**
 [image: Just the
Facts]<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/a4bc65c6da/utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>
------------------------------

Thursday, August 15, 2013
 Secretary of State Kerry's trip to Colombia and Brazil
<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/a613160238/utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%26%2339%3Bs%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>

 <http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/4f0bf626a7>

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry took a quick trip to Brazil and Colombia
from Sunday night until Tuesday. This was Secretary Kerry’s second trip to
the region, following his attendance at the Organization of American
States’ general assembly meeting in Guatemala in June.

The visit came after of President Obama’s trip to Mexico and Costa
Rica<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/81319321c4/utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=trip%20to%20Mexico%20and%20Costa%20Rica&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>in
early May and Vice President Joe Biden’s six-day
tour<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/6fce5ca21a/utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=six-day%20tour&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>to
Colombia, Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago in late May.

The Obama Administration has been fairly engaged with the region, mostly
with regards to trade. As the New York
Times<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/995539f4e8>noted,
the increased focus on strengthening ties comes at a time when the
“United States’ influence has faded as China has surged as a crucial
trading partner for an array of Latin American countries and as Brazil has
sought to raise its economic and diplomatic profile.”

Secretary Kerry’s trip also came on the heels of former National Security
Agency contractor Edward Snowden’s
revelations<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/225c91ba41>that
massive global surveillance programs had targeted several Latin
American countries -- including several allies like Mexico, Colombia and
Brazil – and that the agency had
established<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/ef4ac0cfba>a
data collection center in Brasília, Brazil’s capital city. The leaked
documents drew tremendous regional criticism and have roiled
relations<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/579a006fd4>with
several governments,
particularly<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/8a97caeb50>the
Rousseff administration in Brazil.

*Colombia*

All reports of Secretary Kerry’s meetings in Colombia, the United States’
strongest ally in the region, indicate that the visit went fairly smoothly
with no surprises. In his discussions with Colombia President Juan Manuel
Santos and Foreign Minister María Ángela Holguín, Kerry
reportedly<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/efd2a34cd7>discussed
the ongoing peace negotiations with the FARC rebels, trade,
energy, counternarcotics, and briefly, the NSA leaks. (For a list of links
to articles see Just the Facts' U.S. policy news
section<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/d6c4f5ea5e/colombia_tags=U.S.%20Policy&utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=U%2ES%2E%20policy%20news%20section&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>for
Colombia)

*Support for peace process*

As expected, Kerry
reiterated<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/9422e13e9e>the
United States’ support for the peace process, calling it “courageous,”
“imaginative” and “necessary.” Although the Obama Administration has
already voice its approval of the talks, Kerry’s words come at a time when,
according to a recent Ipsos poll, 54
percent<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/9011fb8a80>has
criticized the process at every opportunity.

As was also expected, Secretary Kerry spoke about the high-value the United
States places on its relationship with Colombia and
lauded<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/a4b49fbbc7>its
U.S.-backed efforts in the war on drugs, calling the country “one of
the very few success stories anywhere.”

*Issues surrounding NSA surveillance programs assuaged*

Ahead of the meeting, there were
concerns<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/187c9cef98>that
the disclosures about NSA surveillance practices would tarnish the
visit. Last Thursday President Santos called for further clarification from
Washington about U.S. intelligence practices in Colombia. However, it
seemed the Colombian government was satisfied with the explanation
provided, as both parties downplayed the revelations following Secretary
Kerry’s visit. Colombian Foreign Minister María Ángela Holguín
said<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/7013dffc46>Colombia
had “received the necessary assurances to continue work on this,”
while Kerry 
noted<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/dccad394b6>the
issue played only a “small part” in the overall discussion.

*U.S. security assistance*

Before heading to Brazil, Secretary Kerry went to the Colombian National
Police Counter-Narcotics Directorate for a briefing on U.S.-Colombia
collaboration in the drug war and an update on Colombia’s training of third
party foreign forces. *Between 2010 and 2012, Colombia
trained<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/564d50fc93/utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=trained&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>9,983
military and police personnel from 45 countries – the top recipients
being Mexico, Panama, Honduras, Ecuador and Peru. (** Belize, Bolivia,
Brazil, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, ElSalvador, Argentina
 , and Paraguay )(See
here<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/7133a4f3da/utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=here&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>for
more on Colombian training of foreign forces.)
*

As a recent Just the Facts
podcast<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/b801160638/utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=podcast&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>noted,
Kerry spent 28 years as a United States senator and was a big
supporter of U.S. military aid packages to Colombia, but did however
condemn human rights abuses in the country, even calling for the U.S. not
to certify Colombia to receive aid in 2005 over such concerns.

For a previous post on Secretary Kerry’s record on Colombia see
here<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/9cbf29765c/utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=here&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>and
to read about what topics Secretary Kerry should have touched on when
discussing a lasting peace in Colombia, see
here<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/bf064eda67/utm_content=cort.greene%40gmail.com&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_medium=Email&utm_term=here&utm_campaign=%5BBlog%5D%20Secretary%20of%20State%20Kerry%27s%20trip%20to%20Colombia%20and%20Brazil>.
These include ongoing assassinations of human rights defenders, impunity
for military members alleged to have committed human rights abuses and the
passage of a military justice system reform that will likely allow that
impunity to continue.

*Brazil*

*NSA revelations fallout*

Secretary Kerry’s
trip<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/d4e1695f14>to
Brazil was more contentious, with the NSA leaks eclipsing the rest of
the visit. Brazil, an important ally with whom the United States has a warm
relationship (albeit nowhere near as close as with Colombia), has been much
more 
vocal<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/87104c816d>in
its condemnation of U.S. intelligence programs. As the New
Yorker<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/c89dd03660>explained
last month, Brazil was the regional center for the NSA spying
programs as it is where “all transatlantic cables come ashore,” making it
an important telecommunication hub linking South America to Europe and
Africa.

Last week, Brazil’s Foreign Minister Antonio Patriota, along with the
foreign ministers of Argentina, Bolivia, Venezuela and Uruguay,
met<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/3d61672589>with
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon last week to protest the NSA
programs.

Minister Patriota
continued<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/1ca5e517fa>his
condemnation in a joint press conference with his U.S. counterpart
following an hour-long meeting, sending a clear message: “We need to stop
practices that violate sovereignty.” Minister Patriota was unsatisfied with
the details Secretary Kerry had shared with him about NSA surveillance
programs, which he
said<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/a62aa692d3>presented
a “new type of challenge in our bilateral relationship … And if
those challenges are not resolved in a satisfactory way, we run the risk of
casting a shadow of distrust over our work."

Kerry 
responded<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/3839b80d99>with
vague, appeasing remarks, saying, “Brazil is owed answers with respect
to those questions, and they will get them.” He then defended the NSA
surveillance program as something “we think we must do to provide security
not just for Americans but for Brazilians and for people in the world.”

*Boeing Contract*

That “shadow of distrust” could have big financial implications for the
United States. Ahead of the meeting, the Brazilian government took an
anticipated discussion over a coveted $4 billion dollar deal (with expected
increases) to purchase 36 fighter jets from the U.S. off the table. Before
the NSA leaks, Boeing’s F/A-18 fighter jet had been favored over competing
French and Swedish warplanes. However
Reuters<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/19e469626e>reported
the NSA scandal has "set back" the United States' chances to land
the deal, recording one Brazilian official as saying, “We cannot talk about
the fighters now.… You cannot give such a contract to a country that you do
not trust.”

*Going forward*

Aside from the NSA issue, the New York
Times<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/b3338c09ee/_r=0>reported,
“it was clear at the end of Mr. Kerry’s visit that solutions to
certain problems remain unresolved, like Washington’s requirement that
Brazilians traveling to the United States have visas, even though
Brazilians rank among the highest-spending foreign tourists and Brazilian
companies are increasingly investing in the United States.”

Reuters<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/3e25a92234>reported
Brazilian officials were optimistic that the two countries will be
able to move past the scandal, while the New York
Times<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/3b0bcbe909/_r=0>and
Wall
Street 
Journal<http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/9070285c24>pointed
out that President Roussett’s state visit to Washington – the first
from a Latin American leader since 2010 when then-Mexican President
Calderón came – is still on for October.

The Obama Administration has been trying to deepen relations with Brazil, a key
ally <http://cts.vresp.com/c/?JusttheFacts/8ee506bd3c/36ddb1edf4/3e0ba1ae7c>in
the region for energy cooperation, security and environmental policy,
and economic integration. Relations have improved under President Rousseff,
after a chilling during former President Lula da Silva’s tenure.
 By Sarah Kinosian at
08/15/2013

 Tuesday, February 12, 2013
With and without U.S. aid, Colombia's training of other security forces
increases

<http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=16813>
Chinese Army participants in a marksmanship course pose with their
Colombian instructors last August
(source<http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=16813>
).

In its 
public<http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112hhrg70665/pdf/CHRG-112hhrg70665.pdf>
 
statements<http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/15/remarks-president-obama-and-president-santos-colombia-joint-press-confer>
 about <http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116054>Colombia
lately, the Obama administration has praised the South American country as
a “security exporter.” As a June 2012 Defense Department
release<http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116966> put
it, “Colombia now serves as a regional training base to help other nations
in their counterdrug efforts.”

Colombia is now not only the Western Hemisphere’s largest
recipient<http://justf.org/country?country=Colombia> of
U.S. military and police assistance. Its security forces are also training,
advising and otherwise assisting those of third countries. “Colombia, for
example, offers capacity-building assistance in 16 countries inside and
outside the region, including
Africa,”according<http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116037>
to
an April 2012 Defense Department news release. Colombian Defense Minister
Juan Carlos Pinzón
told<http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/10/31/3076606/colombias-military-needs-to-prepare.html>
 the *Miami Herald* recently that his forces have trained more than 13,000
individuals from 40 countries since 2005.

This trend is accelerating. As part of an ongoing “High Level Strategic
Security Dialogue,” in early 2012 the U.S. and Colombian governments
developed an “Action Plan on Regional Security Cooperation,” through which
they intend to coordinate aid to third countries. According to a joint
press release <http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/04/187928.htm>:

“Both countries will develop complementary security assistance programs and
operational efforts to support hemispheric and international partner
nations afflicted by effects of transnational organized crime. Increased
coordination of U.S. and Colombia defense and security support activities,
which are aligned with efforts by both countries to strengthen civilian law
enforcement capacity and capabilities, will support whole-of-government
strategies and produce a greater effect throughout the hemisphere and West
Africa.”

We don’t know the extent of these “defense and security support
activities,” or what portion of them are funded by the United States
(probably the majority). However, a combination of primary and secondary
sources yields the following examples of what has been happening.

With funding from the State Department-managed Central America Regional
Security Initiative (CARSI), Colombia’s National Police participate in
a *Central
America* Regional Police Reform Project. “[T]he Colombian National Police
provides training and assistance in such topics as community policing,
police academy instructor training, and curriculum development in
Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Costa Rica, and Panama,” reads an April
2012 joint press release<http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/04/187928.htm>.
“To complement this police training by Colombia, the United States trains
prosecutors in these countries.”

“Colombia sends mobile training teams to *El Salvador, Panama and Costa
Rica,*” the commander of U.S. Army South, a component of U.S. Southern
Command, noted <http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116966> in
June 2012. Colombia trains police in *Honduras and Guatemala*, a senior
U.S. defense official
said<http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116037> in
April 2012.

That month, members of the Colombian Navy’s new Coast Guard Mobile Training
Group traveled to*Honduras* for its first foreign training mission, with 47
Honduran military students. In July 2012, this unit gave an 11-day course
to 37 members of *Panama’s* National Police, National Border Service, and
Institutional Protection Service. According to a July 2012
release<http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=15913>
from
Colombia’s armed forces, the Navy Training Group planned to offer similar
courses to *the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, Guatemala*, and again *
Honduras* during the second half of 2012.

In November 2012, 12 enlisted men from *Panama’s* security forces were
receiving training alongside fifty counterparts from Colombia’s army in
Tolemaida, Tolima, the Bogotá daily *El Tiempo*
reported<http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/CMS-12387887>.
The Panamanian government paid the training costs for some, while others
received grants, *El Tiempo* indicated, without indicating these grants’
origin. “The militaries of *Ecuador, Argentina*, and*Central American
nations* have requested spaces [in this course],” the director of the
Colombian Army’s Non-Commissioned Officers School (*Escuela Militar de
Suboficiales*), Col. Juan Felipe Yepes, said. “We’ve now had more than 100
[students] from other countries, and more requests keep coming.”

In May 2012, the Tolemaida army base
graduated<http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=14562>
22
members of *Panama’s* National Border Service who took part in
“International 81-Millimeter Mortars Course No. 02.”

Colombia is also offering training to some neighbors in *South America*. In
August 2012, *Peru* sent two naval officers to Coveñas, on Colombia’s
Caribbean coast, for an explosives technician course. “The Navy of Colombia
has invited the Navy of Peru to send Navy personnel to participate in
several courses, among them the Marines course, during the 2012 academic
year,” reads a Peruvian government resolution
[PDF<http://www.asesorempresarial.com/web/pdf/31082012.pdf>].
That month, seven Colombian Special Forces and Army helicopter pilots paid
a 
visit<http://www.eluniversal.com.co/cartagena/nacional/en-peru-el-ejercito-colombiano-demostro-que-es-es-un-modelo-para-seguir-86330>
to
Junín, Peru for a 15-day “exchange of experiences” with about 90
representatives of that country’s security forces. In October 2012, the
commander of Peru’s army paid a visit to the Colombian Army’s Tolemaida
base, where he “highlighted the training, capacities and skills that his
men acquire” there, according to a Colombian Army
release<http://www.cenae.mil.co/?idcategoria=338189>
.

The U.S. government has encouraged Peru to work more closely with Colombia.
“The United States stands ready to work with Peru on joint planning, on
information sharing, trilateral cooperation with Colombia to address our
shared security concerns,”
said<http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=5133>
outgoing
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta during an October 2012 visit to Lima.

In January 2013, the director of Ecuador’s military academy paid a
visit<http://www.fuerzasmilitares.org/noticias/colombia/ejercito-nacional/2206-nos-visita-el-director-de-la-escuela-militar-del-ejercito-del-ecuador>
to
the Colombian Army’s Tolemaida base “to learn about the academic procedures
the Colombian Military uses to educate and train its own soldiers.” In
October 2012, the commanding officers of the Marine Corps of*Ecuador* visited
Colombia’s Marine Training Base, where they viewed a demonstration of some
of the training that the facility offers. The
release<http://www.armada.mil.co/content/visita-del-personal-del-comando-infanter-de-marina-ecuatoriana>
from
Colombia’s Navy did not indicate whether Ecuadorian personnel have
received, or will receive, training at this base.

Training of forces from the *Caribbean* has included the Colombian Naval
Academy’s December 2012
graduation<http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=18467>
of
two cadets from the *Dominican Republic*.

Colombia’s training relationship with *Mexico* is quite extensive. It has
included the instruction of “thousands of Mexican policemen,” as the
*Washington
Post* 
reported<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/21/AR2011012106325_pf.html>
back
in January 2011.

“Early one morning shortly before dawn, Colombian police commandos barked
orders like drill sergeants at six Mexican policemen and two Mexican
soldiers during a mock attack here outside Cajica, a town on a frigid
mountain in central Colombia. The target in the training exercise: a
heavily defended rebel camp.

It was the tail end of four months of training that included lessons on how
to carry out operations in the jungle, jump from helicopters, defuse bombs
and conduct raids on urban strongholds.”

“Colombian service members have trained more than two dozen Mexican
helicopter pilots” as of April 2012, a U.S. Defense official said in a
Pentagon news release<http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116037>
.

Sixteen <http://www.proceso.com.mx/?p=283550> Mexican students — 15 federal
police and one army soldier — participated in the grueling 19-week course
given by the Colombian National Police’s (CNP) elite *Jungla* commando unit
between July and December 2011. Also taking part in the course, at the
Jungla base in Tolima department, were about 58 students from ten
other<http://bogota.usembassy.gov/pr_deajungladec6_2011.html> Latin
American countries: *Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, the Dominican
Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama*, and*Paraguay*.
(Not all of them graduated.) “This Colombian initiative is supported by the
U.S. Embassy through its Narcotics Affairs Section (NAS) and the DEA,”
reads a U.S. embassy press
release<http://bogota.usembassy.gov/pr_deajungladec6_2011.html>.
“Since 2007, the NAS-financed CNP National Training Center in Pijaos has
trained nearly 300 international students. NAS has allotted nearly 8
million dollars in the construction of the training center’s initial phase,
inaugurated in 2008.”

Sources reveal several other multi-country training events. The Colombian
Army’s *Lancero* Special Forces unit, similar to the U.S. Army’s Rangers,
now offers an international course at the Tolemaida base. Colombia’s armed
forces report <http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=18428> that
581 trainees from 18 countries have taken the *Lancero*course including, in
December 2012, 15 graduates from *Brazil, Canada, Ecuador, El Salvador,
France*, and *Peru*.

The Colombian Armed Forces’ Superior War College
hosted<http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=13561> the
April 2012 Inter-American Naval War Games, in which representatives
from *Brazil,
Chile, Ecuador, the United States, Mexico, Peru*, and *the Dominican
Republic* participated in threat simulations to coordinate joint action.

In June 2012, Colombia
hosted<http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116681>
 *Fuerzas Comando*, an annual competition between Latin America’s Special
Forces sponsored by U.S. Southern Command. Those competing at the Colombian
National Training Center in Tolemaida included *the Bahamas, Belize,
Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay,
Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, the United States*, and*Uruguay*.

Another multi-nation event took place in Cartagena in June-August 2012,
where Colombia’s Navy trained officers from *Argentina, Chile, the
Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico,
Panamá, Paraguay, Peru*, and *the United States*. They received coast guard
instruction, according to a Notimex article: “maritime interdiction
procedures, maneuvers, exercises with interceptor craft, defense and
survival techniques.” Since this course’s inauguration in 2012, Notimex
notes, Colombia has given it to 114 students from 24 Western Hemisphere
countries. A new
session<http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=16945> of
this two-month Coast Guard course began in September 2012 with the
participation of 14 trainees from *Belize, Canada, Costa Rica, the
Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica,
Mexico, Panama*, and *Peru*.

In October 2012, Colombia’s Army
hosted<http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=17630> a
“First International Doctrine Symposium” in Bogotá, with the presence of
representatives from *Brazil, Chile, China, Spain, the United Kingdom*, and
*the United States*.

Colombia is also training some personnel from outside Latin America. “*People’s
Republic of China*Colonel Deng Yubo said that [Chinese personnel] have been
in Tolemaida for a month receiving marksmanship training,”
reported<http://www.eluniversal.com.co/cartagena/nacional/en-peru-el-ejercito-colombiano-demostro-que-es-es-un-modelo-para-seguir-86330>
Colombia’s
Colprensa wire service in August 2012. The ten-week course took
place<http://www.cgfm.mil.co/CGFMPortal/faces/index.jsp?id=16813> at
the Colombian Army’s Lancero School.

Police from ten *African* countries were
in<http://www.elheraldo.co/region/colombia-ayuda-a-africa-en-estrategia-antidroga-97159>
Santa
Marta, on Colombia’s Caribbean coast, in January 2013 to take part in a
Colombian National Police-hosted port and airport security seminar.
According to an April 2012 Pentagon news
release<http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=116037>,
“[T]he Defense Department is looking to Colombia and Brazil, both of which
already have deep ties to Africa and now provide assistance there, to help
U.S. Africa Command with peacekeeping and other efforts there.”

Even as they face their country’s own unresolved armed conflict and
organized crime challenges, Colombia’s security forces will be increasing
their training of other countries’ militaries and police. This will often
happen with U.S. support. This was a chief topic when top officials from
both countries met in Bogotá last November to continue the U.S.-Colombia
“High Level Strategic Security Dialogue.” An unnamed Defense Department
official said <http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=118122> in
October, “we’re building a detailed action plan where we and the Colombians
will coordinate who does what … so we leverage … the resources and
capabilities we have to effectively do capacity building and training and
other things in Central America and in other places.”

While Colombia has a lot of experience with the type of operations that
police around Latin America must carry out today — organized crime
investigations, drug interdiction, efforts to arrest kingpins — the
expansion of its training raises concerns, especially when the U.S.
government is paying the bill.

   -

   What *human rights messages* are Colombian trainers conveying, both
   inside and outside the classroom? Colombia’s armed forces continue to
   confront allegations, including judicial cases, of thousands of abuses in
   the past 10-20 years. Some of the most prominent are a wave of
   extrajudicial executions during the mid-2000s and widespread collaboration
   with murderous paramilitary groups in the 1990s and early 2000s. Colombian
   military officials frequently express disdain for, or outright anger at,
   the country’s judicial system and non-governmental human rights defenders,
   and their institution recently pressed successfully to reduce civilian
   courts’ jurisdiction over them in human rights cases.
   -

   Especially when the U.S. government is paying, what assurances do we
   have about the*quality and rigor* of the training and education being
   provided? Colombian officers have long experience in combat and fighting
   organized crime, but their ability as trainers and the quality of their
   instructor courses is unknown.
   -

   When the U.S. government is paying, how can citizens and congressional
   oversight personnel get information about courses given, recipient
   countries and units, the identities of trainers, the number of trainees,
   and the overall cost? Training by U.S. officials generally shows up in the
   State Department’s annual Foreign Military Training Reports, but the work
   of U.S.-funded Colombian trainers rarely, if ever, appears in these
   reports. This raises a critical *transparency* issue.
   -

   When the U.S. government is paying, and information about training
   events is unavailable or difficult to obtain, how can we verify that *human
   rights conditions in foreign aid law* are being respected? How can we be
   sure that the units and individuals giving and receiving the training are
   clear of credible allegations of past abuse?

(WOLA Intern Elizabeth Glusman contributed much research to this post.)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to