On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:14 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Following on from the thread entitled > > "Is Labs using Consensus or Lazy Consensus?" > > I propose to remove the word "lazy" from the bylaws where it appears > as a qualifier to the descriptions of the voting process. > > This is not a change in the process, merely a clarification - or > rather, removal of a source of confusion.
Umm, I believe that the original intention was that new labs would be subject to lazy approval. You would probably have to look back in the archives to figure out the intent, if it matters whether this is a change to the process. I'd go further and suggest that there is no need for any kind of approval to open or shutter a specific lab, and that the primary purpose of the labs PMC is to simply prevent misuse of its sandbox/lists as a distribution area, but that is something the PMC can decide for itself. ....Roy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org
