On 02/25/2014 12:21 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > So that's how many tasks are running in a given point in time, right? > Not how many tasks have run (to completion).
If we presume the distribution between continuous and batch jobs is fairly stable (which seems like a reasonable assumption) then it's still a good indicator of growth. Right now, the job numbers are just over 2600000 and they are allocated consecutively; there's no easy way of saying how many of those were "successful" (mainly because how one defines success would depend on what the job /was/) but since the period is about 11 months then we know it's the right order of magnitude. -- Marc _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
