On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Tomasz Finc <[email protected]> wrote:
> The mobile team needs to know how to proceed as well. We use OSM tiles > for our near by view within the Wikipedia app. > They haven't updated their rendering yet to use OBDL data. It still needs to say CC-BY-SA for now. Cheers, Katie > > --tomasz > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Bogott <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On IRC this morning, jongleur points out that OpenStreetMap no longer > > uses CC-by-SA; their data is now licensed under ODbL. There's a lengthy > > explanation of the rationale for the change here: > > http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License > > > > Currently the labs Terms of Use says " all content must be freely > > licensable under an applicable creative commons license." That seems to > > exclude OSM data, which surely is not our intent. I note that the item > just > > before that (about software licenses) uses a more expansive term, " > > OSI-approved open source licenses." Is there a similar umbrella term > that > > we can use for content that would include CC-like licenses without > > restricting users to actual, literal CC licensing? > > > > -Andrew > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Labs-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Labs-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l > -- Board member, Wikimedia District of Columbia http://wikimediadc.org @wikimediadc / @wikimania2012
_______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
