On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03.10.2012 19:33, Andrew Bogott wrote: >> (I can imagine something like having a >> non-puppetized file that includes a puppetized default file or something >> along >> those lines... but nothing elegant.) > > I would have suggested the inverse: have a puppetized configuration file that > includes a non-puppetized "private" config file (if it exists). >
Ah. Sorry. We chatted about this on IRC and forgot to update the list. That's the direction that'll likely be taken. - Ryan _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
