Thank you for the answer. I return this answer to GLAM people and will
submit a request in the webtools project.
Seb35
Le Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:55:34 +0100, Ryan Lane <[email protected]> a
écrit:
Things like this would be considered a semi-production tool. We only
prohibit running things in a production way like wikis or something that
should live in production because it would need to have production like
uptime (like something critical to running the sites or associated
processes).
If others may wish to use this for tools, it may make sense to run this
in
the webtools project.
- Ryan
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Seb35 <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if it is permitted to install on the Labs tools
which
could be useful for Wikimedia activities but without having in mind to
develop the tool. I searched a bit on archives of the list and on the
wiki,
but didn’t found anything related.
The specific case is the installation of OpenRefine [1][2] (ex Google
Refine) useful to manipulate data, for instance GLAM metadata --
specifically here for a cooperation with a museum in Belgium but it
could
be for any data manipulations.
OpenRefine is a web tool in Java+Python which listens on a specific
port.
It is originally intended to run on the local computer. It seems it
don’t
use many ressources for a single user.
So is there any rules regarding the general case? And if it is
case-by-case, is there a checklist for a specific tool (security,
ressources, environment, etc.)?
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Google_Refine<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Refine>
[2]
https://github.com/OpenRefine/**OpenRefine<https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine>
Thanks,
~ Seb35
______________________________**_________________
Labs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/labs-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l>
_______________________________________________
Labs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
