On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Magnus Manske <[email protected]> wrote: > A few tools seem to have "Tool-Labs-tools-TOOLNAME" tags already? > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:32 PM Chase Pettet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Andre, >> >> How do you feel about the idea of automatic project creation using some >> convention such as tools-$foo or some such. We are ramping up with usage >> via https://toolsadmin.wikimedia.org/ where management of code with >> Git/Diffusion is both encouraged and integrated. It would make some sense >> to anticipate that code hosted in Diffusion will at some point require >> associated tasks, and it may be nice to establish a norm now on naming :)
Self-service creation of manifest projects (Phabricator bug tracking) is a planned feature for Striker. This is tracked in <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T144111>. There isn't strong consensus one way or the other yet for the project naming scheme. I proposed `#Tool-<toolname>`. The general existing convention is `#Tool-Labs-tools-<toolname>`. The existing task would be a good place for people to continue to discuss the general topic. Bryan -- Bryan Davis Wikimedia Foundation <[email protected]> [[m:User:BDavis_(WMF)]] Sr Software Engineer Boise, ID USA irc: bd808 v:415.839.6885 x6855 _______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
