I'm blissfully awaiting the day that Ceph is declared stable. ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
On 12-09-14 12:24 AM, Petr Bena wrote: > Actually, there are issues with gluster which isn't much better, so > any alternative to gluster or nfs would be nice > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Damian Zaremba > <[email protected]> wrote: >> As seen on a few instances today; >> [ 825.247230] svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). >> [463494.148261] svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). >> [1442873.402458] svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). >> >> Logins also seem to be rather laggy, ganglia shows spiky cpu on the nfs >> instance. >> >> Any chance of moving home dirs over to the same cluster as project storage >> any time soon? >> >> NFS isn't really scalable in the current state and is rather laggy randomly, >> also if that instance where to die everyone would be screwed. >> >> Considering that opening up registration also potentially increases active >> users, it might be an idea to solve the issue before it seriously becomes >> one and we have a whole gluster like downtime. >> >> TL;DR NFS should DIAF and we should use gluster/ceph for user data. >> >> Damian >> -- >> Damian Zaremba >> http://about.me/damianzaremba >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Labs-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l > _______________________________________________ > Labs-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
