Places you should be able to read this online, with graphics intact. http://clearingthefogradio.org/
https://www.facebook.com/login.php?next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fgroups%2F461619557192964%2F http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyunderground/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- *UNLEASHING THE FASCIST POODLES * ** Glenn Greenwald and partner, David Miranda *British activists called Tony Blair "Bush's poodle" when he supported the illegal invasion of Iraq and the phony reasons concocted to support it. Now it looks like the current British government is still pandering to the Empire, as it yesterday detained Glenn Greenwald's partner, David Miranda, under the Terrorist Act. Greenwald responded <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/18/david-miranda-detained-uk-nsa>, "If the UK and US governments believe that tactics like this are going to deter or intimidate us in any way from continuing to report aggressively on what these documents reveal, they are beyond deluded. If anything, it will have only the opposite effect: to embolden us even further." * *If you would like to complain about this totalitarian act to the British Embassy in Washington, here's their email address: * *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>* ** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *A DEATH THREAT TO ONE WHO TELLS THE TRUTH * ** */Time/ magazine's senior national correspondent Michael Grunwald tweeted <http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/08/18> "I can't wait to write a defense of the drone strike that takes out Julian Assange," to show his allegiance to the National Security State. His job should be safe now that he has sided with killing journalists who report the truth around corporate media. Other corporate "journalists" have called for the death of Assange (see picture, above). * *In such a hostile environment, where mainstream media reporters support the murder of the Wikileaks founder, it is no wonder that Wikileaks has posted 400 gigabytes of encrypted "insurance" data online <http://rt.com/news/wikileaks-encrypted-files-facebook-626/>. The data can't be read without an encryption key, but the movement's supporters say that could be published later in case anything happens to leading Wikileaks figures.* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *SOMETIMES AL QAEDA IS ON OUR SIDE * ** *Thousands of Syrian Kurds are fleeing into Iraq <http://uk.reuters.com/video/2013/08/18/syrian-kurd-refugees-flee-in-fear-of-al?videoId=252080198> from the al Nusra (allied with al Qaeda) front-- terrorists released on the people of Syria by our government and its client states in the Middle East. This shameful thing is being suppressed by the mainstream American media, just as a similar releasing of al Qaeda terrorists on the people of Libya was blacked out of mainstream media. * *It would only confuse the masses in the Land of the Free if our global enemy were discovered to be our ally from time to time. Nobody "justifies" money for the National Security State more than al Qaeda.* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ **Our government is run by outlaws who murder at will, enabled by a sycophantic mainstream media. There is a complete disregard for international law, only a pretense when things go wrong. ** **One of the sickest elements is the murders by drone, a cowardly act in defiance of decency by any standard. Every once in awhile President Obama takes time out from writing kill lists to attempt to fool the masses that he has a policy which is fully legal, with all the proper oversight by all the proper officials. One is reminded of the Eagle's "Life in the Fast Lane," in which the characters "knew all the right people, they took all the right pills." Delusion reigns supreme in the Land of the Free. ** **Currently Obama is vacationing in Martha's Vineyard where elite campaign sponsors allow him to rub elbows in return for his devoted service on their behalf. None of the bastards at any of the parties he attends are worried that their children will be bombed in the middle of the night, surrounded as they are by servants, security, and an omnipresent sickness none of them can sense --Jack Balkwill** Obama has not delivered on May's promise of transparency on drones <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/17/obama-promise-transparency-drone-killing> *An escalation of drone strikes in Yemen highlights the fact that the US public is still in the dark about this use of lethal force* * * *by Naureen Shah * *The past two weeks have seen an escalation in drone strikes more dramatic than any since 2009.* *The media estimate that more than 37 people <http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/13/us-yemen-violence-idUSBRE97C06B20130813> have died in a series of strikes in Yemen <http://www.theguardian.com/world/yemen>. The US government has refused to officially acknowledge the strikes surge or reports of potentially unlawful deaths <http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/10/world/meast/yemen-drone-al-qaeda/> -- just as it did, for years, refuse to confirm reports of the more than 300 drone strikes in Pakistan. On drones <http://www.theguardian.com/world/drones>, secrecy is business as usual -- and it carries on.* *Earlier this summer, however, there was hope for a different way forward. In late May, the White House released more information about US drone strikes than it ever had before. Following a major address on national security by President Obama <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-national-defense-university>, the government pledged to keep sharing "as much information as possible".* *In fact, since May, the White House has not officially released any new information on drone strikes (though leaks still abound). While NSA surveillance has taken center-stage, the government's policy of secrecy and obfuscation on drones persists, too. Past critics of the drone program -- ranging from Senator Rand Paul (Republican, Kentucky) to Senator Ron Wyden (Democrat, Oregon) -- should take notice. It is time to renew and expand the demand for answers about who is being killed.* *Instead of acknowledging the new strikes and describing a coherent policy and legal approach, the government has again chosen to selectively disclose information that raises more questions than it answers. Thus, an unattributed leak to the New York Times <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/10/us/threats-test-obamas-balancing-act-on-surveillance.html?ref=markmazzetti&_r=0> on Monday served up a major policy change in the form of a morsel, with little elaboration, that a recent terrorist threat has "expanded the scope of people we could go after".* *So, the question of whom the United States <http://www.theguardian.com/world/usa> believes it can kill in drone strikes remains, as it ever was, full of unknowns. A handful of bullet-points on the government's "policy standards" for using lethal force <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/fact-sheet-us-policy-standards-and-procedures-use-force-counterterrorism>, which the White House released in May concurrently with the president's national security speech, initially appeared to provide some guidance. But it expressly does not apply in "extraordinary circumstances", and since the embassy closures of earlier this month could be interpreted as providing such justification, the memorandum may not be relevant to the latest spate of strikes in Yemen.* *The White House could clarify this issue; better yet, it could move beyond conveniently malleable policy standards and describe how the government applies existing international law. Instead, the White House has again chosen to operate secretly and under rules of its own creation, which may permit killing individuals under a concept of "imminence" (of threat) that departs radically from all conventional interpretations of the law.* *Even more damning is that, in the absence of any commitment to investigating credible allegations of unlawful deaths, the United States appears indifferent to the question of who is actually dying in drone strikes. President Obama admitted in May that four US citizens had been killed, three of whom -- including 16-year-old Abdulrahman Aal-Awlaki -- he admitted were not intended targets. But the president did not define the identities of the more than 4,000 other people killed, or specifically address reports that a significant number of the dead -- in assessments varying between 400 and nearly 1,000, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism <http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/category/projects/drones/> -- were civilians.* *When the president acknowledges four deaths of US citizens, but not 4,000 deaths of non-Americans, he signals to the world a callous and discriminatory disregard for human life. Perhaps only a fraction of these 4,000 deaths were unlawful. But acknowledging and investigating these deaths is a matter of dignity and justice -- for the survivors of strikes, their communities and their countrymen.* *When deaths are found to be unlawful, victims' families and survivors have a right to reparation. Refusing to investigate deaths is a matter of disrespect both for international law and for the public's right to know the full truth.* *Many critics, before President Obama's May address, feared that foreign governments would follow the US to lead and conduct secret drone strikes without regard for international law. They should still be concerned about the precedent the US government is setting: refusing to investigate or be held accountable for wrongful deaths.* *The risk now is not just that the late May reforms on drone strikes were half-measures, but that they were calibrated to merely reassure the public, defuse criticism, and avert longer, harder scrutiny of whether the government's actions are lawful and right. A token dose of transparency may remove the sting of government secrecy, but it does not cure the disease.* ** http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/17/obama-promise-transparency-drone-killing ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *If you wish to be removed from this list, please let us know* ** *To join the Liberty Underground news service go here: http://luvnews.info/Join.htm* ** *You may also join our talk group athttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/ <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/>if you would like to participate * **or join our Facebook group here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/461619557192964/ * email: [email protected]* ** *Tell your friends about /LUV News/ because some people just don't get it* [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
