Dusten Brown reads a book to daughter Veronica Brown, 3, at their Nowata, 
Oklahoma home.

The Gloves Come Off: Civil Rights Suit Filed as Adoption of Veronica Finalized
Suzette Brewer
August 01, 2013
Before the adoption of Veronica Brown to Matt and Melanie Capobianco was 
finalized yesterday in a South Carolina courtroom, the Native American 
Rights Fund made good on its promised Civil Rights litigation, filing a 
complaint late Tuesday night in federal district court on behalf of the 
girl's right to due process in a “meaningful hearing” to determine her 
best interest. The courts in South Carolina failed to “take into account or 
require any inquiry” regarding Veronica's current circumstances 
before approving the transition plan provided by Matt and Melanie 
Capobianco of James Island.
RELATED: Baby Veronica Must Return to Adoptive Parents
Supreme Court Thwarts ICWA Intent in Baby Veronica Case
Anger Erupts Across Indian Country Over Baby Veronica Ruling
Native American Rights Fund: Stop the Forced Removal of Baby Veronica
Additionally, the suit (V.B. v. Daniel E. Martin, Family Court for the Ninth 
Judicial Circuit) declares that Veronica is a tribal member and remains an 
“Indian Child” under the Indian Child Welfare Act, and therefore she “possesses 
a 
federally protected right” to a best interest hearing under federal law.
Supported by dozens of tribes, civil rights and child welfare groups, adoption 
advocacy organizations, legal authorities and Native American 
groups, the complaint seeks federal jurisdiction over the case, as well 
as an injunction prohibiting South Carolina courts from further 
proceedings pending a full and “meaningful” best interest hearing.
Angel Smith, an Oklahoma attorney appointed by the Cherokee Nation to represent 
Veronica as a tribal member, filed the motion on the girl's 
behalf.
The Cherokee Nation reacted swiftly to the finalization of the adoption and 
transition plan in South Carolina.
“Today, a Family Court in South Carolina finalized the adoption of an almost 
4-year-old Cherokee child who has been living with her 
unquestionably fit, loving, biological father and large extended family, for 
one year and seven months, half a continent away in Oklahoma and 
Cherokee Nation,” said Chrissi Nimmo, assistant attorney general for the 
Cherokee Nation. “This decision was made without a hearing to determine what is 
in Veronica’s current best interests and comes almost two years after the same 
Family Court found that Dusten Brown was a fit, loving 
parent and it would be in Veronica’s best interests to be placed with 
her father. Every parent in America should be terrified.
Dusten Brown is an honorable man and a good father. Cherokee Nation 
will continue to support Dusten, Veronica and the entire Brown family in their 
attempt to keep their family whole.”
Dusten Brown, who is currently in training with the National Guard, also issued 
the following statement:
“Our family is shocked and deeply saddened that the South Carolina 
Supreme Court has refused to allow Veronica's best interest to be 
considered. Even worse, that Court issued an order they acknowledge will cause 
my daughter to suffer harm. The Court gave its blessing to the 
transition plan offered by the Capobiancos that says upon transfer to 
them, Veronica will be 'fearful, scared, anxious, confused,'” said 
Brown.
“They say she will likely become quiet and withdrawn and may cry 
herself to sleep. That the transfer will cause 'grief' and 'loss' and 
she will feel 'rejected' by me and her family. They say it will leave 
her with many 'unanswered questions.' I will not voluntarily let my 
child go through that, no parent would. I am her father and it is my job to 
protect her. My family and I continue to pray that the justice 
system bring justice to Veronica.”
RELATED: Inseparable Sisters: Adoption Order Exacts Toll on Baby Veronica's 
Family
But legal experts acknowledged that the fight over custody of 
Veronica is not only not over, but has now moved into a whole new level 
of litigation. In spite of South Carolina's ruling yesterday, 
enforcement in Oklahoma courts will now be the focus of the case.
“Everything will now move to Washington County, Oklahoma, where 
Veronica now resides,” said a legal scholar who asked for anonymity 
because of the ongoing litigation. “But it will require a bit of time 
for any order to be domesticated in that state. You may have an order 
from South Carolina, but guess what? Veronica's not in South Carolina. 
She's been domiciled in Oklahoma for 19 months and there's no way a 
court in Oklahoma is going to approve enforcement of this order without a 
normal, legal checklist of things that would be required for any other 
child up that's been put up for adoption, not to mention a child who is a 
tribal member and is living with a biological parent.”
For example, the adoption was finalized without a current homestudy 
or psychological evaluation of any of the parties involved, which legal 
and child welfare experts say are standard operating procedures.
“It's called giving 'full faith and credit' to another state's 
order,” said the expert. “[The legal team] is going to go into court to 
argue that full faith and credit should not be given to the South 
Carolina order because the courts there did not follow the law. And 
Oklahoma, quite frankly, does not have to give full faith and credit if 
Veronica's constitutional right to due process has been denied.”
Additionally, observers say that because jurisdiction has been 
shifted to Oklahoma, the gloves have now come off in a state that was 
originally founded as “Indian Territory.” With nearly 40 tribes, 
including the Cherokee Nation, Oklahoma has the second largest American 
Indian population in the United States. And they have watched the events in 
Adoptive Couple unfold in South Carolina with growing alarm and disgust.
“How is it that Paul Clement, who wasn't even a party in this case, 
walks into the United States Supreme Court and insults every Indian 
tribe in the country by making this case about blood quantum and 
fiercely advocating for a 'best interest' hearing, only to have it shot 
down in South Carolina because the judges there think it's too hard?” 
asks one Tulsa lawyer who works exclusively in ICWA cases. “It simply 
boggles the mind that any court would callously disregard the most 
important party in this case: Veronica herself. The fight is definitely 
not over.”
Lori Alvino McGill, the attorney for birth mother Christy Maldonado, 
today dismissed the federal suit to stop the finalization of the 
adoption as a “publicity stunt,” as tribes across the country continue 
to unify in support of Veronica and the Indian Child Welfare Act.
RELATED: Baby Veronica's Mother Finally Speaks Out About Court Case
Baby Veronica's Birth Mother Files Suit, Claims ICWA Unconstitutional 
Meanwhile, on Tuesday the Capobiancos filed their response to Dusten 
Brown's request to the U.S. Supreme Court that the South Carolina courts 
postpone finalization of the adoption until a best interest 
determination hearing could be held. Chief Justice John Roberts, an 
adoptive parent himself who sided with the majority against Brown, 
oversees emergency petitions for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, 
which includes South Carolina.
Sources in Washington have pointed out that Alvino McGill's role in Adoptive 
Couple is more than that of a spokesperson for Christy Maldonado. As it turns 
out, Chief Justice Roberts and former solicitor general Ted Olson, both 
of whom sided with the Capobiancos, attended Ms. Alvino McGill's 2006 
wedding to Matthew McGill who, coincidentally, was a clerk for John 
Roberts in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Therefore, given the cozy 
nature and small world influence in the Capitol's legal circles, 
observers say it was no surprise when Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl was granted 
petition of certiorari in January.
“Dusten Brown never had a chance,” said the source. “His biggest sin 
was that he got on the wrong side of the billion dollar U.S. adoption 
industry and he was winning. [The Supreme Court] knew this when they 
took cert on this case, otherwise, why would they bother with a custody 
dispute that should have been nipped in the bud four years ago? And the 
sad part is that he's rehabilitated himself in every way in this case. 
He's gone to every length to keep his child, he's done everything asked 
of him. But it is a system that was stacked against him from the 
beginning. This is Worcester v. Georgia all over again.”
After the South Carolina court's ruling finalizing the adoption of 
his daughter, Dusten Brown made a direct plea to the Capobiancos.
“To Matt and Melanie Capobianco I want to say this: Please, for 
Veronica's sake, just stop. Stop, and ask yourself if you really believe this 
is best for her.”

Read more at 
http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/08/01/gloves-come-civil-rights-suit-filed-adoption-veronica-finalized-150676

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to