I appreciate a working alternative. Diversity rules.

The other causa: In some cases, AGF is stretched to its limit. Recently
i clicked a link in enwp
http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/view/Peer_reviewer
which redirected me without any warning to a 3rd-party side. I don't
like this.

To prevent this in the future, for me and others, I'm currently working
on a comprehensive directory 2.0 service which will display some
additional information about the provided services. Among others if it
uses TOS-violating tracking techniques, external (tracked) resources or
doesn't provide insight to its sources.
Those services will be marked and rated down.
https://tools.wmflabs.org/directory/

- Hedonil

PS: I still believe in AGF and I'm aware that progress is driven by
controversy. But regarding some manners and looking at
https://tools.wmflabs.org/directory/?view=tools&show=all&search=dispenser
(counting like 42 inactive, completely locked down tools) gives me food
for thought.



On 30/08/14 03:10, John wrote:
> Not only that but, Dispenser has tried a few things on tools that make
> me question their trustworthiness, It wouldnt surprise me if at some
> point he uses the tool as a checkuser like power. (Since its not run
> on labs user IP and private information is exposed)
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Hasteur Wikipedia
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Look at it right now.... Tools should not be held ransom from the
>     community
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>     On Aug 29, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "TParis" <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>>     Reflinks is gone?  I’ve been using this:
>>
>>      
>>
>>     http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py
>>     <http://dispenser.homenet.org/%7Edispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py>
>>
>>      
>>
>>     v/r,
>>
>>     TParis
>>
>>      
>>
>>     *From:*[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Erik
>>     Moeller
>>     *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 7:54 AM
>>     *To:* Wikimedia Labs
>>     *Cc:* Marielle Volz
>>     *Subject:* [Labs-l] Citoid front-end - reflinks alternative
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Hi Labs hackers,
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Citoid is a new web service under development that performs full
>>     citation metadata extraction for a number of supported sources,
>>     and basic metadata extraction (<title>) for others. It's not
>>     working perfectly yet, but it is running in Labs right now, and a
>>     nice front-end might be a good alternative to the (now gone)
>>     reflinks tool.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     There is an existing user script for VisualEditor that
>>     demonstrates the basic usage.
>>
>>      
>>
>>     http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Citoid
>>
>>     http://citoid.wmflabs.org/
>>
>>     https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mvolz/veCiteFromURL.js
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Any takers?
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Erik
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Erik Möller
>>     VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>
>>     Labs-l mailing list
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Labs-l mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l

_______________________________________________
Labs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l

Reply via email to