On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Petr Bena <[email protected]> wrote: > I see some of your points, but this seems to me like "make life of > sysadmin easier" vs "make life of programmer (tool maintainer) far > harder"
Legoktm was able to port his tool from memcached to redis in a very, very short period of time. This is less than 15 mins of work, and will be dwarfed by work required to fix other things that break when you move from toolserver to toollabs. Toolserver also never had memcached (or so Krinkle tells me), so 'will be harder to port toolserver tools' is also not too valid reason. And if they really, *really* want to be that lazy, I can happily help them port. But I think most cases will just be of people adding caching support for their tools from scratch, so I'd rather have them use redis (with a prefix, as documented!) than memcached. -- Yuvi Panda T http://yuvi.in/blog _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
