Daniel S. Haischt wrote: > Just out of curiosity - are you going to provide a mDNS compliant API? > Like the one that can be found in jmdns.
Maybe, but its personally not a priority. mDNS is focused on a similar but different set of problems. mDNS really isn't an 'API' but defines a set of network protocols -- so, maybe its possible to mascarade parts of dislocate on top of mDNS -- but from what ive seen of mDNS before, it really isn't meant to be used for 'high performance' parts, and generally allows a high latency. In my model for the client, I would prefer <1ms location of services. Maybe its possible to use mDNS for the network part, and just make the caching very aggressive, but I will need to investigate it more. -Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
