Clay wrote:

<Are you certain that your sources are
absolutely correct?  I tend to be skeptical when it comes to
the news we read and hear from commercial sources (their
goal, after all, is to make money, and sensationalism
sells...)>

Our broadcast news isn't a commercial source. Newspapers are, but they tend
to have a political bias rather than a commercial one.

BBC news is funded from the license fee paid by everyone who has a TV set
and from the sale of programmes to other UK companies and to overseas
companies. There are no advertisements on BBC - yes we actually get to watch
a programme from start to finish with no interruptions - apart from trailers
for their own upcoming programmes or public information announcements like
"If you're over 65, get your (free) 'flu jab now" which happen between
programmes.

The news on commercial stations isn't funded from a biased source either.
All programmes on these stations have four or five breaks per hour in their
programmes which are each fillled with several short pre-recorded
advertisements for different products, so no one company can dictate
content. Some popular programmes are sponsored by a particular company eg
Cadburys the chocolate manufacturers sponsors 'Coronation Street' (one of
the popular soaps), but has no say on content and their sponsorship
anouncement occurs at the breaks only. They don't get extra product
placement opportunities in the shops or anywhere else in the soaps either.
The news on commercial stations isn't sponsored.

Newspapers do exaggerate and distort - the aim of the tabloids in particular
is to sell through sensationalism. The Prince Charles rumour is one example.
The newspapers printed a hint to increase their circulation. Their normal
ploy is to publish and then wait to be sued if what they pubish is
incorrect. A court injunction being taken out by one of the people involved
stopped the publication of the actual story - which any UK citizen is
entitled to do. The broadcast news only reported what each newspaper had
published - they didn't report the story themselves. They dare not take the
'publish and wait to be sued' route. Anything broadcast is governed by the
Broadcasting Standards Authority which has very strict rules.

So, yes  I am certain the sources are correct as it was on BBC news. I did
actually buy a newspaper on Saturday for the first time in many years, but
not for the biased news - there was a free Elvis Presly CD in it!

Jean in Poole

To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to