, a 
massive show of street power led SCAF to dump Mubarak overboard. Then 
came a period of ham-handed military rule, with show trials of 
activists, organized sexual assault on female protesters (what else to 
call the so-called "virginity tests" forced on them within weeks of the 
military takeover?) and the torture of democracy activists like Ramy Essam. 
Eventually, the military appeared to back out of politics and 
reasonably free elections were held, first for a parliament that was 
packed with members of the Muslim Brotherhood and its Islamist allies, 
and then a squeaker of a presidential election that saw the 
Brotherhood's Mohamed Morsi narrowly defeat Ahmed Shafiq , a retired Air Force 
general who served in Mubarak's cabinet for eight years and as 
his last prime minister.
Since then, the parliament was dissolved 
by court order, a new Constitution written mostly by the Muslim 
Brotherhood was rushed through, and many of Egypt's democracy protesters who 
backed Morsi as the candidate of change over a longtime Mubarak 
servant have come to rue the choice. Inflation has jumped, government 
receipts have fallen, and anger over Morsi's failings has swept away 
Egyptians' anger about decades of authoritarian rule.
Now the 
canny military is once again the darling of many at Tahrir, who seem to 
welcome a soft military coup as the best option for the country. Steven 
Cook, a keen observer of Egyptian politics, marvels at how the generals – with 
the help of incompetent civilian politicians – have rehabilitated their image.
Of all the arresting images that emerged from yesterday’s mass protests in 
Egypt, the ones that struck me most were those of military helicopters 
dropping Egyptian flags down to the crowds below.  The Egyptian 
commanders have been pilloried for many things in the last two and a 
half years, but for a group of people who eschew politics and maintain 
thinly veiled contempt for politicians, they are shrewd political 
operators.  After the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, under Field 
Marshal Hussein Tantawi, sullied the image of the senior officer 
corps—if not the military itself—the Ministry of Defense is in the 
strongest position it has been in since February 11, 2011.
>...The 
possibility that June 30 would end in significant bloodshed in Egypt’s 
streets—beyond the sixteen deaths and almost eight-hundred injuries—also played 
into an unarticulated strategy on the part of both 
counter-revolutionary forces embedded within the state and 
anti-Brotherhood activists to encourage the officers to reset the 
political system. Both groups believe that a military intervention would 
fulfill their specific, but diametrically opposed interests.  For those within 
the state who have been working diligently to undermine the 
Brotherhood in virtually every way, the goal is the restoration of the 
old order. For Egypt’s myriad activists who have coalesced in a profound and at 
times pathological hatred of Morsi, a “do-over” transition would surely improve 
their electoral prospects. General Abdelfattah al Sisi 
and his deputies are not so dim-witted as to fall into the trap the 
political forces have set for them, however.
Cook 
concludes his piece by writing "this morning General al Sisi is the most 
powerful man in Egypt. To rule, but not govern…" The accuracy of his 
comment is borne out by the statement Sissi issued today that brings up 
the prospect of a coup. It is simultaneously with "the people" and vague enough 
that it could justify almost any action – or inaction. 
"The armed forces reiterates its call to meet the demands of the people, and it 
gives everyone 48 hours as a last chance to carry the burden of the 
ongoing historic circumstances that the country is going through," Sissi said 
in his nationally broadcast address. "If the demands of the people are not met 
within the given period of time (the military) will be 
compelled by its national and historic responsibilities, and in respect 
for the demands of Egypt’s great people, to announce a roadmap for the 
future, and procedures that it will supervise involving the 
participation of all the factions and groups.”
The "demands" of 
"the people?" Most Egyptians demand more jobs, better living standards, 
an end to police brutality, and a more dignified life in their homeland. But 
they are from a consensus on how to meet those demands. Tens of 
millions of Egyptians continue to support Morsi and the Muslim 
Brotherhood, just as tens of millions of other Egyptians view them as 
dangerous failures. Some of these are most worried about the 
Brotherhood's desire to further Islamicize Egyptian society and public 
life; others are uncomfortable with the neo-liberal economic policies 
the Brothers favor; and still others merely want a do-over.
It's 
become a tired cliche to describe Egyptian society as "polarized," but 
some cliches are useful because they're the best way to describe the 
reality. The effect of democratic elections, and the legal chicanery 
that has followed them, has been a breakdown of social trust and further 
division of society. Opposition forces, from groups that yearn for the 
stability and heavy-handed governance of the Mubarak era to those who 
want a real democracy – not just elections, but the trimmings of civil 
society, separation of powers, and political compromise – have failed to build 
workable opposition coalitions.
That has left Egypt with 
two stark choices: The military, or Morsi. At the moment, the military 
is clearly the more palatable choice for large swaths of the protesters, who 
have been described as dangerous rabble by Morsi. He says they're 
the ones standing between the will of the people and its realization, 
not him. It's not hard to understand why he sees it that way.
The Muslim Brotherhood's offices in Cairo were overrun last night and set on 
fire by protesters. Similar attacks were carried out in other cities. Did the 
military, or the police, intervene to protect them? No.
Egypt's politics are sick, and getting sicker. And while the Morsi presidency's 
singular achievement has been to divide Egypt's people in a shockingly 
short period of time, the movement he hails from spent 80 years 
struggling for power in Egypt. That power was delivered at the ballot 
box, but now it is facing the threat of being removed from power within 
two days, unless Morsi pulls the unlikeliest rabbit out of his hat in 
the interim. What will the Muslim Brothehood rank and file do then?
The example of Algeria can't be ignored. In 1992, the Algerian military 
cancelled elections that the country's Islamic Salvation Front was set 
to win. That set the stage for a decade of civil war that claimed at 
least 150,000 Algerian lives and convinced a generation of Islamists in 
that country that peacefully participating in electoral politics was a 
foolish choice.
Sissi surely knows this history. But as hundreds of thousands of protesters 
continue to fill Egypt's streets demanding Morsi irhal ("go!") – just as they 
did with Mubarak in early 2011 – he appears to have left himself few options.

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2013/0701/Is-Egypt-s-military-about-to-overthrow-an-elected-president


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to