Ummmm..... I think I disagree with you on this, Jean. I believe that if we buy a pattern, we are allowed to make it for our own use, but not for any commercial endeavor. We could make a dress for ourselves from a pattern, for example, but we could not produce a line of clothing for sale based on that pattern.... (as if...! )
Clay ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:21 PM Subject: [lace] Miss Channer's mat > I think that what Ruth Bean owns is the 'right' to reproduce 'copies' of the > original pricking ie 'copyright', and any part of the book, including the > photograph which accompanied it. But only until 2019 which will be 70 years > after Catherine Channer's death. Then it will be out of copyright and anyone > should be able to make copies of the original pricking. > > They certainly don't own any mat that's made from the pricking, and anyone > who makes or owns a mat can do anything with it that they want including > reproducing pictures of the one they have made/own. Just the same as if you > buy a dress or knitting pattern and make the garment, the company producing > the pattern, doesn't own the garment you made and you can do with it what > you will. > > Jean in Poole > > - > To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: > unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
