Is database corruption considered a priority issue for Labs? The enwiki database replica has been corrupt since about 30 April; I posted a bug report[1] on 2 May, but it hasn't even been triaged yet. In the meantime, there seems to have been further corruption within the past 24-36 hours, as evidenced by tools that report link counts (based on the replica) that are highly inaccurate when checked on the live wiki.
I'm surprised this isn't causing problems for other users' tools (or at least that no one has complained about it). At a minimum, I know that the pagelinks table in the replica contains entries that don't exist on the live wiki. I would assume it likely is also missing some entries that do exist on the live wiki, although this is much harder to confirm. Other tables may be inaccurate, as well. [1] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134203 _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
