http://humanprovince.wordpress.com/2013/08/29/an-open-letter-on-syria-to-western-narcissists/
An open letter on Syria to Western narcissists

[image: 
Image]<http://humanprovince.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/mideast_syria-08c3c.jpg>On
the eve of what seem to be ineluctable strikes on Syria, I’ve been
struggling with what my position on Syria should be. Before I get to that
though, I should say that while I’m not Syrian, I too have some skin in the
game, as it were. On our way to donate blood for a friend’s mother’s
surgery last month, my wife got a call from a friend telling us to avoid
the neighborhood of Bir al-Abed in Beirut’s southern suburbs, since there
had just been a large explosion
there<http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/07/beirut-bomb-blast-hezbollah-neighborhood-beer-alabed.html>.
At Bahman Hospital, my wife and baby daughter and I saw ambulances speeding
toward us carrying those who had just been wounded. And a few days after
I’d left for southern Turkey to conduct interviews with Syrians who had
fled the war in their homes, I found out that a car bomb had just gone off
a few blocks from my mother in law’s
home<http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/bodies-reportedly-found-south-beirut-explosion-article-1.1427690>
in
the “Hezbollah stronghold” of Rweiss. It kills me that my daughter has
heard the sound of a car bomb before her first birthday.

Extended family from Yarmouk, the Palestinian camp outside Damascus, have
been displaced and are forced to seek
refuge<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omgJovb65HU> yet
again in Lebanon, a country that doesn’t want
them<http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/08/07/lebanon-palestinians-fleeing-syria-denied-entry>.
And even now, we’re making plans for what might happen if the impending
strikes on Syria fuel an escalation in Lebanon, where living in the
southern suburbs can get you killed if there’s a war with Israel. And yet
all of this pales in comparison to what my Syrian friends continue to go
through on a daily basis.

All that to say that the current conflict in Syria isn’t just of academic
interest to me; it’s personal as well. This is partially why I have so
little patience for some of the rhetoric I’ve been seeing from Western
leftist circles, where this conflict seems like nothing more than a
rhetorical bludgeon for scoring ideological points. This has been
illustrated by the passing around of an article by Robert Fisk, who asks, “Does
Obama know he’s fighting on al-Qa’ida’s
side?<http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/does-obama-know-hes-fighting-on-alqaidas-side-8786680.html>”
This lazy and facile opinion piece assures us that if the US attacks Syria,
then “the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.” It is the
flip side of the rhetoric that was so evident in the run-up to war in Iraq
that equated any opposition to an idiotic war with support for Saddam
Hussein. Well, guess what? There are lots of perfectly fine opinions that
might put you on the same side as al-Qa’ida. Just to name one: if you’re
against drone strikes in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia, as I am, then you’re
also “on the same side as al-Qa’ida” according to this logic.

This is the caricature of knee-jerk leftism, where everything is always and
everywhere about the United States. The narcissism of such a position
boggles the mind. In such an ideological stance it’s not enough to be
critical of Washington’s actions and motivations, as well we should be, it
is necessary to parrot the talking points of Washington’s enemies. (The
same phenomenon can be seen in certain
Islamophobic<http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/jun/11/bnp-nick-griffin-syria-assad>
and 
right-wing<http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/08/syria-crisis-russia-and-china-step-up-warnings-to-obama-over-strike.html>
circles.)
In this narrative, the militarization of the uprising in Syria was an
American plan, not a foreseeable reaction to a brutally violent crackdown
on apredominately peaceful opposition
movement<http://www.alharak.org/nonviolence_map/en/> by
the security forces of the Ba’ath regime. This conflict is, so the argument
goes, a creation of Washington, and perhaps Riyadh, and the opposition is
made up of only of blood-thirsty sectarian Islamists who are generally seen
as but tools of malicious statecraft. Such a narrative, of course, denies
the agency of Syrians, seeing them as so many lifeless puppets waiting for
a tug from the imperialist American hand.

This is why discussions of Syria in such quarters tend not to be
discussions of Syria. They’re actually discussions of “American capitalism”
or “American imperialism” – take your pick. So let me be clear: if your
opinion of Syria is actually an opinion about the United States, I have no
interest in hearing it, and it’s probably safe to say that most Syrians (or
at least all of the ones I know) who are faced with the business end of the
regime’s ordinance don’t either. I can’t think of a single Syrian who’s
willing to get killed so you can flaunt your anti-imperialist street cred
from the comfort of your local coffee shop.

Lest I be accused of shilling for American intervention here, let me set a
few things straight. In addition to endangering my family’s lives, the
proposed “punitive strikes” that are all but inevitable probably won’t make
anything better on the
ground<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324324404579041080358452504.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories>,
and may make things worse, which is why I’m against them. My opinion on
American intervention in general and in this conflict in particular (about
which more in a subsequent post) is that the US is not to be trusted to act
in anything but what it sees as its interests, and often a woefully
short-sighted understanding of those interests to boot. So no, Washington
does not really care about those children killed last week in a chemical
attack, just as it didn’t care about the Iranians or Kurds killed in
previous 
ones<http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/08/25/secret_cia_files_prove_america_helped_saddam_as_he_gassed_iran?page=full>.
Consequently, my feeling is that a vicious, and viciously short-sighted,*
realpolitik* in Washington would probably like nothing better than to let
its enemiesfight indefinitely in
Syria<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/25/opinion/sunday/in-syria-america-loses-if-either-side-wins.html?_r=0>,
burning the country to the ground as they do so.

But please, don’t let the conflict in Syria be about opposing America. Let
it be about 
Syria<http://mondoweiss.net/2013/08/dos-and-donts-for-progressives-discussing-syria.html>,
and what might actually help Syrians – you know, the actually existing
people who are dying by the tens of thousands in this brutal war. But if
you can’t do that, then do me a favor, and please shut up.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to