I don't expect any one of us will ever know what went on in that marriage, and I for one am not particularly interested in the rights and wrongs of who slept with whom first - I just take exception to people - especially women, who have fought against such things for years - judging women on their looks. Those in greenhouses shouldn't throw stones - and there are precious few of you lucky enough to be blessed with said good looks, so maybe a little charity may not come amiss. By all means criticise actions - remembering that those who are without sin can cast the first stone - but to criticise and judge because one woman is not as photogenic as another is unjust in the extreme.
Carol ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacqui Southworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Carol Adkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 7:24 AM Subject: Re: [lace-chat] British Royals and marriages On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:55:33 -0000, you wrote: > >criticising her looks. We cannot all be judged by our beauty or lack >thereof - and she may well be the proof that beauty is only skin-deep, and >what matters is what is inside! Hi Carol - it IS what matters inside - but her betrayal of her husband, and her part in breaking Diana's heart is what causes people to judge her by her looks - and she wasn't very charitable to Diana by all accounts, in private. So she has no beauty, imho, in or out! ttfn Jacqui Jacqui Southworth, Fleetwood, Lancs, England [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW ***Spangled Birth Month Bobbins*** Larkholme Lace - Bobbin Lace Supplies, painted bobbins and tools,books www.larkholmelace.co.uk To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
