*Gigi Ibrahim *@Gsquare86
<https://twitter.com/Gsquare86>54m<https://twitter.com/Gsquare86/status/370485550911741953>

A systematic crack down on
#Suez<https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Suez&src=hash>steel workers for
striking since 22 July, another worker arrested yesterday
at a check point #Egypt <https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Egypt&src=hash>
MENA Solidarity Network <http://menasolidaritynetwork.com/>
Solidarity with Workers in the Middle East
Egypt: Suez steel strikers pursued by police

*Posted on August 22, 2013*

0<http://menasolidaritynetwork.com/2013/08/22/egypt-suez-steel-strikers-pursued-by-police/#comments>

[image: 
army_surrounds_suezsteel_viarevsoc.me]<http://menasolidaritynetwork.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/ljysh_hwl_lswys_llslb_.jpg>

Strike leaders from Suez Steel are still being pursued by police, after the
factory’s owner, Lebanese businessman Rafiq Daou, demanded their arrest and
prosecution. Two workers from the factory were arrested by the Egyptian
Army on 12 August, after armoured cars and riot police surrounded the
plant. They were later released on bail, but four of their colleagues were
arrested by the police on 20 August.

Striking workers in Egypt are facing increasing state repression. Charges
against strikers often include accusations of criminal damage, assault
against police officers and “aggression against the right to work”. A law
brought in by the military in the wake of Mubarak’s downfall in 2011 sets
stiff penalties for strikes including large fines and imprisonment.

*What you can do:*

   - *Rush messages of protest to General Abd-al-Fattah al-Sisi, Commander
   in Chief of the Egyptian Armed Forces, demanding the immediate release of
   arrested workers from Suez Steel, and call for all charges against them to
   be dropped. Email General al-Sisi here [email protected] copy in Kamal
   Abu Aita, Minister of Labour ([email protected]) and the Egyptian
   Ambassador to the UK ([email protected]) or your country. *
   - *Send messages of solidarity to the Suez Steel workers by leaving a
   comment under this article*
   - *Sign the emergency
statement<http://menasolidaritynetwork.com/2013/08/18/egypt-emergency-statement-on-the-military-crackdown/>
against
   the military crackdown on protests in Egypt*

*
*
*
*
*Gigi Ibrahim *@Gsquare86
<https://twitter.com/Gsquare86>11h<https://twitter.com/Gsquare86/status/370324012695842816>

Must read to understand why Mubarak is being released and why it is not
over, case resumes 25 Aug
#Egypt<https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Egypt&src=hash>
#Mubarak <https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Mubarak&src=hash> http://
m.eipr.org/en/pressrelease/2013/08/21/1790 … <http://t.co/7HqtEDjqEK>
*
*
*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
*
*
*
*
Published on *Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights* (http://eipr.org)

------------------------------
Mubarak's Trials and Legal Status Q&A
Criminal Justice <http://eipr.org/en/programs/8> [1]
Wednesday 21 August 2013

*Q: What were the charges against Mubarak?*

A: The Public Prosecution has leveled official charges at Mubarak and
others in four cases so far:

1. The killing of demonstrators in 2011, influence peddling and profiting
from the export of gas to Israel.

2. Illicit gain (his wealth is not commensurate with his income).

3. Presidential palaces case (he appropriated for himself, his wife Suzanne
Thabet and his sons Alaa and Gamal funds allocated annually for the upkeep
of the presidential palaces).

4. Receipt of gifts from state-owned press institutions.



*Q: Have judgments been issued against Mubarak in any of these cases?*

A: The cases involving illicit gain, the presidential palaces and the
receipt of gifts from press institutions are still pending; Mubarak has not
yet been acquitted or convicted in these cases.

For the charge of killing demonstrators, he was sentenced to life
imprisonment on 2 June 2012. Following an appeal, the Court of Cassation
overturned the judgment on 13 January 2013, and the retrial is currently
underway.



*Q: Is Mubarak still held on remand in connection with any of these cases?*

A: No. In the killing of demonstrators case, Mubarak spent two years in
pretrial detention, the maximum period allowed under the Code of Criminal
Procedure for defendants accused of committing a crime that carries the
death penalty. He received a release order in this case on 15 April 2013,
while being held in connection with the other corruption cases.

On 20 June 2013, during the tenure of Mohamed Morsi, a court order was
issued for Mubarak’s release from pretrial detention in the illicit gains
case. The Public Prosecution appealed this order, but the Court of Appeals
rejected the appeal and upheld the release.

On 19 August 2013, another court order was issued for Mubarak’s release in
connection with the presidential palaces case, although his children remain
in detention in connection with this case.

At this point, Mubarak was held only for allegedly receiving gifts from
press institutions. The value of the gifts was repaid, after which his
lawyers contested the pretrial detention order. That petition was heard
today and the court ordered his release.



*Q: Does this mean Mubarak will be released?*

A: Yes. After the petition against pretrial detention for the press gifts
case was accepted today, Mubarak can no longer be held in custody in
connection with any of the four cases pending against him, which means he
will be released.



*Q: Does this mean that Mubarak has been acquitted in the corruption cases?*

A: No. The three corruption cases in connection with which the court
ordered Mubarak’s release are still pending; no conviction or acquittal has
been issued. Mubarak has simply been temporarily released until the trials
are concluded.



*Q: Can the Public Prosecution order Mubarak’s continued detention?*

A: After the court accepted Mubarak’s petition today against his pretrial
detention and ordered his release, the Public Prosecution can appeal this
ruling. At this point, it is up to the court: either accept the
prosecution’s appeal and overturn the previous order to release Mubarak or
reject the prosecution’s appeal and uphold the temporary release order.



*Q: Does Mubarak’s release mean that he cannot be placed in pretrial
detention again?*

A: No. The judicial investigating bodies in the cases still pending against
Mubarak may issue new pretrial detention orders if the proper conditions
are met. However, the prosecutor cannot order him detained beyond the
maximum term of pretrial detention allowed in these cases, as illustrated
by the killing of demonstrators case.



*Q: What conditions must be met for the courts to place Mubarak in pretrial
detention in the future?*

A: Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, the court may remand a defendant
while the case is pending in the following cases: If the defendant, accused
of a felony or misdemeanor carrying prison time, has no known residence in
Egypt, or if the defendant is accused of a felony or misdemeanor that
carries a sentence of at least one year imprisonment, the evidence against
him is sufficient and any of the following conditions apply:

   - If the crime is apprehended while being committed, in which case the
   sentence must be executed immediately upon issuance.
   - If there are fears that the defendant might flee the jurisdiction.
   - If there are fears that the investigation will be harmed, either
   through influencing the victims or witnesses, evidence tampering or
   collusion with other perpetrators to change or suppress the facts.
   - To prevent a breakdown in public security and order that may result
   due to the gravity of the crime.



*Q: Why has Mubarak’s trial lasted for more than two years?*

A: Egyptian law sets no time limit for trials, and they may go on for
several years. The law only defines the maximum period for which defendants
may be held in pretrial detention, setting limits on these terms in
consideration of the violation of personal liberties it entails.



*Q: Have the investigating bodies played a role in extending the length of
the trial?*

A: Of course. The Public Prosecution files criminal charges and brings the
evidence to support the defendant’s conviction. The Public Prosecution was
slow to charge Mubarak. The public prosecutor at the time, Abd al-Megid
Mahmoud, only ordered an investigation into Mubarak on 10 April 2011—that
is, two months after he stepped down—after massive popular pressure in the
form of huge demonstrations dubbed the Friday of Prosecution and Purging.
Until that date, all charges had been filed against Mubarak’s interior
minister, Habib al-Adli, and his deputies and other ministers and regime
leaders in financial corruption cases.

When the Public Prosecution charged Mubarak with participating in the
murder of demonstrators in the January 2011 events, influence peddling and
profiting from gas export to Israel, all these charges were joined in one
case. The other cases were opened later and have not yet been brought to
trial.



*Q: Did the Public Prosecution play a role in the way the prosecution of
Mubarak was handled?*

A: Yes. The Public Prosecution has jurisdiction over investigations; based
on its investigations, it either charges the defendant, closes the case or
rules that there are no grounds for a case.

The Public Prosecution is also the charging authority. As such, if it files
formal charges, it must present all the substantiating evidence on which
the court will base its judgment. The more hard evidence the prosecution
submits, the easier it is for the court to issue its judgment. Conversely,
the weaker the evidence, the more likely the defendants are to escape
punishment.

The Public Prosecution only brought criminal cases against Mubarak on
largely trivial charges in four cases, although many citizens submitted
numerous complaints with supporting evidence.

Moreover, as the representative of the people, the Public Prosecution can
file a criminal case without any citizen complaint. Nevertheless, it did
not charge with Mubarak with further crimes beyond these four cases.

As EIPR learned when representing some victims in the murder of
demonstrators case, the investigations were severely flawed and the
evidence brought by the prosecutor was tenuous. As a result, the grounds
for conviction were weak and the conviction was overturned.



*Q: What role did state agencies play in the course of Mubarak’s trial?*

A: In the case of the killing of demonstrators—in which EIPR represented
some martyrs’ families—state agencies did not cooperate with the Public
Prosecution in obtaining conclusive evidence. For example, General
Intelligence sent the Public Prosecution videotapes devoid of evidence,
telling the prosecution that other tapes relevant to early February had
been “taped over.” Similarly, the police destroyed important criminal
evidence in the same case: a CD containing incoming and outgoing telephone
calls from the operations room of the Central Security Forces. The Public
Prosecution brought a criminal case against the officer responsible for
destroying the evidence, and he was sentenced to two years in prison.



*Q: Will the current events have an impact on the prosecution of Mubarak
for the murder of demonstrators?*

A: It is well established that the judge does not rule based on his
personal knowledge, but rather based on the case file. After the fall of
Muslim Brotherhood rule, Mubarak’s defense will likely shift the blame to
them, especially after the verdict issued in the prison escape from Wadi
al-Natron Prison. The judgment in that case is consistent with and
buttresses the testimony given by Omar Suleiman, the former vice-president,
in the Mubarak trial, when he stated that demonstrators were killed by
“foreign elements” cooperating with the Muslim Brothers.

As for the financial corruption cases, often these cases are settled when
the amount in question is returned.



*Q: When will Mubarak’s trial for the killing of demonstrators resume?*

A: The next session is scheduled for 25 August. Mubarak will be obligated
to attend, even if he has been released.



For more information, see:

EIPR’s report on the Mubarak trial
(Arabic)<http://eipr.org/sites/default/files/pressreleases/pdf/mubarak_trial_report-13jan13.pdf>
 [2]

EIPR statement on the overturned conviction of
Mubarak<http://eipr.org/en/pressrelease/2013/01/13/1581>
 [3]


Attachments
[image: application/pdf icon]mubarl trial
qanda<http://eipr.org/sites/default/files/pressreleases/pdf/mubaraks_trial_qa_0.pdf>
 [4]
------------------------------
*Source URL:* http://eipr.org/en/pressrelease/2013/08/21/1790

*Links:*
[1] http://eipr.org/en/programs/8
[2]
http://eipr.org/sites/default/files/pressreleases/pdf/mubarak_trial_report-13jan13.pdf
[3] http://eipr.org/en/pressrelease/2013/01/13/1581
[4]
http://eipr.org/sites/default/files/pressreleases/pdf/mubaraks_trial_qa_0.pdf


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to