Hi Oliver,
Thanks a lot. Then, I look forward to the confirmation and implementation of
this feature. In case it's better to open a new issue on bugzilla or any other
action on my side (lend a hand with value reviewing/testing) just let me know.
Regards,
Felipe.
El Jueves 13 de febrero de 2014 18:37, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]>
escribió:
I can't see a reason for the data to not be available; the deficiencies were
(iirc) pre-2004-ish. It's actually really trivial to tell when they started,
because the "guesstimates" are the timestamp of the first revision associated
with the user.
>
>So I'm not sure that this was a deliberate design decision - and if it was, I
>can't imagine they'd nullify the entire field just because of some
>inaccuracies a decade ago ;p.
>
>
>
>
>On 13 February 2014 09:13, Felipe Ortega <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Thanks, Nemo.
>>
>>It is a shame. Does this means that this information is also inaccurate for
>>users created after r12207 (Dec. 2005) ? At least, it would be useful to
>>compare any differences between the periods 2006-2008 and 2009-present.
>>
>>In fact, I remember that this information was available in the DB replicas in
>>Toolserver. But I haven't had the chance to check against log entries, yet.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Felipe.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>El Jueves 13 de febrero de 2014 15:17, Federico Leva (Nemo)
>><[email protected]> escribió:
>>
>>Felipe Ortega, 13/02/2014 14:57:
>>>
>>>> My question is: are there any reasons for redacting this (apparently
>>>> public) info? I can't figure out why this could be sensitive data.
>>>
>>>It's not redacted, it simply never existed. There aren't even log
>>>entries for old registrations; on some wiki(s) the field was populated
>>>with guesstimates.
>>>See also https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18638 ,
>>>https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22097 depends on it/is a
>>>duplicate.
>>>
>>>Nemo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Analytics mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Oliver Keyes
>Product Analyst
>Wikimedia Foundation
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Labs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
