Cryptome new public key <http://cryptome.org/#Cryptome PK>.

*2013-0942.htm <http://cryptome.org/2013/08/nsa-x-keyscore-servers.htm>
        NSA X-KEYSCORE Server Sites                             August
2, 2013**2013-0941.htm <http://cryptome.org/2013/08/fbi-hackers.htm>
      FBI Adopts Hacker Tactics for Spying             August 2,
2013**2013-0940.pdf <http://cryptome.org/2013/08/nsa-culture.pdf>
   NSA Culture, 1980s to the 21st Century           August 2, 2013*



Shut Down CyberCommand — US CyberCommander Keith Alexander Doesn’t Think
It’s 
Important<http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/08/02/shut-down-cybercommand-us-cybercommander-keith-alexander-doesnt-think-its-important/>
By: emptywheel <http://www.emptywheel.net/author/emptywheel/> Friday August
2, 2013 9:36 pm

Back on March 12 — in the same hearing where he lied to Ron Wyden about
whether the intelligence community collects data on millions of Americans —
James Clapper also
implied<http://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Intelligence%20Reports/WWTA%20Remarks%20as%20delivered%2012%20Mar%202013.pdf>
that
“cyber” was the biggest threat to the United States.

So when it comes to the distinct threat areas, our statement this year
leads with cyber. And it’s hard to overemphasize its significance.
Increasingly, state and non-state actors are gaining and using cyber
expertise. They apply cyber techniques and capabilities to achieve
strategic objectives by gathering sensitive information from public- and
private sector entities, controlling the content and flow of information,
and challenging perceived adversaries in cyberspace.

That was the big
takeaway<http://ivn.us/2013/03/15/cyber-security-not-terrorism-number-one-threat-to-national-security/>
from
Clapper’s Worldwide Threat Assessment. Not that he had lied to Wyden, but
that that cyber had become a bigger threat than terrorism.

How strange, then, that the US CyberCommander (and Director of National
Security) Keith Alexander
mentioned<http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/speeches_testimonies/Transcript_of_GEN_Alexanders_Black_Hat_Speech_31_July_2013.pdf>
cyber
threats just once when he
keynoted<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvVIZ4OyGnQ&feature=youtu.be>
BlackHat
the other day.

But this information and the way our country has put it together is
something that we should also put forward as an example for the rest of the
world, because what comes out is we’re collecting everything. That is not
true. What we’re doing is for foreign intelligence purposes to go after
counterterrorism, counterproliferation, *cyberattacks*. And it’s focused.
[my emphasis]

That was it.

The sole mention of the threat his boss had suggested was the biggest
threat to the US less than 5 months earlier. “Counterterrorism,
counterproliferation, cyberattacks. and it’s focused.”

The sole mention of the threat that his audience of computer security
professionals are uniquely qualified to help with.

Compare that to his 27 mentions of “terror” (one — the one with the
question mark — may have been a mistranscription):

terrorists … terrorism … terrorist attacks … counterterrorism …
counterterrorism … terrorists … counterterrorism … terrorist organizations
… terrorist activities … terrorist … terrorist activities …
counterterrorism nexus … terrorist actor … terrorist? … terrorism …
terrorist … terrorists … imminent terrorist attack … terrorist …
terrorist-related actor … another terrorist … terrorist-related activities
… terrorist activities … stopping terrorism … future terrorist attacks …
terrorist plots … terrorist associations

That was the speech the US CyberCommander chose to deliver to one of the
premiere group of cybersecurity professionals in the world.

Terror terror terror.

Sitting among you are people who mean us harm

… US CyberCommander Alexander also said.

Apparently, Alexander and Clapper’s previous intense
focus<http://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Intelligence%20Reports/2013%20ATA%20SFR%20for%20SSCI%2012%20Mar%202013.pdf>
on
stopping hacktavists and cyberattacks and cybertheft and cyber espionage
have all been preempted by the necessity of scaring people into accepting
the various dragnets that NSA has deployed against Americans.

Which, I guess, shows us the true seriousness of the cyber threat.

To be fair to our CyberCommander, he told a slightly different story back
on June 27, when he
addressed<http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/speeches_testimonies/Transcript_of_GEN_Alexanders_AFCEA_Keynote_Speech_27_June_2013.pdf>
 the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics
Association<http://www.afcea.org/about/> International
Cyber Symposium.

Sure, he started by addressing Edwards Snowden’s leaks.

But then he talked about a debate he was prepared to have.

I do think it’s important to put that on the table, because as we go into
cyber and look at–for cyber in the future, *we’ve got to have this debate
with our country*. How are we going to protect the nation in cyberspace?
And I think this is a debate that is going to have all the key elements of
the executive branch–that’s DHS, FBI, DOD, Cyber Command, NSA and other
partners–with our allies and with industry. We’ve got to figure how we’re
going to work together.

How are we going to protect the nation in cyberspace? he asked a bunch
of Military
Intelligence Industrial Complex <http://www.afcea.org/board.cfm> types.

At his cyber speech, Alexander also described his plan to build, train, and
field one-third of the force by September 30 — something you might think he
would have mentioned at BlackHat.

Not a hint of that.

Our US CyberCommander said — to a bunch of industry types — that we need to
have a debate about how to protect the nation in cyberspace.

But then, a month later, with the group who are probably most fit to debate
him on precisely those issues, he was all but silent.

Just terror terror terror.
- See more at: http://www.emptywheel.net/#sthash.51FeJON9.dpuf


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to