Hot links work at the group page.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyunderground/message/4278

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

*EGYPT IN TRANSITION


*
**

*As previously announced and expected, the Egyptian army overthrew the
regime of President Mohamed Morsi
<http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/07/20137319828176718.html>
yesterday.

*

*Since many of Egypt's top generals were trained in the USA, and the
army is funded and armed by the USA, it is difficult to believe that
there wasn't consultation by the generals with the USA before this took
place, and a nod of approval given.  The State Department never
acknowledges this, as in other regime changes during the Obama
presidency (Honduras, Paraguay), but shows by quick political support
where it stands.  This is to create the illusion of support for democracy.
*

*A heartbreaking part of this affair is that courageous female
protesters were sexually assaulted
<http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2013/07/20137312315973608.html>,
as happened in the 2011 uprising in Egypt.  That people should go into
the streets under such conditions shows the dire shape of Egypt's rule,
and bravery in opposing it.*

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*OUR SHAMEFUL, CORRUPT GOVERNMENT LEADERS DO IT AGAIN


*
**

*Our US government representatives and counterparts in other rich
nations attempted to siphon off UN funds
<http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/07/03-6> targeted for climate
change and transfer the money to transnational corporations that bribe
governments in various ways for control (in this country, campaign
financing, for example).*

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*GASPS OF A DYING EMPIRE


*
**

*Showing its lack of trust in the USA, Iraq is buying billions of
dollars in weapons from Russia
<http://english.pravda.ru/russia/economics/03-07-2013/125020-russia_iraq-0/>.
This indicates the government of Iraq wants independence from
traditional threats by the USA that "unless you do things our way we
will cut off your supply of parts for weapons systems."
*

*Bolivia is filing a complaint
<http://rt.com/news/bolivia-un-complaint-plane-601/> over the grounding
of its president's aircraft.  Imagine the outrage if Air Force One had
been forced down by any nation on earth.  As the Empire crumbles it is
becoming desperate, disregarding international law more openly than ever.
*

*And finally, Glenn Greenwald shows
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jul/03/clapper-lying-snowden-eu-bolivia>
that top officials of our government now often lie to Congress,
undermining any claim that we have a "representative government," or
republic.  More accurately, we have a National Security State
<http://luvnews.info/NatSec.htm>, under a plutocratic oligarchy, now
desperate to keep the truth from its people and their elected
representatives.*

------------------------------------------------------------------------

**Today there will be an online protest against the NSA
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/03/nsa-protest-reddit-mozilla-july-4_n_3540893.html>.
**

**Margaret Flowers asked if we would help her get the following
information out about protests and what is happening to stifle them, and
why it is important to inform more citizens about what's happening,
since so much of it is in the dark, in the Land of the Free.
**

**At /LUV News/, we never suggested that the Occupy Movement ended, we
said it just shifted into another phase.  Part of that phase is long
term, teaching our fellow citizens around the mainstream media what's
happening, and /LUV News/ has done that as a primary function since its
inception 15 years ago.
**

**But we also encourage revolution in the manner of Mark Twain's "I am
always on the side of the revolutionists, because there never was a
revolution unless there were some oppressive and intolerable conditions
against which to revolute."  --Jack Balkwill
**

*THE STATE OF DISSENT IN AMERICA: FLEX YOUR RIGHTS
<http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/17354-the-state-of-dissent-in-america-flex-your-rights>
*

*by Margaret Flowers and Kevin Zeese
*

*When we occupied Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC, during the Autumn of
2011, we often marched down Pennsylvania Avenue to Capitol Hill to
express our many grievances. We were always accompanied by a large
contingent of police officers and other members of the national security
state, some obvious and others not so much. Along the way, we would pass
the Newseum, which has the First Amendment engraved in large letters on
the front of the building. We made it a habit to pause at the Newseum
and read aloud in unison the words of the First Amendment. The reason
for doing so was to let everyone know, including the security state,
that we have the right to protest peacefully and that we were exercising
that right.*

*We live in a time when there is much to protest. The government is
dysfunctional, ruled by plutocrats who pass laws for their corporate
friends that cause real harm and suffering for the people and ecological
collapse of the planet. Many activists with whom we work recognize that
the traditional tools used to effect change within the system -
petitions, lobbying, electing supportive legislators or running for
office - largely fail in the current political environment.*

*Our most effective option is strategic and militant, nonviolent protest
<http://www.popularresistance.org/history-teaches-that-we-have-the-power-to-transform-the-nation-heres-how/>
in all of its many forms, from boycotts to rallies to hunger strikes.
And it is our First Amendment right to use these tools. But rather than
respecting and supporting our right to peaceably assemble and petition
the government for a redress of our grievances, the national security
state and legislators are chipping away at our rights in more extreme
ways than ever before.*

*Even our right to know what is being done in our name is disappearing.
The White House and Congress are doing more in secret and are cracking
down on those who reveal their actions. Whistleblowers are being charged
under the Espionage Act and journalists are being spied upon.*

*It is up to the people to preserve our rights to dissent and to know
the truth. Otherwise, they will continue to slip away. Every day in the
US, people are taking action to hold onto these rights and they are
inspiring others to do the same.*

**The Vague Definition of Crime**

*During the occupation of Freedom Plaza in 2011, we sometimes joked with
law enforcement that the Rule of Law only applied to the 99%, not the
1%. The police knew this was more a truth than it was a joke.  Bankers
who commit fraud and those who crashed the economy are simply fined and
not prosecuted at all
<http://www.soundbitenewsservice.com/fmtrss.php?id=299-1>. Health
insurance and pharmaceutical corporations
<http://www.pnhp.org/news/2011/june/disturbing-new-statistics-show-huge-percentage-of-financial-fraud-against-us-governme>
are regularly fined for fraudulent behavior, more than any other
industry. To most large corporations, these fines are simply a cost of
doing business
<http://beta.fool.com/kprogers/2012/08/04/bank-fines-cost-doing-business/8586/>
and wind up costing much less than what the fraudulent behavior reaps in
profits.*

*Corporate executives are not even held accountable when their business
practices result in massive deaths. An example is Warren Anderson
<http://www.popularresistance.org/petition-us-must-extradite-indias-osama-bin-laden/>,
the former chair of Union Carbide during the Bhopal chemical disaster
that poisoned over 500,000 people and killed thousands. He skipped bail
in India and fled to the US. And he has not been returned despite
warrants for his arrest issued by India.*

*On the flip-side, the Obama administration has been conducting a war on
dissent.
<http://www.popularresistance.org/justice-american-style-the-obama-war-on-dissent/>
It appears that the security state can turn almost any behavior into a
crime if a person is not a member of the elite. In fact, just a few days
ago on June 27, a health care activist
<http://www.popularresistance.org/pennsylvania-activist-arrested-for-writing-pro-health-care-message-in-chalk/>
was arrested for writing a chalk message on a sidewalk during a protest
against the governor for not expanding Medicaid to more Pennsylvanians
under the federal health law. The charge was disorderly conduct for
writing "a derogatory remark about the governor on the sidewalk." The
remark: "Corbett has health care, we should too."*

*Since the Occupy movement rose up in 2011, a number of laws have been
passed that are written vaguely and increase the power of the security
state. In early 2012, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
passed by Congress contained a provision that loosened the definition of
a "terrorist" to include anyone who has contact with Al Qaeda or an
"associated organization," and allowed indefinite detention without
trial and extraordinary rendition of US citizens.*

*Around the same time, Occupy London was placed on the terrorist watch
list
<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/19/1047077/-Occupy-Movement-Placed-on-Terrorist-Watch-List-by-London-Police>
by the London Police. And it was later learned, after a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request was granted, that the FBI was monitoring
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/23/fbi-occupy-wall-street_n_2355883.html>
the Occupy movement in the US and in some papers referred to Occupy
protests as "domestic terrorism."*

*In fact, spying and infiltration were widespread in the Occupy
movement. We wrote about it in a two-part series
<http://www.popularresistance.org/partiinfiltrationtodisruptdivideandmis-directarewidespreadinoccupy/>.
The second article focused on how infiltration has been the norm
<http://www.popularresistance.org/partiiinfiltrationofpoliticalmovementsisthenormnottheexceptionintheunitedstates/>
in US political movements for the last 100 years.  Undercover police
were exposed for their infiltration of Occupy in Chicago
<http://www.popularresistance.org/undercover-officer-connected-to-nato-5-case-still-spying/>
and Austin
<http://www.popularresistance.org/occupy-austin-police-disclosure-packet-of-undercover-infiltration-and-manipulation/>,
no doubt two instances among many. FOIA requests documented FBI
<http://www.popularresistance.org/fbisurveillanceofoccupywallstreetdetailed/>
surveillance and infiltration, their entrapment strategy
<http://www.popularresistance.org/bountyhuntersandchildpredatorsinsidethefbientrapmentstrategy/>,
and how the FBI coordinated the crackdown
<http://www.popularresistance.org/revealedhowthefbicoordinatedthecrackdownonoccupy/>
with local police, including, we discovered
<http://www.popularresistance.org/arecitiesworkingtogethertoendoccupymovement/>,
  conference calls with mayors and police chiefs
<http://www.popularresistance.org/moreonpolicedepartmentscollusionindefenseof1whostheorganizationcoordinatingthosecrackdowncalls/>.
Sometimes the closing down of encampments involved brutal police action
<http://www.popularresistance.org/footageofnypdsbrutalraidthatended2-monthoccupationofzuccottiparkreleased/>.
Often journalists were targeted
<http://www.popularresistance.org/oneyearofoccupyoneyearofjournalistarrests/>
as were even nurses and health care volunteers
<http://www.popularresistance.org/nursescondemnchicagomayoremmanuelforarrestofnursesmedicalaidvolunteersatoccupychicago/>.
*

*The involvement of national security agencies was broad. FOIA documents
<http://www.popularresistance.org/freedomofinformationactdocumentsshowmassivenationwidemonitoringofoccupymovementbyhomelandsecurity/>
released to the Partnership for Civil Justice Foundation found that in
addition to the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal
Protective Service
<http://www.popularresistance.org/homeland-security-kept-tabs-on-occupy-protesters-report/>
were involved in nationwide monitoring of Occupy and central to the
nationwide crackdown
<http://www.popularresistance.org/newlydiscoveredhomelandsecurityfilesshowfedscentraltooccupycrackdown/>.
Other documents show that the National Park Police
<http://www.popularresistance.org/documents-reveal-spying-on-occupy-national-gathering-in-philadelphia/>
were doing the same. (The CIA has so far refused to search its files
<http://www.popularresistance.org/istheciainvolvedinthecrackdownoftheoccupymovement/>
in response to a FOIA request.) A report by law schools
<http://www.popularresistance.org/nypdconsistentlyviolatedbasicrightsduringoccupyprotestsstudy/>
documented how the rights of occupiers were routinely violated. And a
report covering many of these issues, "Dissent or Terror
<http://www.popularresistance.org/dissent-or-terror-new-report-on-monitoring-of-occupy-movement/>,"
shows how counter-terrorism tools like fusion centers also worked with
corporations to attack the Occupy Movement.*

*Now we're seeing the same kind of tactics used against climate justice
protesters. Ranchers who oppose the KXL pipeline
<http://www.popularresistance.org/transcanada-calls-nebraska-ranchers-agressive-and-abusive-talks-of-terrorism/>
for tar sands are being classified as terrorists, although
aggressivetargeting of environmentalists
<http://www.popularresistance.org/corporate-and-law-enforcement-spying-on-environmentalists/>
is not new.*

*Chris Hedges and a few colleagues are suing the Obama administration
<http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_ndaa_and_the_death_of_the_democratic_state_20130211/>
because a section of the 2012 NDAA could be interpreted to incriminate
journalists who speak to members of Al Qaeda or other groups determined
to be terrorists. In the initial case, Judge Katherine Forrest ruled
that this NDAA section was unconstitutional
<http://www.popularresistance.org/judgeblockscontroversialndaa/>. She
placed a permanent injunction on the provision on a Friday afternoon
last September, and Hedges' lawyer was immediately notified that the
decision would be appealed by the Obama administration. The emergency
appeal
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/us/politics/us-warns-judges-ruling-impedes-its-detention-powers.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0>
occurred first thing on the following Monday morning. The stay was
lifted
<http://www.popularresistance.org/appealscourtjudgereinstatesindefinitedetentionfornow/>
and the Supreme Court refused an
<http://www.popularresistance.org/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-lift-stay-on-ndaa-injunction-allows-law-to-go-forward/>
interim appeal.*

*Hedges explains
<http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_ndaa_and_the_death_of_the_democratic_state_20130211/>
that the administration's appeal was sought on an emergency basis
because it is already secretly using this NDAA provision and didn't want
to be held in contempt of court. The case is ongoing and Hedges expects
that it will ultimately be heard before the Supreme Court. He writes
that if we lose this struggle, the situation will be much more serious:
"Once the state seizes this unchecked power, it will inevitably create a
secret, lawless world of indiscriminate violence, terror and gulags. I
lived under several military dictatorships during the two decades I was
a foreign correspondent. I know the beast."*

*Another law
<http://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/ready-occupy-what-you-need-know-about-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-law>
passed in 2012, the anti-Occupy Law
<http://www.popularresistance.org/anti-occupylawonlyawaitspresidentssignature/>,
made it a more serious charge to protest in an area where a person is
under the protection of the Secret Service or in a National Security
Special Event. Ray McGovern, former CIA officer who gave the morning
intelligence briefings to multiple presidents, says it is no coincidence
that these laws were passed after the Occupy movement began. Congress
members were concerned that in a mass uprising, the police may not
protect them.*

*There are other signs that the security state is taking more steps to
empower itself in the case of a mass uprising. The Pentagon
<http://www.popularresistance.org/u-s-military-power-grab-goes-into-effect/>
recently gave itself the authority to respond to civil disturbances
without even coordinating with local police. The national security state
is also making arrangements
<http://www.popularresistance.org/pentagon-bracing-for-public-dissent-over-climate-and-energy-shocks/>
with other nations in the case that domestic uprisings overwhelm the
police and military and outside assistance is necessary.*

*Kevin Gosztola, who writes the blog "The Dissenter
<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/>" on FireDogLake.com, has been
following the activity of the national security state, including the
case of three activists who traveled to Chicago for the NATO protests in
May 2012. They were infiltrated by undercover police and arrested
pre-emptively
<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/01/25/illinois-state-terrorism-laws-constitutionality-challenged-by-lawyers-for-nato-3/>
the day before the NATO protest. They are the first people to be charged
under the state terrorism law passed in Illinois after 9/11.*

*Gosztola states
<http://www.mixcloud.com/ClearingtheFOG/the-state-of-dissent-in-the-us-with-kevin-gosztola-and-tarak-kauff/>
that the pre-emptive arrests were meant to intimidate activists from
expressing their First Amendment rights, and that it is not unusual for
police to use statements that are taken out of context and pieced
together from multiple conversations in their affidavits. Further,
Gosztola writes
<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/01/25/illinois-state-terrorism-laws-constitutionality-challenged-by-lawyers-for-nato-3/>
that the law was written vaguely to give law enforcement "incredible
latitude to go after people even if they only have a minor suspicion
that those people could engage in terrorism." He adds, "Coupled with the
fact that law enforcement is using infiltrators or informants to push
mentally unstable people, impoverished individuals or activists militant
in their political beliefs to commit terrorist acts, it is easy for
government to concoct terror cases that can be prosecuted." Terrorism
rhetoric was recently used to turn pacifists into terrorists
<http://www.popularresistance.org/how-the-us-turned-3-pacifists-into-violent-terrorists/>.*

*Infiltration, spying and pre-emptive arrests are all tools used by the
security state to squash dissent. In some cases they work to stifle
First Amendment activity, but with unexpected consequences. Since 9/11,
Muslims
<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/05/14/what-law-what-process-for-muslims-in-america/>
have been targeted by the FBI and other agencies. This has created a
culture of fear and the knowledge that their rights don't exist. Many
Muslims are afraid to attend rallies, participate in religious
activities or donate to charities.*

*This injustice to the Muslim community and the increasing reach of the
security state affect all of us. They are affronts to our constitutional
rights. Whether a person engages in activism or not, the rights to free
speech and to dissent are foundations of democracy. The current
political system is hurting all of us and disruption of its activities
is necessary to force changes that will shift the present environmental
and economic course. The real struggle for freedom is occurring right
here within the United States.*

**Crackdown on Whistleblowers and the Media**

*President Obama's administration is acting in unprecedented ways to
stifle our right to know what our country is doing. Its attacks on
whistleblowers and the press are creating a culture of fear to force
compliance, facilitated by economic insecurity and high unemployment. At
some point, this will backfire.*

*Throughout history, whistleblowers like Daniel Ellsberg
<http://www.ellsberg.net/> and Karen Silkwood
<http://www.legacy.com/ns/news-story.aspx?t=the-mysterious-death-of-karen-silkwood&id=162>,
who died mysteriously, have taken great personal risk to let the public
know about lies, corruption and threats to public health and safety by
government and corporations. Whistleblowers usually act out of a moral
conscience and sense of responsibility to the public. Previously, leaks
by whistleblowers led to government investigations such as "Watergate"
and the Enron scandal.*

*However, since President Obama's first inauguration, whistleblowers who
act in the public interest are more likely to be intimidated, retaliated
against and charged with crimes. Under Obama, the Espionage Act
<http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/6-brave-govt-whistleblowers-charged-under-espionage-act-obamas-administration?page=0%2C1>
has been used against seven whistleblowers from Thomas Drake to Bradley
Manning, and most recently, Edward Snowden. Prior to Obama, the
Espionage Act had only been used three times in total.*

*Many recent whistleblowers tried to raise their concerns through
internal channels before going public with information, e.g., Thomas
Drake and his colleagues tried for seven months to work inside
<http://www.popularresistance.org/3-nsa-veterans-speak-out-on-whistle-blower-we-told-you-so/>
the NSA, Congress and courts but got nowhere. But rather than protecting
the rights of whistleblowers, it is more likely that this approach will
result in retaliation. The Government Accountability Project
<http://www.whistleblower.org/press/press-release-archive/2013/2803--gap-statement-on-the-espionage-charge-filed-against-edward-snowden->,
which protects the rights of government whistleblowers, states that this
is especially true for those in the intelligence community.*

*The Obama administration has taken the culture of "see something, say
something" into government agencies, but not in a way that prevents
fraud and corruption. Government employees are now required to report
any colleagues who behave as if they may leak information and managers
can be held responsible if they do not report "suspicious activity."
This is the "Insider Threat
<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/06/21/obamas-insider-threat-program-discourages-whistleblowing-treats-leaking-as-aiding-the-enemy/>"
program that treats leakers as spies who are aiding the enemy and
extends all of the way down to those in the Peace Corps. There is even a
course on the USDA website called "Treason 101
<http://www.dm.usda.gov/ocpm/Security%20Guide/Treason/Intro.htm>."*

*In this new culture of treating whistleblowers as enemies of the state,
whistleblowers either need to leave the country entirely or remain
anonymous in order to protect themselves. And, much to their own
detriment, the mass media is complicit
<http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2013/06/11/medias-contempt-inability-to-comprehend-what-it-means-to-be-a-whistleblower/>
in promoting the idea of whistleblowers as unpatriotic. The Snowden case
served as a prime example
<http://www.popularresistance.org/demonizing-edward-snowden-which-side-are-you-on/>
of indicating who in the media is a mouthpiece for the state and who
represents the interests of the public.*

*Gosztola of the Dissenter criticizes the media
<http://clearingthefogradio.org/monday-june-24-the-first-amendment-right-to-dissent-peacefully/>
who simply parrot official government statements rather than standing up
to the government and questioning their behavior. The mass media have
become so dominated by corporate power and ambition that they no longer
question authority. Gosztola reminds the media that particularly in
times of public dissent, their role is to question officials about
issues that the public protests.*

*Glenn Greenwald, reflecting on four weeks in the middle of the NSA
surveillance leak storm
<http://www.popularresistance.org/video-greenwald-speaks-out-for-all-of-us/>,
notes how people in the corporate mass media express pride that they ask
the government for permission before they publish documents; and how
they are more than happy to publish leaks the government wants in the
public. These acts demonstrate the media working for the government, not
for the public interest.*

*Already, the mass media's failure to understand the relevance of
attacks by the national security state on another media outlet,
Wikileaks, is coming back to bite them. The mass media refused to view
Wikileaks as a legitimate media outlet
<http://www.independentaustralia.net/2011/business/media-2/investigation-mainstream-media-coverage-of-wikileaks-has-fallen-far-short/>
and "went so far as to interpret the leaks as revealing desirable traits
of US foreign policy making." When Wikileaks was under attack by the US
government, which blocked its bank accounts, destroyed the reputation of
Julian Assange and threatened litigation, including a Grand Jury
investigation of people associated with Wikileaks, the mass media went
along with the attacks.*

*Now, the mass media in the US is starting to see that the national
security state is not their friend. Recently Associated Press had its
phone logs seized
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/18/ap-phone-records-seizure-government-_n_3298608.html>
under the order of the Department of Justice and a top Washington
reporter for Fox News, James Rosen
<http://articles.latimes.com/2013/may/20/nation/la-na-fbi-reporter-20130521>,
was followed and had personal emails seized by the FBI. Media outlets
that are not compliant with the state risk consequences. Just this past
week it was reported that the US Army blocked The Guardian
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/28/us-army-blocks-guardian-website-access>
on all of its networks.*

*The Obama administration is going to extremes to suppress information.
All of these actions against whistleblowers and the media are attempts
to maintain secrecy so the government can hide its crimes
<http://rt.com/op-edge/snowden-nsa-crime-gchq-136/>. At some level,
though, the more the government cracks down, the more there are
individuals who have the courage to push back and report the truth or
blow the whistle. As Snowden said in responding to questions
<http://www.popularresistance.org/edward-snowden-q-and-a-nsa-whistleblower-answers-your-questions/>
on The Guardian:*

*"Binney, Drake, Kiriakou and Manning are all examples of how overly
harsh responses to public-interest whistleblowing only escalate the
scale, scope and skill involved in future disclosures. Citizens with a
conscience are not going to ignore wrongdoing simply because they'll be
destroyed for it: the conscience forbids it. Instead, these draconian
responses simply build better whistleblowers. If the Obama
administration responds with an even harsher hand against me, they can
be assured that they'll soon find themselves facing an equally harsh
public response."*

*Assange made a similar point
<http://www.popularresistance.org/on-1-year-snowden-manning-and-more/>
in a recent column on Wikileaks: "This isn't a phenomenon that is going
away. This is inevitable. And by trying to crush these young
whistleblowers with espionage charges, the US government is taking on a
generation, and that is a battle it is going to lose."*

**Flexing Our Rights**

*Rights are like muscles; they only increase when they are used. To
avoid further atrophy, many people are taking steps to preserve the
First Amendment.*

*For example, as more people see the mass media for what it is, a
mouthpiece for the plutocrats, independent and citizen media are rising
to take its place. Independent media outlets are also working to fund
more investigative reporting. And through social media, every person can
now easily blog and share photos and videos of events. Groups such as
the Electronic Frontier Foundation <https://www.eff.org/> are fighting
to preserve internet rights, which are essential to an independent media.*

*We should also encourage members of the mass media to challenge power
and support them when they do. Greenwald said he was deeply inspired by
Snowden's courage
<http://www.popularresistance.org/video-greenwald-speaks-out-for-all-of-us/>
and believes it will inspire others. Longtime White House correspondent
Helen Thomas was a tremendous example of a reporter who asked tough
questions. More reporters like her are necessary for a functioning
democracy.*

*There are also efforts to protect whistleblowers. The Government
Accountability Project <http://www.whistleblower.org/> has taken up many
prominent cases and was successful in defending Thomas Drake. Bradley
Manning, who is on trial at present, is supported by the Bradley Manning
Support Network <http://www.bradleymanning.org/>, [Disclaimer: Kevin
Zeese serves on the steering committee] which has raised hundreds of
thousands of dollars for his defense attorneys. Many volunteers attend
his hearings wearing T-shirts that have the word "Truth" printed on them
so Manning can see he is not alone. And volunteers are present at the
trial to transcribe the proceedings, sketch courtroom scenes and hold
rallies for Manning at the gates to Fort Meade
<http://www.popularresistance.org/two-thousand-rally-for-bradley-manning-at-ft-meade/>,
where the trial is taking place.*

*The reaction to the NSA leaks has built opposition to government
surveillance. Already over 500,000 people
<http://www.popularresistance.org/500000-sign-on-to-stop-watching-us/>
have joined an effort to stop the spying at www.StopWatching.US
<http://www.stopwatching.us/>, and more than 100 organizations
<http://www.popularresistance.org/over-100-organizations-protest-nsa-spying-demand-investigation/>
have signed onto a letter calling for a Congressional investigation
modeled on the Church Committee of the mid-70s.*

*And resistance is still strong in the United States. We document this
everyday on PopularResistance.org <http://www.popularresistance.org/>.
People are rising up to protect their rights to jobs at a living wage,
affordable education, health care, housing, a clean environment and
more. These are all important because not only do they expose the
problems in our country, but they also inspire others
<http://www.countercurrents.org/flowers180513.htm> to take action.*

*Some groups are using the courts to protect our rights, as Chris Hedges
is doing to stop indefinite detention in the NDAA. Groups like the
National Lawyers Guild, EFF, American Civil Liberties Union and
Partnership for Civil Justice have filed suits on these issues or on
behalf of protesters who have had their rights violated.*

*Members of Veterans for Peace and others are going on trial for a First
Amendment event <http://www.stopthesewars.org/> [Disclaimer: Margaret
Flowers is a defendant in the case]. The action last October was
designed as a "Paradox Protest," which places the protesters in a
win-win situation and those in power in a lose-lose position. Tarak
Kauff of the Veterans for Peace Action Network described the action
<http://clearingthefogradio.org/monday-june-24-the-first-amendment-right-to-dissent-peacefully/>
on our program, "Clearing the FOG Radio."*

*The action stemmed from the arrest of Veterans in the Vietnam Veterans'
Memorial Plaza in downtown New York City on May Day, 2012. Occupy Wall
Street protesters marched to the plaza and planned to hold a general
assembly there. Kauff describes the assembly as exactly what one would
want to see in a democracy: people engaging in peaceful direct democracy
in public. However, the response of the NYPD was to enforce a 10 PM
curfew and order the crowd to disperse. The Veterans Peace Team was
present and decided to remain in the plaza because the curfew was being
enforced selectively, and they were arrested.*

*The Paradox Action occurred on October 7 on the 11th anniversary of the
invasion of Afghanistan. Veterans and their allies held a ceremony at
the Vietnam Veterans' Memorial to make visible the human and
environmental cost of war. There were speakers and musicians followed by
a solemn reading of the names of New Yorkers who died in Vietnam, Iraq
and Afghanistan as flowers were placed in 11 vases.*

*At 10 PM, the NYPD showed up en masse to shut down the peaceful
protest. Kauff spoke with the officers and explained that the ceremony
was peaceful and respectful, that we had the right to honor those who
died in war and that for veterans, war memories don't conveniently shut
down at 10 PM. Kauff was told by the police that "We don't want to set
an example for the Occupy movement [by allowing you to stay past the
curfew]." Twenty-five veterans and allies were arrested for standing up
for the Right to Assemble.*

*The trial will take place in New York City on July 8 through 10. It is
seen as an important precedent to set in defense of the First Amendment
because the curfew in the plaza is only enforced when groups assemble
there to exercise their rights. Some of the defendants will refuse a
guilty plea and if found guilty will not pay a fine or accept community
service as a punishment. If the case is lost, it will be appealed.*

*Kauff, who is on a solidarity hunger strike with the prisoners in
Guantanamo Bay, states
<http://www.popularresistance.org/why-i-am-on-hunger-strike-in-solidarity-with-guantanamo-prisoners/>,
"If people do not take a stand and resist publicly, the country will
continue its slide into totalitarianism. The horror of Guantanamo is an
example of what the country is becoming and why we must stand up for our
rights. We will not accept punishment. We will not admit wrongdoing."*

**Building Democracy at Home**

*Not everyone has the ability to take the risks involved in resistance
actions to protect our rights, but everyone can support those who do. It
is important to understand that the political process is dysfunctional
and the country is sliding in a direction that hurts all of us. The
tools that were traditionally used to effect change from the inside are
no longer sufficient. Strategic resistance
<http://www.popularresistance.org/history-teaches-that-we-have-the-power-to-transform-the-nation-heres-how/>
is a necessary tool to build real democracy within the United States.*

*As we have seen, the security state will go to great lengths to
suppress real dissent. It will use infiltration, intimidation, spying,
the courts and even violence to stop those who stand up for our rights
and for truth. Through the mass media, the security state will use
distraction and personal attacks to keep the focus off
<http://www.popularresistance.org/i-knew-snowden-and-hes-not-the-story/>
of the real issues.*

*At a time like this, solidarity is important. There is strength in
unity. It will take a mass movement
<http://www.popularresistance.org/history-teaches-that-we-have-the-power-to-transform-the-nation-heres-how/>
in the US to stop policies that harm people and the planet, further
entrench corporate power and invade every aspect of our lives. We see
this currently in countries like Turkey, Brazil and Egypt. In Brazil,
the protests are actually working to force concessions by the
government, partly because they have a more functional democracy.*

*In Brazil, it was an increase in bus fares that ignited a mass
movement. In Turkey, it was the development of a public park. We cannot
predict what will spark great unrest
<http://www.popularresistance.org/popular-resistance-newsletter-the-inevitable-and-unpredictable-mass-movement/>
in the United States or when it will happen, but the conditions are ripe
for it. And when it does occur, we are all going to need to exercise our
rights, and if they are abused, use that abuse to expand the movement
for real democracy.*

*/You can listen to The First Amendment Right to Dissent with Kevin
Gosztola and Tarak Kauff on Clearing The FOG
<http://clearingthefogradio.org/monday-june-24-the-first-amendment-right-to-dissent-peacefully/>./*

*Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission of the
author.
<http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/17354-the-state-of-dissent-in-america-flex-your-rights>*


**
------------------------------------------------------------------------

**
*To join the Liberty Underground news service go here:
http://luvnews.info/Join.htm*
**
*You may also join our talk group
athttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/>if you would like
to participate
*
**or join our Facebook group here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461619557192964/
*
email: [email protected]*
**
*Tell your friends about /LUV News/ because some people just don't get it*




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to