On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 19:34 +0200, Javier Puerto wrote:

Hi Javier, first of all 

On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 11:23 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> [Can we please avoid top posting, it makes the archives hard to read
> 
> ... and therefore less useful to those who come after us

Top posting means you give the answer on top and not within the context.
Please keep this in mind for future posts. 

> Sounds good. The 'I' preffix make the name more clear. You can do
> 
> IDroid droid = new DefaultDroid();
> 
> Then the interface is identified without the needed of see in what package is.

So you agree with:

> > On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 17:59 -0400, Ryan McKinley wrote:
...
> > > > I've been using wicket and C# recently...  I like their
> convention  
> > > > to prefix all interfaces with "I"
...
> > > > So we would have:
> > > > IDroid
> > > > IHandler
> > > > IOutlink
> > > > ITask
> > > > ILink
> > > > ITaskmaster
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > thoughts?  I figure I should throw it out there while the API is in  
> > > > flux ;)

If you guys prefer the prefixing "I" am -0 (not against it blocking but
still not really convinced). 

I agree that if we change it we should do it now.

salu2
-- 
Thorsten Scherler                                 thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java                      consulting, training and solutions


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to