On 20/02/13 16:02, Harry Burt wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Marc A. Pelletier <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I think an important part of this would be to have a Wiki where > the mainspace is the tools' information and description. I wouldn't > even want to limit it to Labs-hosted tools; there are plenty of > community developers that cannot or do not need to be hosted at the labs > whose work is nevertheless valuable to the projects and would deserve > being known about. > > As you may be aware Coren, the Toolserver has tried to maintain its own > list of tools in the past, and indeed still maintains an amount of > documentation on the Toolserver wiki. Note that the main issue is not > the availability of a space, it's whether tool developers can be > bothered to document their own tools. Whether they can be bothered is > itself a factor of traffic: at the moment, I think most Toolserver > developers see the primary discovery route to be via their local wiki, > rather than a central one. I don't expect that to change.
If we follow the idea of one project per tool, we can make a list with each tool, there could be an automatic at the root, so that even if there's no description for one tool, at least it shows its existence. _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
