Guys, thanks for your support. Pinaki, are you here? (I'd expect every PI to check what's going on here once in a while.)
I will revert the commit within 72 hrs if we don't make progress with this issue. Bernd Leo Simons wrote: > On 12/15/09 1:33 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> -1 to this commit. >> >> I'm sorry, but I'm not convinced that we (the Apache Labs community) >> have enough clarity about where this code is coming from, really. >> >> For everyone interested, see related thread on 2009-12-03 and LABS-499. > > Yeah, I saw that. As annoying as it is, I think you're completely on the > ball here. Bummer. > > IIRC labs is specifically *not* for collaboration with non-committers: > the labs charter was designed with specific constraints so that > oversight is easy - all code starts from scratch with development in the > open, with work done on that code only by people that have a CLA on file > and that are committing their own contributions. > > Regardless of what labs is and isn't intended for, in this specific case > of fluid and the contributions from LABS-499, the code provenance for > all of this stuff is clearly not clear. > > I believe that the appropriate response here would be to find a > different home for fluid somewhere at apache that is set up to process > outside contributions, and then go through the incubator IP clearance > process for the contributions in LABS-499, including getting appropriate > (C)CLA, code grant and such. > > ciao, > > - Leo > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org
