On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 3/7/13 12:03 PM, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>>...Sounds to me that Mavibot is a good candidate to terminate
>> his Lab lifecycle and be graduated as an incubator project or join and
>> already existing project :)
> I hope so... Not sure which would be the best yet...

FWIW the Jackrabbit Oak team are currently experimenting with
different back-ends for their storage microkernel [1], I have not
looked in detail but mavibot might be an option.

BTW I have a patch for you below, current didn't compile for me.

-Bertrand

[1] 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf//jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk-api/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/api/MicroKernel.java

Index: mavibot/pom.xml
===================================================================
--- mavibot/pom.xml     (revision 1453902)
+++ mavibot/pom.xml     (working copy)
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
   <properties>
     <junit.version>4.10</junit.version>
     <commons.collections.version>3.2.1</commons.collections.version>
+    <slf4j.version>1.7.2</slf4j.version>
   </properties>

   <dependencies>
@@ -51,6 +52,12 @@
       <artifactId>commons-collections</artifactId>
       <version>${commons.collections.version}</version>
     </dependency>
+
+    <dependency>
+      <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
+      <artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
+      <version>${slf4j.version}</version>
+    </dependency>
   </dependencies>

   <build>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org

Reply via email to