On 13/03/15 21:23, Ryan Lane wrote:
This alone is actually an excellent reason to require that code be
publicly accessible, with a license associated before tools are allowed
to be run.
This was a pretty major problem in toolserver. When the migration
occurred there were a number of tools that had no license and couldn't
be moved because of that.
I'd be in favor of pushing to make it a requirement for new tools.
- Ryan
Toolserver required a default license for years, and you had to agree
with that when renewing your account. So I'm quite sure there was a
license applicable for all tools. The license could be propietary
though, and that could impede the migration.
_______________________________________________
Labs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
