I'm a fan of not allowing official releases from @labs. There's an implied contract with an Apache release and I suspect a project in @labs wouldn't (necessarily) be able to live up to that (nor should they feel they have to). If a project is at a point where it can live up to the contract of an official release, maybe that is one of the deciding factors in moving out of @labs into the incubator.
That said, perhaps there a way to support a type of release so a @labs project could gain additional traction. Perhaps a requirement that the version include "-LABS", or "-SNAPSHOT", or other to clearly indicate via the version that the release is not official. - Dennis On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, there was an implied "as of now" :). You're obviously correct (and > don't call me Shirley, sorry couldn't resist). > > That said, as I mentioned a while ago, wouldn't this make it sort of an > incubator@ competitor? There were many proposals and suggestions made in > the past. I am sure you're aware of them, but I'd recommend new subscribers > go read the archives. > > Cheers, > Hadrian > > On 03/08/2017 03:24 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> >> >> On 03/08/2017 02:02 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> >>> one cannot release from labs >>> >> >> Surely this is one of the points that we are here to debate, not merely >> accept as being a fact in stone? >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org > >
